Cited by 18Pain Management and Placebo EffectStatistical Methods in Clinical TrialsEthics in Clinical Research

The importance of placebo effects

Cleophas, Ton J. M.·1995·JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association

Abstract

To the Editor. —The issue of bias was not raised in the otherwise excellent article by Dr Turner and colleagues1on placebo effects. The point is that the placebo arm of a trial is particularly vulnerable to specific types of bias. In clinical trials, as opposed to regular patient care, patients are generally highly compliant and have a good feeling about the trial because they think it will provide something from which they can benefit. They also do not want to disappoint the investigators who have taken so much interest in them. This wish not to disappoint may produce an enhanced placebo effect on the part of the participants. Investigators, on the other hand, may find it difficult or impossible to tell the complete truth about the dummy2and usually exaggerate the potential of the trial. Furthermore, many phase IV trials do not include a written informed consent

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/jama.1995.03520280027021

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The context surrounding treatment delivery can allow placebo effects to improve care benefits.

    “There is an increasing body of literature suggesting that placebo effects can enhance the therapeutic benefits of care through the context in which the treatment is administered (Brody and Miller, 2011; Cleophas, 1995; de la Fuente-fernandex et al., 2002; Di Blasi et al., 2001; Finniss et al., 2010; Kaptchuk, 1998; Price et al., 2008; Thomas, 1994).”

    From Distinct neural representations of placebo and nocebo effects (2015) · cites this paper as Cleophas, 1995

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cleophas, T. J. M.
Corresponding author
Cleophas, Ton J. M.
Venue
JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association
Published
1995-01-25
Volume
273
Issue
4
Pages
283
ISSN
  • 0002-9955 (ISSN-L)
  • 0098-7484
OpenAlex
W2030943975
Cited by
18
References
5
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1
FWCI
0.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • JAMA (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Pain Management and Placebo Effect
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ethics in Clinical Research
Keywords
placebo effect, bias in clinical trials, placebo arm, medication adherence, investigator bias, informed consent
MeSH terms
Clinical Trials as Topic, Humans, Placebos

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review