The DOI matches its Crossref record; 40 of the 40 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Analysis of errors reported by surgeons at three teaching hospitals
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND Little is known of the factors that underlie surgical errors. Incident reporting has been proposed as a method of obtaining information about medical errors to help identify such factors. METHODS Between November 1, 2000, and March 15, 2001, we conducted confidential interviews with randomly selected surgeons from three Massachusetts teaching hospitals to elicit detailed reports on surgical adverse events resulting from errors in management ("incidents"). Data on the characteristics of the incidents and the factors that surgeons reported to have contributed to the errors were recorded and analyzed. RESULTS Among 45 surgeons approached for interviews, 38 (84%) agreed to participate and provided reports on 146 incidents. Thirty-three percent of incidents resulted in permanent disability and 13% in patient death. Seventy-seven percent involved injuries related to an operation or other invasive intervention (visceral injuries, bleeding, and wound infection/dehiscence were the most common subtypes), 13% involved unnecessary or inappropriate procedures, and 10% involved unnecessary advancement of disease. Two thirds of the incidents involved errors during the intraoperative phase of surgical care, 27% during preoperative management, and 22% during postoperative management. Two or more clinicians were cited as substantially contributing to errors in 70% of the incidents. The most commonly cited systems factors contributing to errors were inexperience/lack of competence in a surgical task (53% of incidents), communication breakdowns among personnel (43%), and fatigue or excessive workload (33%). Surgeons reported significantly more systems failures in incidents involving emergency surgical care than those involving nonemergency care (P <.001). CONCLUSIONS Subjective incident reports gathered through interviews allow identification of characteristics of surgical errors and their leading contributing factors, which may help target research and interventions to reduce such errors.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
To Err Is Human: Building a Safer Health System
(2000) · National Academies Press eBooks · doi:10.17226/9728 · Cited by 14,044
The critical incident technique.
Flanagan, J. C. (1954) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/h0061470 · Cited by 8,191
Wall, A. (2000) · British Journal of Healthcare Management · doi:10.12968/bjhc.2000.6.9.19311 · Cited by 5,903
(2007) · Encyclopedia of Industrial and Organizational Psychology · doi:10.4135/9781412952651.n55 · Cited by 5,287
Brennan, T. A., Leape, L. L., Laird, N. M., Hebert, L., Localio, A. R., Lawthers, A. G., Newhouse, J. P., Weiler, P. C., & Hiatt, H. H. (1991) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199102073240604 · Cited by 4,627
Self-citationLeape, L. L., Brennan, T. A., Laird, N., Lawthers, A. G., Localio, A. R., Barnes, B. A., Hebert, L., Newhouse, J. P., Weiler, P. C., & Hiatt, H. (1991) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199102073240605 · Cited by 3,711
Self-citationLeape, L. L. (1994) · PubMed · Cited by 1,961
Should Operations Be Regionalized?: The Empirical Relation between Surgical Volume and Mortality
Luft, H. S., Bunker, J. P., & Enthoven, A. C. (1979) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm197912203012503 · Cited by 1,759
Incidence and Types of Adverse Events and Negligent Care in Utah and Colorado
Thomas, E. J., Studdert, D. M., Burstin, H. R., Orav, E. J., Zeena, T., Williams, E. J., Howard, K. M., Weiler, P. C., & Brennan, T. A. (2000) · Medical Care · doi:10.1097/00005650-200003000-00003 · Cited by 1,673
Self-citationError, stress, and teamwork in medicine and aviation: cross sectional surveys
Sexton, J. B. (2000) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.320.7237.745 · Cited by 1,611
Cited by
Teamwork in healthcare: Key discoveries enabling safer, high-quality care.
Rosen, M. A., DiazGranados, D., Dietz, A. S., Benishek, L. E., Thompson, D., Pronovost, P. J., & Weaver, S. J. (2018) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/amp0000298 · Cited by 1,283
Patient complaints in healthcare systems: a systematic review and coding taxonomy
Reader, T. W., Gillespie, A., & Roberts, J. (2014) · BMJ Quality & Safety · doi:10.1136/bmjqs-2013-002437 · Cited by 420
Medical Errors Involving Trainees: A Study of Closed Malpractice Claims From 5 Insurers
Singh, H., Thomas, E. J., Petersen, L. A., & Studdert, D. M. (2007) · Archives of Internal Medicine · doi:10.1001/archinte.167.19.2030 · Cited by 407
Self-citationCore Principles & Values of Effective Team-Based Health Care
University of Washington, Mitchell, P. H., Wynia, M. K., American Medical Association, Golden, R., Rush University Medical Center, McNellis, B., American Academy of Physician Assistants, Okun, S., PatientsLikeMe, et al. (2012) · NAM Perspectives · doi:10.31478/201210c · Cited by 349
Clinical Review: Checklists—Translating Evidence into Practice
Winters, B. D., Gurses, A. P., Lehmann, H., Sexton, J. B., Rampersad, C., & Pronovost, P. J. (2009) · Critical Care · doi:10.1186/cc7792 · Cited by 348
Metadata
- Authors
- Gawande, A. A., Zinner, M. J., Studdert, D. M., & Brennan, T. A.
- Venue
- Surgery
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2003-06
- Volume
- 133
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 614-621
- ISSN
- 0039-6060 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2115120145
- Cited by
- 1,082
- References
- 40
- FWCI
- 17.17
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Analysis of errors reported by surgeons at three teaching hospitals. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1067/msy.2003.169
- The paper
- Gawande, A. A., Zinner, M. J., Studdert, D. M., & Brennan, T. A. (2003). Analysis of errors reported by surgeons at three teaching hospitals. Surgery. https://doi.org/10.1067/msy.2003.169
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.