The DOI matches its Crossref record; 60 of the 60 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Interactions between physicians and the pharmaceutical industry generally and sales representatives specifically and their association with physicians’ attitudes and prescribing habits: a systematic review
Open accessAbstract
Objectives: The objective of this review is to explore interactions between physicians and the pharmaceutical industry including sales representatives and their impact on physicians’ attitude and prescribing habits. Data sources: PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library and Google scholar electronic databases were searched from 1992 to August 2016 using free-text words and medical subject headings relevant to the topic. Study selection: Studies included cross-sectional studies, cohort studies, randomised trials and survey designs. Studies with narrative reviews, case reports, opinion polls and letters to the editor were excluded from data synthesis. Data extraction: Two reviewers independently extracted the data. Data on study design, study year, country, participant characteristics, setting and number of participants were collected. Data synthesis: Pharmaceutical industry and pharmaceutical sales representative (PSR) interactions influence physicians’ attitudes and their prescribing behaviour and increase the number of formulary addition requests for the company’s drug. Conclusion: Physician–pharmaceutical industry and its sales representative’s interactions and acceptance of gifts from the company’s PSRs have been found to affect physicians’ prescribing behaviour and are likely to contribute to irrational prescribing of the company’s drug. Therefore, intervention in the form of policy implementation and education about the implications of these interactions is needed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Dermyshi, E., Wang, Y., Yan, C., Hong, W., Qiu, G., Gong, X., & Zhang, T. (2017) · Neonatology · doi:10.1159/000454668 · Cited by 24,451
GRADE guidelines: 1. Introduction—GRADE evidence profiles and summary of findings tables
Guyatt, G., Oxman, A. D., Akl, E. A., Kunz, R., Vist, G., Brozek, J., Norris, S., Falck-Ytter, Y., Glasziou, P., & deBeer, H. (2011) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.04.026 · Cited by 10,681
Physicians and the Pharmaceutical Industry: Is a Gift Ever Just a Gift?
Wazana, A. (2000) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.283.3.373 · Cited by 1,415
Brennan, T. A., Rothman, D. J., Blank, L., Blumenthal, D., Chimonas, S. C., Cohen, J. J., Goldman, J., Kassirer, J. P., Kimball, H., Naughton, J., et al. (2006) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.295.4.429 · Cited by 695
Spurling, G. K., Mansfield, P. R., Montgomery, B. D., Lexchin, J., Doust, J., Othman, N., & Vitry, A. I. (2010) · PLoS Medicine · doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1000352 · Cited by 526
DeJong, C., Aguilar, T., Tseng, C.-W., Lin, G. A., Boscardin, W. J., & Dudley, R. A. (2016) · JAMA Internal Medicine · doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2016.2765 · Cited by 517
Chren, M. M. (1994) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.271.9.684 · Cited by 397
The Effects of Pharmaceutical Firm Enticements on Physician Prescribing Patterns
Orlowski, J. P., & Wateska, L. (1992) · Chest · doi:10.1378/chest.102.1.270 · Cited by 384
Steinman, M. A., Shlipak, M. G., & McPhee, S. J. (2001) · The American Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1016/s0002-9343(01)00660-x · Cited by 383
The Accuracy of Drug Information From Pharmaceutical Sales Representatives
Ziegler, M. G. (1995) · JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association · doi:10.1001/jama.1995.03520400066047 · Cited by 297
Metadata
- Authors
- Fickweiler, F., Fickweiler, W., & Urbach, E.
- Venue
- BMJ Open
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 2017-09
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- e016408
- ISSN
- 2044-6055 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2759900990
- Cited by
- 293
- References
- 60
- FWCI
- 6.27
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Interactions between physicians and the pharmaceutical industry generally and sales representatives specifically and their association with physicians’ attitudes and prescribing habits: a systematic review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016408
- The paper
- Fickweiler, F., Fickweiler, W., & Urbach, E. (2017). Interactions between physicians and the pharmaceutical industry generally and sales representatives specifically and their association with physicians’ attitudes and prescribing habits: a systematic review. BMJ Open. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016408
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.