The DOI matches its Crossref record; 18 of the 18 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Impact of renal cadaveric transplantation on survival in end-stage renal failure: evidence for reduced mortality risk compared with hemodialysis during long-term follow-up.
Abstract
Despite a superior quality of life and a favorable cost effectiveness, it has not been well established thus far whether renal cadaveric transplantation contributes to superior survival probability of end-stage renal disease patients in Europe, because the mortality rate on dialysis is lower compared with the United States. This analysis was undertaken to compare the mortality of wait-listed patients and transplant recipients during long-term follow-up, including the possibility of a retransplant in a single-center study. The study cohort included 309 consecutive patients, ages 17 to 72 yr, being registered on the waiting list of the Renal Transplantation Center of Mannheim since the initiation of the transplantation program on June 3, 1989. Follow-up was terminated on September 30, 1997, with a mean of 4.15 yr. A total of 144 renal cadaveric transplants (four retransplants) was performed during the follow-up period. A Cox regression model considering the time-dependent exposure to the different therapy modalities was applied for statistical analysis. Patients being removed from the waiting list or coming back to dialysis after transplantation were censored at time of withdrawal or graft failure. Transplantation resulted in a lower hazard ratio, which was 0.36 (95% confidence interval, 0.15 to 0.87) when the hazard of the wait-listed group was taken as 1.00. The underlying incidence rate of death was 0.026 per patient-year (0.032 on dialysis versus 0.016 with functioning graft). Performing the evaluation on an intention-to-treat basis without censoring the lower risk of the transplanted group was still pronounced according to a hazard ratio of 0.44 (95% confidence interval, 0.22 to 0.89). Thus, patients receiving a renal cadaveric transplantation have a substantial survival advantage over corresponding end-stage renal disease patients on the waiting list even in the setting of a single transplantation center where mortality on regular dialysis therapy was comparatively low.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Regression Models and Life-Tables
Cox, D. R. (1992) · Springer Series in Statistics · doi:10.1007/978-1-4612-4380-9_37 · Cited by 26,297
The Statistical Analysis of Failure Time Data.
Aitkin, M., Kalbfleisch, J. D., & Prentice, R. L. (1981) · Biometrics · doi:10.2307/2530581 · Cited by 9,877
SOLLINGER, H. W. (1995) · Transplantation · doi:10.1097/00007890-199508000-00003 · Cited by 1,363
A study of the quality of life and cost-utility of renal transplantation
Laupacis, A., Keown, P., Pus, N., Krueger, H., Ferguson, B., Wong, C., & Muirhead, N. (1996) · Kidney International · doi:10.1038/ki.1996.307 · Cited by 1,167
(1996) · Transplantation · doi:10.1097/00007890-199604150-00008 · Cited by 1,055
Grinyo, J. M., GROTH, C. G., Pichlmayr, R., Sadek, S., Vanrenterghem, Y. F. C., Behrend, M., Luck, R. P., Moreso, F., Peeters, J. A. G., Rodicio, J. L., et al. (1995) · University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) · Cited by 974
Comparison of Survival Probabilities for Dialysis Patients vs Cadaveric Renal Transplant Recipients
Port, F. K. (1993) · JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association · doi:10.1001/jama.1993.03510110079036 · Cited by 825
Covariance Analysis of Heart Transplant Survival Data
Crowley, J., & Hu, M. (1977) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.1977.10479903 · Cited by 482
Maiorca, R., Brunori, G., Zubani, R., Cancarini, G. C., Manili, L., Camerini, C., Movilli, E., Pola, A., d'Avolio, G., & Gelatti, U. (1995) · Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation · doi:10.1093/ndt/10.12.2295 · Cited by 332
The Impact of Comorbid and Sociodemographic Factors on Access to Renal Transplantation
Gaylin, D. S. (1993) · JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association · doi:10.1001/jama.1993.03500050081030 · Cited by 263
Cited by
Effect of waiting time on renal transplant outcome
Meier-Kriesche, H.-U., Port, F. K., Ojo, A. O., Rudich, S. M., Hanson, J. A., Cibrik, D. M., Leichtman, A. B., & Kaplan, B. (2000) · Kidney International · doi:10.1046/j.1523-1755.2000.00287.x · Cited by 687
Lindahl, J. P., Hartmann, A., Horneland, R., Holdaas, H., Reisæter, A. V., Midtvedt, K., Leivestad, T., Øyen, O., & Jenssen, T. (2013) · Diabetologia · doi:10.1007/s00125-013-2888-y · Cited by 61
Lo, C., Toyama, T., Oshima, M., Jun, M., Chin, K. L., Hawley, C. M., & Zoungas, S. (2020) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd009966.pub3 · Cited by 30
Metadata
- Authors
- Schnuelle, P., Lorenz, D., Trede, M., & Van Der Woude, F. J.
- Venue
- Journal of the American Society of Nephrology
- Published
- 1998-11
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 2135-2141
- ISSN
- 1046-6673 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2165667470
- Cited by
- 477
- References
- 18
- FWCI
- 7.71
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Impact of renal cadaveric transplantation on survival in end-stage renal failure: evidence for reduced mortality risk compared with hemodialysis during long-term follow-up. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1681/asn.v9112135
- The paper
- Schnuelle, P., Lorenz, D., Trede, M., & Van Der Woude, F. J. (1998). Impact of renal cadaveric transplantation on survival in end-stage renal failure: evidence for reduced mortality risk compared with hemodialysis during long-term follow-up. Journal of the American Society of Nephrology. https://doi.org/10.1681/asn.v9112135
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.