The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Antibiotics in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Exacerbations: A Meta-analysis
Abstract
Objective. —A meta-analysis of randomized trials was performed to estimate the effectiveness of antibiotics in treating exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Data Sources. —English-language studies published from 1955 through 1994 were retrieved using MEDLINE,Index Medicus, bibliographies, and consultation with experts. MEDLINE search terms included "COPD," "chronic bronchitis," and "antibiotic(s)." Study Selection. —Only randomized trials that enrolled patients having an exacerbation of COPD, used an antibiotic in the treatment group and placebo in the control group, and provided sufficient data to calculate an effect size were included in the meta-analysis. Data Extraction. —Descriptive and outcome data from each study were independently abstracted by two authors. Data Synthesis. —Overall summary effect size of the nine trials satisfying all inclusion criteria was 0.22 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.10 to 0.34), indicating a small benefit in the antibiotic-treated group. Similar analysis of the six studies that provided data on peak expiratory flow rate changes revealed a summary effect size of 0.19 (95% CI, 0.03 to 0.35) and a summary change in peak expiratory flow rate of 10.75 L/min (95% CI, 4.96 to 16.54 L/min) in favor of the antibiotic-treated group. Sensitivity analyses did not significantly affect these results. Conclusions. —These analyses suggest a small but statistically significant improvement due to antibiotic therapy in patients with exacerbations of COPD. This antibiotic-associated improvement may be clinically significant, especially in patients with low baseline flow rates. (JAMA. 1995;273:957-960)
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Vestbo, J., Hurd, S. S., Agustí, A. G., Jones, P. W., Vogelmeier, C., Anzueto, A., Barnes, P. J., Fabbri, L. M., Martinez, F. J., Nishimura, M., et al. (2013) · American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine · doi:10.1164/rccm.201204-0596pp · Cited by 15,983
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
Barnes, P. J. (2000) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm200007273430407 · Cited by 1,078
Infections and Airway Inflammation in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Severe Exacerbations
Papi, A., Bellettato, C. M., Braccioni, F., Romagnoli, M., Casolari, P., Caramori, G., Fabbri, L. M., & Johnston, S. L. (2006) · American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine · doi:10.1164/rccm.200506-859oc · Cited by 1,072
Seneff, M. G. (1995) · JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association · doi:10.1001/jama.1995.03530230038027 · Cited by 593
Antibiotic Treatment of Exacerbations of COPD
Stolz, D., Christ-Crain, M., Bingisser, R., Leuppi, J., Miedinger, D., Müller, C., Huber, P., Müller, B., & Tamm, M. (2007) · Chest · doi:10.1378/chest.06-1500 · Cited by 521
Metadata
- Authors
- Saint, S.
- Venue
- JAMA
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 1995-03-22
- Volume
- 273
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 957
- ISSN
- 0002-9955 (ISSN-L)
- 0098-7484
- OpenAlex
- W4360754385
- Cited by
- 365
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 16.65
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Antibiotics in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Exacerbations: A Meta-analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/jama.1995.03520360071042
- The paper
- Saint, S. (1995). Antibiotics in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Exacerbations: A Meta-analysis. JAMA. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.1995.03520360071042
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.