The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Reevaluation of Risk of In Utero Exposure to Lithium
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To reevaluate the risk associated with in utero exposure to lithium. DATA SOURCES AND STUDY SELECTION: Data were obtained from all published studies, in multiple languages, referenced in MEDLINE, Toxline, and the Lithium Information Center databases. Unpublished studies were not included. The search terms were lithium, pregnancy, teratogen, abnormalities (drug induced), Ebstein's anomaly, and adverse effects. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: In the 1970s a very strong association was suggested between maternal lithium treatment during pregnancy and Ebstein's anomaly of the heart in the offspring. The relative risk for Ebstein's anomaly among such children was estimated to be 400 on the basis of data collected from a registry of voluntarily submitted cases. More recent controlled epidemiologic studies have consistently shown a lower risk. No women who took lithium during pregnancy were found among four case-control studies of Ebstein's anomaly involving 25, 34, 59, and 89 affected children, respectively. In two cohort studies, risk ratios of 3.0 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.2 to 7.7) and 1.5 (95% CI, 0.4 to 6.8) for all congenital anomalies have been observed. The risk ratios for cardiac malformations in these studies were 7.7 (95% CI, 1.5 to 41.2) and 1.2 (95% CI, 0.1 to 18.3), respectively. CONCLUSION: While initial information regarding the teratogenic risk of lithium treatment was derived from biased retrospective reports, more recent epidemiologic data indicate that the teratogenic risk of first-trimester lithium exposure is lower than previously suggested. The clinical management of women with bipolar disorder who have childbearing potential should be modified with this revised risk estimate.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results.
Rosenthal, R. (1979) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.86.3.638 · Cited by 9,068
Lifetime Prevalence of Specific Psychiatric Disorders in Three Sites
Robins, L. N. (1984) · Archives of General Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/archpsyc.1984.01790210031005 · Cited by 2,550
Lammer, E. J., Chen, D. T., Hoar, R. M., Agnish, N. D., Benke, P. J., Braun, J. T., Curry, C. J., Fernhoff, P. M., Grix, A. W., Lott, I. T., et al. (1985) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm198510033131401 · Cited by 1,942
THALIDOMIDE AND CONGENITAL ABNORMALITIES
Mcbride, W. G. (1961) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(61)90927-8 · Cited by 1,141
Risk of Recurrence Following Discontinuation of Lithium Treatment in Bipolar Disorder
Suppes, T. (1991) · Archives of General Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/archpsyc.1991.01810360046007 · Cited by 392
Outcome After Rapid vs Gradual Discontinuation of Lithium Treatment in Bipolar Disorders
Faedda, G. L. (1993) · Archives of General Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/archpsyc.1993.01820180046005 · Cited by 239
Cited by
Malhi, G. S., Bassett, D., Boyce, P., Bryant, R., Fitzgerald, P. B., Fritz, K., Hopwood, M., Lyndon, B., Mulder, R., Murray, G., et al. (2015) · Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1177/0004867415617657 · Cited by 842
“Lithium has also been associated with a small increased risk of foetal cardiac defects (Cohen et al., 1994) but a recent metaanalysis (McKnight et al.”
BackgroundJenkins, K. J., Correa, A., Feinstein, J. A., Botto, L., Britt, A. E., Daniels, S. R., Elixson, M., Warnes, C. A., & Webb, C. L. (2007) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/circulationaha.106.183216 · Cited by 818
Viguera, A. C., Whitfield, T., Baldessarini, R. J., Newport, D. J., Stowe, Z., Reminick, A., Zurick, A., & Cohen, L. S. (2007) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.2007.06101639 · Cited by 599
Self-citationViguera, A. C., Nonacs, R., Cohen, L. S., Tondo, L., Murray, A., & Baldessarini, R. J. (2000) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.157.2.179 · Cited by 488
Self-citationManagement of bipolar disorder during pregnancy and the postpartum period
Yonkers, K. A., Wisner, K. L., Stowe, Z., Leibenluft, E., Cohen, L., Miller, L., Manber, R., Viguera, A., Suppes, T., & Altshuler, L. (2004) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.161.4.608 · Cited by 394
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Cohen, L. S.
- Venue
- JAMA
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 1994-01-12
- Volume
- 271
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 146
- ISSN
- 0002-9955 (ISSN-L)
- 0098-7484
- OpenAlex
- W1994872919
- Cited by
- 475
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 19.23
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Reevaluation of Risk of In Utero Exposure to Lithium. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/jama.1994.03510260078033
- The paper
- Cohen, L. S. (1994). A Reevaluation of Risk of In Utero Exposure to Lithium. JAMA. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.1994.03510260078033
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.