The DOI matches its Crossref record; 27 of the 27 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Positive Predictive Value of Screening Mammography by Age and Family History of Breast Cancer
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To determine the positive predictive value (PPV) of low-cost screening mammography according to age and family history of breast cancer. DESIGN: Cross-sectional. SETTING: Six counties in northern California. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 31,814 women aged 30 years and older referred for mammography to the University of California, San Francisco, Mobile Mammography Screening Program from April 18, 1985, through November 20, 1992. MEASUREMENTS: Breast cancer risk profile, two standard mammographic views per breast, and follow-up of abnormal screening examinations. RESULTS: Although women aged 50 years or older constituted only 38.3% of all women who received first-screening mammography, 74% of breast cancers were detected in this group. Ten cancers were diagnosed per 1000 first-screening examinations in women aged 50 years or older, with 14.8 diagnostic procedures per cancer diagnosed compared with two cancers per 1000 screening examinations and 48.3 diagnostic tests per cancer diagnosed in women younger than 50 years. The PPV of first-screening mammography (number of breast cancers detected per abnormal examination) increased with age: .03 for those aged 30 to 39 years; .04 for those aged 40 to 49; .09 for those aged 50 to 59; .17 for those aged 60 to 69; and .19 for those aged 70 years or older (chi 2 for trend, P < .001). Women aged 50 to 59 years had a higher PPV for first-screening mammography than women aged 40 to 49 years (.09 vs. .04; P = .004), and women with a family history of breast cancer had higher PPVs compared with women without history (40 to 49 years of age, .13 vs .04, P = .01; and 50 to 59 years of age, .22 vs .09, P = .01). CONCLUSION: Five times as many cancers per 1000 first-screening mammographic examinations were diagnosed in women aged 50 years or older compared with women aged less than 50 years. The highest PPVs for mammography were in women aged 50 years or older and in women aged 40 years or older with a family history of breast cancer. Efforts to promote screening mammography should focus on women in these groups, in whom the majority of breast cancers occur and for whom mammography has the highest PPVs.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Beahrs, O. H., & Henson, D. E. (1992) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 2,460
Breast cancer screening with mammography: overview of Swedish randomised trials
Nyström, L., Wall, S., Rutqvist, L. E., Lindgren, A., Lindqvist, M., Rydén, S., Andersson, J., Bjurstam, N., Fagerberg, G., Frisell, J., et al. (1993) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/0140-6736(93)91067-v · Cited by 968
Mammographic screening and mortality from breast cancer: the Malmö mammographic screening trial.
Andersson, I., Aspegren, K., Janzon, L., Landberg, T., Lindholm, K., Linell, F., Ljungberg, O., Ranstam, J., & Sigfússon, B. (1988) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.297.6654.943 · Cited by 916
Report of the International Workshop on Screening for Breast Cancer
Fletcher, S. W., Black, W., Harris, R., Rimer, B. K., & Shapiro, S. (1993) · JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute · doi:10.1093/jnci/85.20.1644 · Cited by 792
Miller, A. B., Baines, C. J., To, T. M., & Wall, C. (1992) · Europe PMC (PubMed Central) · Cited by 744
UPDATE OF THE SWEDISH TWO-COUNTY PROGRAM OF MAMMOGRAPHIC SCREENING FOR BREAST CANCER
Tabàr, L., Fagerberg, G., Duffy, S. W., Day, N. E., Gad, A., & Gröntoft, O. (1992) · Radiologic Clinics of North America · doi:10.1016/s0033-8389(22)02494-0 · Cited by 731
Harris, J. R., Lippman, M. E., Veronesi, U., & Willett, W. (1992) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199207303270505 · Cited by 701
Intraductal carcinoma of the breast: Follow-up after biopsy only
Page, D. L., Dupont, W. D., Rogers, L. W., & Landenberger, M. (1982) · Cancer · doi:10.1002/1097-0142(19820215)49:4<751::aid-cncr2820490426>3.0.co;2-y · Cited by 608
Psychological and Behavioral Implications of Abnormal Mammograms
Lerman, C., Track, B., Rimer, B. K., Boyce, A., Jepson, C., & Engstrom, P. F. (1991) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-114-8-657 · Cited by 481
Edinburgh trial of screening for breast cancer: mortality at seven years
HUGGINS, A. (1990) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/0140-6736(90)90066-e · Cited by 445
Cited by
American Cancer Society Guidelines for Breast Cancer Screening: Update 2003
Smith, R. A., Saslow, D., Andrews Sawyer, K., Burke, W., Costanza, M. E., Evans, W. P., Foster, R. S., Hendrick, E., Eyre, H. J., & Sener, S. (2003) · CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians · doi:10.3322/canjclin.53.3.141 · Cited by 770
Detection of Lung Cancer With Volatile Markers in the Breatha
Phillips, M., Cataneo, R. N., Cummin, A. R. C., Gagliardi, A. J., Gleeson, K., Greenberg, J., Maxfield, R. A., & Rom, W. N. (2003) · Chest · doi:10.1378/chest.123.6.2115 · Cited by 567
Twenty-five years of breast cancer risk models and their applications
Gail, M. H. (2015) · JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute · doi:10.1093/jnci/djv042 · Cited by 56
Metadata
- Authors
- Kerlikowske, K.
- Venue
- JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 1993-11-24
- Volume
- 270
- Issue
- 20
- Pages
- 2444
- ISSN
- 0002-9955 (ISSN-L)
- 0098-7484
- OpenAlex
- W2041333229
- Cited by
- 364
- References
- 27
- FWCI
- 16.91
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Positive Predictive Value of Screening Mammography by Age and Family History of Breast Cancer. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/jama.1993.03510200050031
- The paper
- Kerlikowske, K. (1993). Positive Predictive Value of Screening Mammography by Age and Family History of Breast Cancer. JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.1993.03510200050031
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.