The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Decline in Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery Mortality in New York State: The Role of Surgeon Volume
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To examine the longitudinal relationship between surgeon volume and in-hospital mortality for coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery in New York State and to explain changes in mortality that occurred over time. DESIGN: Observation of clinically risk-adjusted operative mortality over time. SETTING: All 30 New York State hospitals in which CABG surgery was performed for 1989 through 1992. PATIENTS: All 57,187 patients undergoing isolated CABG surgery in New York State in 1989 through 1992 in the 30 hospitals. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Actual, expected, and risk-adjusted mortality. RESULTS: Risk-adjusted in-hospital mortality decreased for all categories of surgeons. Low-volume surgeons (< or = 50 operations per year) experienced a 60% reduction in risk-adjusted mortality in the 4-year period, whereas the highest-volume surgeons (> 150 operations per year) experienced a 34% reduction. The percentage of patients undergoing CABG surgery by low-volume surgeons decreased from 7.6% in 1989 to 5.7% in 1992, a 25% decrease. CONCLUSIONS: The overall decline in risk-adjusted mortality could not be explained by shifts in patients away from low-volume surgeons to high-volume surgeons. The proportionately larger decrease in risk-adjusted mortality for low-volume surgeons could not be explained by changes in patient case mix or by improvements in the performance of surgeons with persistently low volumes. Part of the decrease was a result of the exodus of low-volume surgeons with high risk-adjusted mortality (in all years studied), the markedly better performance of surgeons who were new to the system (especially in 1991 and 1992), and the performance of surgeons who were not consistently low-volume surgeons (especially in 1992).
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Halm, E. A., Lee, C., & Chassin, M. R. (2002) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-137-6-200209170-00012 · Cited by 1,704
Analysis of errors reported by surgeons at three teaching hospitals
Gawande, A. A., Zinner, M. J., Studdert, D. M., & Brennan, T. A. (2003) · Surgery · doi:10.1067/msy.2003.169 · Cited by 1,082
2011 ACCF/AHA Guideline for Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery
Hillis, L. D., Smith, P. K., Anderson, J. L., Bittl, J. A., Bridges, C. R., Byrne, J. G., Cigarroa, J. E., DiSesa, V. J., Hiratzka, L. F., Hutter, A. M., et al. (2011) · Journal of the American College of Cardiology · doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2011.08.009 · Cited by 820
A systematic review of the impact of volume of surgery and specialization on patient outcome
Chowdhury, M. M., Dagash, H., & Pierro, A. (2007) · British Journal of Surgery · doi:10.1002/bjs.5714 · Cited by 608
Influence of Hospital Procedure Volume on Outcomes Following Surgery for Colon Cancer
Schrag, D. (2000) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.284.23.3028 · Cited by 490
Metadata
- Authors
- Hannan, E. L.
- Venue
- JAMA
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 1995-01-18
- Volume
- 273
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 209
- ISSN
- 0002-9955 (ISSN-L)
- 0098-7484
- OpenAlex
- W2015517780
- Cited by
- 334
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 25.40
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Decline in Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery Mortality in New York State: The Role of Surgeon Volume. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/jama.1995.03520270043029
- The paper
- Hannan, E. L. (1995). The Decline in Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery Mortality in New York State: The Role of Surgeon Volume. JAMA. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.1995.03520270043029
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.