The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Serum Gonadotropins and Steroid Hormones and the Development of Ovarian Cancer
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To prospectively examine the association between endogenous hormones and development of ovarian cancer. DESIGN: Nested case-control study. SETTING: A population-based serum bank in Washington County, Maryland. PARTICIPANTS: Serum samples were collected in 1974 from 20305 county residents and stored at -70 degrees C. From 1975 through 1989, a total of 31 cases of ovarian cancer were identified in women who were not taking hormones at the time of blood collection. These cases were matched to 62 controls on age, menopausal status, and, for premenopausal women, number of days from the beginning of the last menstrual period. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Prediagnostic endogenous hormone levels of cases and controls were compared. RESULTS: Mean follicle-stimulating hormone levels were lower among cases (43.3 IU/L) compared with controls (54.4 IU/L) (P = .04), and increasing levels were associated with significantly lower risk (P for trend = .01), particularly among postmenopausal women. Luteinizing hormone levels were 9% lower among cases than controls, but the difference was not statistically significant (P = .39). Compared with controls, cases had higher androstenedione levels (4.5 nmol/L vs 3.3 nmol; P = .03) and higher dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA) levels (15.9 nmol/L vs 9.7 nmol/L; P = .02). The risk of ovarian cancer increased with higher levels of androstenedione and DHEA sulfate (P for trend = .008 and .11, respectively). These associations were not materially different between premenopausal and postmenopausal women. CONCLUSION: The results suggest that women with low serum gonadotropin levels or high androgen levels have an increased risk of ovarian cancer. These findings do not support the hypothesis that pituitary gonadotropins increase the risk of ovarian cancer. Replication of the study in other populations is highly desirable.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Ovarian Tumors in a Cohort of Infertile Women
Rossing, M. A., Daling, J. R., Weiss, N. S., Moore, D. E., & Self, S. G. (1994) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199409223311204 · Cited by 721
Cited by
Risch, H. A. (1998) · JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute · doi:10.1093/jnci/90.23.1774 · Cited by 771
Obesity and the risk of epithelial ovarian cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Olsen, C. M., Green, A. C., Whiteman, D. C., Sadeghi, S., Kolahdooz, F., & Webb, P. M. (2007) · European Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1016/j.ejca.2006.11.010 · Cited by 337
Epithelial Ovarian Cancer Risk Among Women With Polycystic Ovary Syndrome
SCHILDKRAUT, J. (1996) · Obstetrics & Gynecology · doi:10.1016/0029-7844(96)00226-8 · Cited by 337
The role of the fallopian tube in the origin of ovarian cancer
Erickson, B. K., Conner, M. G., & Landen, C. N. (2013) · American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2013.04.019 · Cited by 286
THE EPIDEMIOLOGY OF POLYCYSTIC OVARY SYNDROME
Solomon, C. G. (1999) · Endocrinology and Metabolism Clinics of North America · doi:10.1016/s0889-8529(05)70069-4 · Cited by 226
Metadata
- Authors
- Helzlsouer, K. J.
- Venue
- JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 1995-12-27
- Volume
- 274
- Issue
- 24
- Pages
- 1926
- ISSN
- 0002-9955 (ISSN-L)
- 0098-7484
- OpenAlex
- W2005140082
- Cited by
- 264
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 4.32
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Serum Gonadotropins and Steroid Hormones and the Development of Ovarian Cancer. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/jama.1995.03530240036037
- The paper
- Helzlsouer, K. J. (1995). Serum Gonadotropins and Steroid Hormones and the Development of Ovarian Cancer. JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.1995.03530240036037
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.