The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Comparison of Survival Probabilities for Dialysis Patients vs Cadaveric Renal Transplant Recipients
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To compare mortality risk among cadaveric renal transplant recipients vs transplant candidates on dialysis in the cyclosporine era. SETTING: Patient mortality risk was analyzed by treatment modality for a completed statewide patient population. PATIENTS: All Michigan residents younger than age 65 years who started endstage renal disease (ESRD) therapy between January 1, 1984, and December 31, 1989, were included. Patients were followed up from ESRD onset (n = 5020), to wait-listing for renal transplant (n = 1569), to receiving a cadaveric first transplant (n = 799), and to December 31, 1989. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Mortality rates. RESULTS: Using a time-dependent variable based on the waiting time from date of wait-listing to transplantation and adjusting for age, sex, race, and primary cause of ESRD, the relative risk (RR) of dying was increased early after transplantation and then decreased to a beneficial long-term effect, given survival to 365 days after transplantation (RR, 0.36; P < .001). This lower long-term risk was most pronounced (RR, 0.25) among diabetic transplant recipients compared with diabetic wait-listed dialysis patients (P < .001) and not observed among patients with glomerulonephritis as cause of ESRD (P > .05). Overall, the estimated times from transplantation to equal mortality risk was 117 +/- 28 days and to equal cumulative mortality was 325 +/- 91 days. CONCLUSIONS: The overall mortality risk following renal transplantation was initially increased, but there was a long-term survival benefit compared with similar patients on dialysis. These analyses allow improved description of comparative mortality risks for dialysis and transplant patients and allow advising patients regarding comparative survival outcomes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Effect of waiting time on renal transplant outcome
Meier-Kriesche, H.-U., Port, F. K., Ojo, A. O., Rudich, S. M., Hanson, J. A., Cibrik, D. M., Leichtman, A. B., & Kaplan, B. (2000) · Kidney International · doi:10.1046/j.1523-1755.2000.00287.x · Cited by 687
Self-citationDesensitization in HLA-Incompatible Kidney Recipients and Survival
Montgomery, R. A., Lonze, B. E., King, K. E., Kraus, E. S., Kucirka, L. M., Locke, J. E., Warren, D. S., Simpkins, C. E., Dagher, N. N., Singer, A. L., et al. (2011) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1012376 · Cited by 687
Schnuelle, P., Lorenz, D., Trede, M., & Van Der Woude, F. J. (1998) · Journal of the American Society of Nephrology · doi:10.1681/asn.v9112135 · Cited by 477
Serum Trimethylamine-N-Oxide is Elevated in CKD and Correlates with Coronary Atherosclerosis Burden
Stubbs, J. R., House, J. A., Ocque, A. J., Zhang, S., Johnson, C., Kimber, C., Schmidt, K., Gupta, A., Wetmore, J. B., Nolin, T. D., et al. (2016) · Journal of the American Society of Nephrology · doi:10.1681/asn.2014111063 · Cited by 450
IgG endopeptidase in highly sensitized patients undergoing transplantation
Jordan, S. C., Lorant, T., Choi, J., Kjellman, C., Winstedt, L., Bengtsson, M., Zhang, X., Eich, T., Toyoda, M., Eriksson, B.-M., et al. (2017) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1612567 · Cited by 377
Metadata
- Authors
- Port, F. K.
- Venue
- JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 1993-09-15
- Volume
- 270
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 1339
- ISSN
- 0002-9955 (ISSN-L)
- 0098-7484
- OpenAlex
- W2076843879
- Cited by
- 825
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 9.77
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Comparison of Survival Probabilities for Dialysis Patients vs Cadaveric Renal Transplant Recipients. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/jama.1993.03510110079036
- The paper
- Port, F. K. (1993). Comparison of Survival Probabilities for Dialysis Patients vs Cadaveric Renal Transplant Recipients. JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.1993.03510110079036
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.