The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Mammographic screening and mortality from breast cancer: the Malmö mammographic screening trial.
Open accessAbstract
STUDY OBJECTIVE--To determine whether mortality from breast cancer could be reduced by repeated mammographic screening. DESIGN--Birth year cohorts of city population separately randomised into study and control groups. SETTING--Screening clinic outside main hospital. PATIENTS--Women aged over 45; 21,088 invited for screening and 21,195 in control group. INTERVENTIONS--Women in the study group were invited to attend for mammographic screening at intervals of 18-24 months. Five rounds of screening were completed. Breast cancer was treated according to stage at diagnosis. END POINT--Mortality from breast cancer. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS--All women were followed up and classed at end point as alive without breast cancer, alive with breast cancer, dead from breast cancer, or dead from other causes. Cause of death was taken from national mortality registry and for patients with breast cancer was validated independently. Mean follow up was 8.8 years. Altogether 588 cases of breast cancer were diagnosed in the study group and 447 in the control group; 99 v 94 women died of all causes and 63 v 66 women died of breast cancer (no significant difference; relative risk 0.96 (95% confidence interval 0.68 to 1.35)). In the study group 29% more women aged less than 55 died of breast cancer (28 v 22; relative risk 1.29 (0.74 to 2.25)). More women in the study group died from breast cancer in the first seven years; after that the trend reversed, especially in women aged greater than or equal to 55 at entry. Overall, women in the study group aged greater than or equal to 55 had a 20% reduction in mortality from breast cancer (35 v 44; relative risk 0.79 (0.51 to 1.24)). OTHER FINDINGS--In the study group 100 (17%) cancers appeared in intervals between screenings and 107 (18%) in non-attenders; 51 of these women died from breast cancer. Cancers classed as stages II-IV comprised 33% (190/579) of cancers in the study group and 52% (231/443) in the control group. CONCLUSIONS--Invitation to mammographic screening may lead to reduced mortality from breast cancer, at least in women aged 55 or over.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
REDUCTION IN MORTALITY FROM BREAST CANCER AFTER MASS SCREENING WITH MAMMOGRAPHY
Tabár, L., Gad, A., Holmberg, L. H., Ljungquist, U., Fagerberg, C. J. G., Baldetorp, L., Gröntoft, O., Lundström, B., Månson, J. C., Eklund, G., et al. (1985) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(85)92204-4 · Cited by 1,781
Ten- to Fourteen-Year Effect of Screening on Breast Cancer Mortality 2
(1982) · JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute · doi:10.1093/jnci/69.2.349 · Cited by 840
Nemoto, T., Vana, J., Bedwani, R. N., Baker, H. W., McGregor, F. H., & Murphy, G. P. (1980) · Cancer · doi:10.1002/1097-0142(19800615)45:12<2917::aid-cncr2820451203>3.0.co;2-m · Cited by 661
Periodic Breast Cancer Screening in Reducing Mortality From Breast Cancer
Shapiro, S. (1971) · JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association · doi:10.1001/jama.1971.03180240027005 · Cited by 499
REDUCTION OF BREAST CANCER MORTALITY THROUGH MASS SCREENING WITH MODERN MAMMOGRAPHY
Verbeek, A. L. M., Holland, R., Sturmans, F., Hendriks, J. H. C. L., Avunac, M., & Day, N. E. (1984) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(84)91703-3 · Cited by 495
Cited by
Is screening for breast cancer with mammography justifiable?
Gøtzsche, P. C., & Olsen, O. (2000) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(99)06065-1 · Cited by 853
Advances in diagnostic imaging and overestimations of disease prevalence and the benefits of therapy
Black, W. C., & Welch, H. G. (1993) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199304293281706 · Cited by 547
Factors associated with repeat adherence to breast cancer screening
Lerman, C., Rimer, B., Trock, B., Balshem, A., & Engstrom, P. F. (1990) · Preventive Medicine · doi:10.1016/0091-7435(90)90028-i · Cited by 466
MacLehose, Reeves, Harvey, Sheldon, Russell, & Black (2000) · Health Technology Assessment · doi:10.3310/hta4340 · Cited by 311
Yip, C. H., & Anderson, B. O. (2007) · Expert Review of Anticancer Therapy · doi:10.1586/14737140.7.8.1095 · Cited by 36
Metadata
- Authors
- Andersson, I., Aspegren, K., Janzon, L., Landberg, T., Lindholm, K., Linell, F., Ljungberg, O., Ranstam, J., & Sigfússon, B.
- Venue
- BMJ
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 1988-10-15
- Volume
- 297
- Issue
- 6654
- Pages
- 943-948
- ISSN
- 0007-1447 (ISSN-L)
- 0959-8138
- 1468-5833
- OpenAlex
- W2092198319
- Cited by
- 916
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 16.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Mammographic screening and mortality from breast cancer: the Malmö mammographic screening trial. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/bmj.297.6654.943
- The paper
- Andersson, I., Aspegren, K., Janzon, L., Landberg, T., Lindholm, K., Linell, F., Ljungberg, O., Ranstam, J., & Sigfússon, B. (1988). Mammographic screening and mortality from breast cancer: the Malmö mammographic screening trial. BMJ. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.297.6654.943
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.