The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Ethnicity as a Risk Factor for Inadequate Emergency Department Analgesia
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether Hispanic patients with isolated long-bone fractures are less likely to receive emergency department (ED) analgesics than similar non-Hispanic white patients. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: The UCLA Emergency Medicine Center, a level I trauma center. PARTICIPANTS: All Hispanic and non-Hispanic white ED patients aged 15 to 55 years, seen between January 1, 1990, and December 31, 1991, with isolated long-bone fractures, identified by ICD-9 codes 812, 813, 821, and 823, were eligible for inclusion. Exclusion criteria included injury more than 6 hours prior to presentation, "possible" or chip fractures only, altered mentation, or ethanol intoxication. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Emergency department administration of analgesic or no analgesic. RESULTS: The study group consisted of 139 patients meeting inclusion criteria, of whom 31 were Hispanic and 108 non-Hispanic white. Non-Hispanic whites were significantly more likely to speak English, be insured, and suffer nonoccupational injuries. Hispanics were twice as likely as non-Hispanic whites to receive no ED pain medication (crude relative risk [RR], 2.12; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.35 to 3.32; P = .003). The RR for ethnicity was similar and significant (P < .05) after controlling by stratification for covariates related to patient, injury, or physician characteristics. After controlling for several covariates simultaneously through multiple logistic regression, ethnicity remained the strongest predictor of ED analgesic administration (odds ratio [OR], 7.46; 95% CI, 2.22 to 25.04; P < .01). CONCLUSIONS: Hispanics with isolated long-bone fractures are twice as likely as non-Hispanic whites to receive no pain medication in the UCLA Emergency Medicine Center. No covariate measured in this study could account for this effect. An ethnic basis for variability in analgesic practice needs to be further characterized.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
(1990) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.27-3338 · Cited by 35,305
Cited by
Tervalon, M., & Murray-García, J. (1998) · Journal of Health Care for the Poor and Underserved · doi:10.1353/hpu.2010.0233 · Cited by 3,646
The effect of patient race and socio-economic status on physicians' perceptions of patients
van Ryn, M., & Burke, J. (2000) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/s0277-9536(99)00338-x · Cited by 1,509
The unequal burden of pain: confronting racial and ethnic disparities in pain
Green, C. R., Anderson, K. O., Baker, T. A., Campbell, L. C., Decker, S., Fillingim, R. B., Kaloukalani, D. A., Lasch, K. E., Myers, C., Tait, R. C., et al. (2003) · Pain Medicine · doi:10.1046/j.1526-4637.2003.03034.x · Cited by 1,248
Self-citationStuart, M. J., & Nagel, R. L. (2004) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(04)17192-4 · Cited by 819
van Ryn, M., & Fu, S. S. (2003) · American Journal of Public Health · doi:10.2105/ajph.93.2.248 · Cited by 608
Metadata
- Authors
- Todd, K. H.
- Venue
- JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 1993-03-24
- Volume
- 269
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 1537
- ISSN
- 0002-9955 (ISSN-L)
- 0098-7484
- OpenAlex
- W2018529805
- Cited by
- 885
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 21.20
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Ethnicity as a Risk Factor for Inadequate Emergency Department Analgesia. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/jama.1993.03500120075029
- The paper
- Todd, K. H. (1993). Ethnicity as a Risk Factor for Inadequate Emergency Department Analgesia. JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.1993.03500120075029
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.