The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Accuracy of Drug Information From Pharmaceutical Sales Representatives
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To provide quantitative data about the accuracy of the information about drugs presented to physicians by pharmaceutical sales representatives. DESIGN: One hundred six statements about drugs made during 13 presentations by pharmaceutical representatives were analyzed for accuracy. Statements were rated inaccurate if they contradicted the 1993 Physicians' Desk Reference or material quoted or handed out by the sales representative. SETTING: University teaching hospital. RESULTS: Twelve (11%) of 106 statements about drugs were inaccurate. All 12 inaccurate statements were favorable toward the promoted drug, whereas 39 (49%) of 79 accurate statements were favorable (P = .005). None of 15 statements about competitors' drugs were favorable, but all were accurate, significantly P < .001) differing from statements about promoted drugs. In a survey of 27 physicians who attended these presentations, seven (26%) recalled any false statement made by a pharmaceutical representative, and 10 (37%) said information from the representatives influenced the way they prescribed drugs. CONCLUSIONS: Eleven percent of the statements made by pharmaceutical representatives about drugs contradicted information readily available to them. Physicians generally failed to recognize the inaccurate statements.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Spurling, G. K., Mansfield, P. R., Montgomery, B. D., Lexchin, J., Doust, J., Othman, N., & Vitry, A. I. (2010) · PLoS Medicine · doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1000352 · Cited by 526
DeJong, C., Aguilar, T., Tseng, C.-W., Lin, G. A., Boscardin, W. J., & Dudley, R. A. (2016) · JAMA Internal Medicine · doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2016.2765 · Cited by 517
Katz, D., Caplan, A. L., & Merz, J. F. (2010) · The American Journal of Bioethics · doi:10.1080/15265161.2010.519226 · Cited by 355
Fickweiler, F., Fickweiler, W., & Urbach, E. (2017) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016408 · Cited by 293
Katz, D., Caplan, A. L., & Merz, J. F. (2003) · The American Journal of Bioethics · doi:10.1162/15265160360706552 · Cited by 250
Metadata
- Authors
- Ziegler, M. G.
- Venue
- JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 1995-04-26
- Volume
- 273
- Issue
- 16
- Pages
- 1296
- ISSN
- 0002-9955 (ISSN-L)
- 0098-7484
- OpenAlex
- W2078306700
- Cited by
- 297
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.44
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Accuracy of Drug Information From Pharmaceutical Sales Representatives. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/jama.1995.03520400066047
- The paper
- Ziegler, M. G. (1995). The Accuracy of Drug Information From Pharmaceutical Sales Representatives. JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.1995.03520400066047
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.