The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Concurrent Lyme Disease and Babesiosis: Evidence for Increased Severity and Duration of Illness
Abstract
Objective. —To determine whether patients coinfected with Lyme disease and babesiosis in sites where both diseases are zoonotic experience a greater number of symptoms for a longer period of time than those with either infection alone. Design. —Community-based yearly serosurvey and clinic-based cohort study. Setting. —Island community in Rhode Island and 2 Connecticut medical clinics from 1990 to 1994. Study Participants. —Long-term residents of the island community and patients seeking treatment at the clinics. Main Outcome Measures. —Seroreactivity to the agents of Lyme disease and babesiosis and number and duration of symptoms. Results. —Of 1156 serosurvey subjects, 97 (8.4%) were seroreactive against Lyme disease spirochete antigen, of whom 14(14%) also were seroreactive against babesial antigen. Of 240 patients diagnosed with Lyme disease, 26 (11%) were coinfected with babesiosis. Coinfected patients experienced fatigue (P=.002), headache (P<.001), sweats (P<.001), chills (P=.03), anorexia (P=.04), emotional lability (P=.02), nausea (P=.004), conjunctivitis (P=.04), and splenomegaly (P=.01) more frequently than those with Lyme disease alone. Thirteen (50%) of 26 coinfected patients were symptomatic for 3 months or longer compared with 7 (4%) of the 184 patients with Lyme disease alone from whom follow-up data were available (P<.001). Patients coinfected with Lyme disease experienced more symptoms and a more persistent episode of illness than did those (n=10) experiencing babesial infection alone. Circulating spirochetal DNA was detected more than 3 times as often in coinfected patients as in those with Lyme disease alone (P=.06). Conclusions. —Approximately 10% of patients with Lyme disease in southern New England are coinfected with babesiosis in sites where both diseases are zoonotic. The number of symptoms and duration of illness in patients with concurrent Lyme disease and babesiosis are greater than in patients with either infection alone. In areas where both Lyme disease and babesiosis have been reported, the possibility of concomitant babesial infection should be considered when moderate to severe Lyme disease has been diagnosed. (JAMA. 1996;275:1657-1660)
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Homer, M. J., Aguilar-Delfin, I., Telford, S. R., Krause, P. J., & Persing, D. H. (2000) · Clinical Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1128/cmr.13.3.451 · Cited by 528
Self-citationLiegner, K. B. (2019) · Antibiotics · doi:10.3390/antibiotics8020072 · Cited by 35
Metadata
- Authors
- Krause, P. J.
- Venue
- JAMA
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 1996-06-05
- Volume
- 275
- Issue
- 21
- Pages
- 1657
- ISSN
- 0002-9955 (ISSN-L)
- 0098-7484
- OpenAlex
- W4322703230
- Cited by
- 351
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.99
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Concurrent Lyme Disease and Babesiosis: Evidence for Increased Severity and Duration of Illness. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/jama.1996.03530450047031
- The paper
- Krause, P. J. (1996). Concurrent Lyme Disease and Babesiosis: Evidence for Increased Severity and Duration of Illness. JAMA. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.1996.03530450047031
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.