Cited by 790Sepsis Diagnosis and TreatmentInflammation biomarkers and pathwaysAntibiotics Pharmacokinetics and Efficacy

Recombinant Human Interleukin 1 Receptor Antagonist in the Treatment of Patients With Sepsis Syndrome: Results From a Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial

Fisher, Charles J.·1994·JAMA

Abstract

Objective. —To further define the safety and efficacy of recombinant human interleukin 1 receptor antagonist (rhIL-1ra) in the treatment of sepsis syndrome. Study Design. —Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter, multinational clinical trial. Population. —A total of 893 patients with sepsis syndrome received an intravenous loading dose of rhIL-1ra, 100 mg, or placebo followed by a continuous 72-hour intravenous infusion of rhIL-1ra (1.0 or 2.0 mg/kg per hour) or placebo. Outcome Measure. —Twenty-eight—day all-cause mortality. Results. —There was not a significant increase in survival time for rhIL-1ra treatment compared with placebo among all patients who received the study medication (n=893; generalized Wilcoxon statistic,P=.22) or among patients with shock at study entry (n=713; generalized Wilcoxon statistic,P=.23), the two primary efficacy analyses specified a priori for this trial. Results from secondary analyses suggest an increase in survival time with rhIL-1ra treatment among patients with dysfunction of one or more organs (n=563; linear dose-response,P=.009). Retrospective analysis demonstrated an increase in survival time with rhIL-1ra treatment among patients with a predicted risk of mortality of 24% or greater (n=580; linear dose-response,P=.005) as well as among patients with both dysfunction of one or more organs and a predicted risk of mortality of 24% or greater (n=411; linear dose-response,P=.002). Conclusions. —There was not a statistically significant increase in survivial time for rhIL-1ra treatment compared with placebo among all patients who received the study medication or among patients with shock at study entry. Secondary and retrospective analyses of efficacy suggest that treatment with rhIL-1ra results in a dose-related increase in survival time among patients with sepsis who have organ dysfunction and/or a predicted risk of mortality of 24% or greater. (JAMA. 1994;271:1836-1843)

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/jama.1994.03510470040032

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Administration of monoclonal antibodies directed at specific cytokines and use of apheresis or medical devices to remove cytokines from circulation have had generally disappointing results in clinical trials for sepsis-associated cytokine storm.

    “The administration of monoclonal antibodies directed at specific cytokines and the use of apheresis or medical devices to remove cytokines from circulation have had generally disappointing results in clinical trials.62”

    From Cytokine storm (2020) · cites this paper as [62]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fisher, C. J.
Corresponding author
Fisher, Charles J.
Venue
JAMA
Published
1994-06-15
Volume
271
Issue
23
Pages
1836
ISSN
  • 0002-9955 (ISSN-L)
  • 0098-7484
OpenAlex
W4322697531
Cited by
790
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 28 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 32 · 2019: 23 · 2018: 24 · 2017: 22 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 30 · 2013: 20 · 2012: 22
FWCI
37.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
JAMA (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Inflammation biomarkers and pathways
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Antibiotics Pharmacokinetics and Efficacy
Keywords
sepsis, septic shock, survival, organ dysfunction, mortality risk, dose-response relationship, drug safety, cytokine inhibition

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review