Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 825

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Comparison of Survival Probabilities for Dialysis Patients vs Cadaveric Renal Transplant Recipients

Port, Friedrich K.·1993·JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare mortality risk among cadaveric renal transplant recipients vs transplant candidates on dialysis in the cyclosporine era. SETTING: Patient mortality risk was analyzed by treatment modality for a completed statewide patient population. PATIENTS: All Michigan residents younger than age 65 years who started endstage renal disease (ESRD) therapy between January 1, 1984, and December 31, 1989, were included. Patients were followed up from ESRD onset (n = 5020), to wait-listing for renal transplant (n = 1569), to receiving a cadaveric first transplant (n = 799), and to December 31, 1989. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Mortality rates. RESULTS: Using a time-dependent variable based on the waiting time from date of wait-listing to transplantation and adjusting for age, sex, race, and primary cause of ESRD, the relative risk (RR) of dying was increased early after transplantation and then decreased to a beneficial long-term effect, given survival to 365 days after transplantation (RR, 0.36; P < .001). This lower long-term risk was most pronounced (RR, 0.25) among diabetic transplant recipients compared with diabetic wait-listed dialysis patients (P < .001) and not observed among patients with glomerulonephritis as cause of ESRD (P > .05). Overall, the estimated times from transplantation to equal mortality risk was 117 +/- 28 days and to equal cumulative mortality was 325 +/- 91 days. CONCLUSIONS: The overall mortality risk following renal transplantation was initially increased, but there was a long-term survival benefit compared with similar patients on dialysis. These analyses allow improved description of comparative mortality risks for dialysis and transplant patients and allow advising patients regarding comparative survival outcomes.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/jama.1993.03510110079036

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 825

Metadata

Authors
Port, F. K.
Venue
JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association
Published
1993-09-15
Volume
270
Issue
11
Pages
1339
ISSN
  • 0002-9955 (ISSN-L)
  • 0098-7484
OpenAlex
W2076843879
Cited by
825
References
0
FWCI
9.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Comparison of Survival Probabilities for Dialysis Patients vs Cadaveric Renal Transplant Recipients. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/jama.1993.03510110079036
The paper
Port, F. K. (1993). Comparison of Survival Probabilities for Dialysis Patients vs Cadaveric Renal Transplant Recipients. JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.1993.03510110079036

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.