The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Community-Based Prevalence of Anal Incontinence
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To determine the prevalence of and characteristics associated with anal incontinence in the general community. SETTING: Community survey. PARTICIPANTS: The population of the state of Wisconsin sampled in the Wisconsin Family Health Survey. Subjects were identified by random digit dialing with telephone interview. The individual within each household identified as most knowledgeable about the health status of all other members of the household was asked about the health status of each member of the household. Approximately 200 households were surveyed each month. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The presence of anal incontinence to solid or liquid feces or gas, who suffered from it, the frequency of anal incontinence, and how the incontinent person coped with it. RESULTS: A total of 2570 households comprising 6959 individuals were surveyed, and 153 individuals were reported to have anal incontinence, representing 2.2% of the population (95% confidence interval [Cl], +/- 0.3%). Thirty percent of the incontinent subjects were older than 65 years, and 63% were women. Of those with anal incontinence, 36% were incontinent to solid feces, 54% to liquid feces, and 60% to gas. In a multivariate analysis, independent associations of the following risk factors with anal incontinence were found: female sex (odds ratio [OR], 1.5; Cl, 1.1 to 2.1), age (continuously adjusted) (OR, 1.01; Cl, 1.01 to 1.02), physical limitations (OR, 1.8; Cl, 1.2 to 2.7), and poor general health (OR, 1.6; Cl, 1.4 to 1.9). CONCLUSIONS: Anal incontinence was reported in 2.2% of the general population. Independent risk factors for incontinence include female sex, advancing age, poor general health, and physical limitations.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Drossman, D. A., Li, Z., Andruzzi, E., Temple, R. D., Talley, N. J., Grant Thompson, W., Whitehead, W. E., Janssens, J., Funch-Jensen, P., Corazziari, E., et al. (1993) · Digestive Diseases and Sciences · doi:10.1007/bf01303162 · Cited by 2,198
Cited by
Prevalence of symptomatic pelvic floor disorders in US women
Nygaard, I. (2008) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.300.11.1311 · Cited by 1,869
Wexner, S. D., Coller, J. A., Devroede, G., Hull, T., McCallum, R., Chan, M., Ayscue, J. M., Shobeiri, A. S., Margolin, D., England, M., et al. (2010) · Annals of Surgery · doi:10.1097/sla.0b013e3181cf8ed0 · Cited by 351
Pathophysiology and management of bowel dysfunction in multiple sclerosis
Wiesel, P. H., Norton, C., Glickman, S., & Kamm, M. A. (2001) · European Journal of Gastroenterology & Hepatology · doi:10.1097/00042737-200104000-00025 · Cited by 121
Castori, M., Morlino, S., Pascolini, G., Blundo, C., & Grammatico, P. (2015) · American Journal of Medical Genetics Part C: Seminars in Medical Genetics · doi:10.1002/ajmg.c.31431 · Cited by 98
Fecal incontinence in the elderly patient
Tariq, S. H., Morley, J. E., & Prather, C. M. (2003) · The American Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1016/s0002-9343(03)00327-9 · Cited by 49
Metadata
- Authors
- Nelson, R.
- Venue
- JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 1995-08-16
- Volume
- 274
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 559
- ISSN
- 0002-9955 (ISSN-L)
- 0098-7484
- OpenAlex
- W2061093714
- Cited by
- 709
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 6.85
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Community-Based Prevalence of Anal Incontinence. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/jama.1995.03530070057030
- The paper
- Nelson, R. (1995). Community-Based Prevalence of Anal Incontinence. JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.1995.03530070057030
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.