The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Changes in Bone Density With Lactation
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To test the a priori hypotheses that significant bone loss occurs in lactation of greater than 5 months' duration and that bone mass returns to baseline levels when breast-feeding ceases. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study design of 12 months' duration. SETTING: General community setting with recruitment occurring at birthing education classes. PARTICIPANTS: Volunteer sample of 98 healthy women of white (n = 95) and Asian (n = 3) origin, aged 20 to 40 years, and 0 to 1 parity prior to parturition, grouped according to lactation duration: 0 through 1, 2 through 5, and 6 or more months. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Bone mineral density (BMD) of the proximal femur was measured by dual-energy x-ray densitometry at 2 weeks (baseline), 2 months, 4 months, 6 months, and 12 months following parturition, and BMD of the lumbar spine was measured at baseline, 6 months, and 12 months after parturition. RESULTS: Women with lactation duration of 6 months or longer had mean BMD losses of 5.1% and 4.8% at the lumbar spine and femoral neck, respectively, comparing baseline values with those at 6 months post partum. Women who breast-fed 0 through 1 month lost no BMD at either bone site. Bone loss in women who breast-fed 6 months or longer was not explained by differences in age, diet, body size, or physical activity. Among women who breast-fed 6 months or longer, there was evidence of return to baseline levels of the lumbar spine at 12 months after parturition. The BMD of the lumbar spine of those women who continued to breast-feed more than 9 months had increased but was still significantly lower than baseline. CONCLUSION: Extended lactation (> or = 70% of energy intake is provided for > or = 6 months) is associated with bone loss; however, there is evidence of return to baseline BMD measurement at 12 months after parturition.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
PHYSICAL ACTIVITY ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY IN THE FIVE-CITY PROJECT1
SALLIS, J. F., HASKELL, W. L., WOOD, P. D., FORTMANN, S. P., ROGERS, T., BLAIR, S. N., & PAFFENBARGER, R. S. (1985) · American Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a113987 · Cited by 1,716
Cited by
Risk Factors for Hip Fracture in White Women
Cummings, S. R., Nevitt, M. C., Browner, W. S., Stone, K., Fox, K. M., Ensrud, K. E., Cauley, J., Black, D., & Vogt, T. M. (1995) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199503233321202 · Cited by 3,595
Rai, R., Cohen, H., Dave, M., & Regan, L. (1997) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.314.7076.253 · Cited by 1,113
Antipsychotic-Induced Hyperprolactinaemia: Mechanisms, Clinical Features and Management
Haddad, P. M., & Wieck, A. (2004) · Drugs · doi:10.2165/00003495-200464200-00003 · Cited by 634
Maternal Mineral and Bone Metabolism During Pregnancy, Lactation, and Post-Weaning Recovery
Kovacs, C. S. (2016) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.00027.2015 · Cited by 544
Ritchie, L., Fung, E., Halloran, B., Turnlund, Jr., Van Loan, M., Cann, C., & King, J. (1998) · The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.1093/ajcn/67.4.693 · Cited by 473
Metadata
- Authors
- Sowers, M.
- Venue
- JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 1993-06-23
- Volume
- 269
- Issue
- 24
- Pages
- 3130
- ISSN
- 0002-9955 (ISSN-L)
- 0098-7484
- OpenAlex
- W2072471551
- Cited by
- 352
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 12.59
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Changes in Bone Density With Lactation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/jama.1993.03500240074029
- The paper
- Sowers, M. (1993). Changes in Bone Density With Lactation. JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.1993.03500240074029
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.