The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Distinct Criteria for Termination of Resuscitation in the Out-of-Hospital Setting
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To identify distinct criteria for appropriate on-scene termination of resuscitation efforts for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest when on-scene interventions fail to restore spontaneous circulation. DESIGN: For 18 months, all out-of-hospital cardiac arrests were evaluated prospectively for survival to hospital discharge and for all established survival predictors including age, gender, presenting cardiac rhythm, whether it was a witnessed event, performance of basic cardiopulmonary resuscitation by bystanders, and interval to paramedic arrival and return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC). SETTING: A large municipality with a single, centralized emergency medical services program. PATIENTS: All normothermic adults treated for out-of-hospital, unmonitored, primary cardiac arrest. INTERVENTIONS: Standard advanced cardiac life support provided at the scene by paramedics. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The number and circumstances of patients achieving survival to hospital discharge following failure to achieve on-scene ROSC. RESULTS: Of 1461 consecutive primary cardiac arrests, 139 were monitored (paramedic witnessed), including 59 that occurred en route to the hospital. Of the 1322 unmonitored patients, 370 achieved ROSC at the scene. Only six (0.6%) of the 952 who did not achieve ROSC at the scene survived, and all six were readily identifiable as having persistent ventricular fibrillation. Excluding those patients with persistent ventricular fibrillation, all survivors achieved ROSC within 25 minutes after paramedic arrival. CONCLUSIONS: Excluding patients with persistent ventricular fibrillation, resuscitative efforts can be terminated at the scene when normothermic adults with unmonitored, out-of-hospital, primary cardiac arrest do not regain spontaneous circulation within 25 minutes following standard advanced cardiac life support. These criteria should now be validated in several large centers with high survival rates.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Clinical Prediction Rules: Applications and Methodological Standards
Wasson, J. H., Sox, H. C., Neff, R. K., & Goldman, L. (1985) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm198509263131306 · Cited by 1,357
Cited by
Murphy, D. J., Burrows, D., Santilli, S., Kemp, A. W., Tenner, S., Kreling, B., & Teno, J. (1994) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199402243300807 · Cited by 580
Eisenberg, M. S., & Mengert, T. J. (2001) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm200104263441707 · Cited by 426
Greif (2020) · doi:10.1016/j.resuscitation.2020.09.014 · Cited by 158
AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS Committee on Trauma, AMERICAN COLLEGE OF EMERGENCY PHYSICIANS Pediatric Emergency Medicine Committee, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF EMS PHYSICIANS, AMERICAN ACADEMY OF PEDIATRICS Committee on Pediatric Emergency Medicine, Fallat, M. E., Cooper, A., Salomone, J., Mooney, D., Scherer, T., Wesson, D., et al. (2014) · Pediatrics · doi:10.1542/peds.2014-0176 · Cited by 58
Metadata
- Authors
- Bonnin, M. J.
- Venue
- JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 1993-09-22
- Volume
- 270
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 1457
- ISSN
- 0002-9955 (ISSN-L)
- 0098-7484
- OpenAlex
- W2095562355
- Cited by
- 217
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 21.81
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Distinct Criteria for Termination of Resuscitation in the Out-of-Hospital Setting. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/jama.1993.03510120079035
- The paper
- Bonnin, M. J. (1993). Distinct Criteria for Termination of Resuscitation in the Out-of-Hospital Setting. JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.1993.03510120079035
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.