The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Career Development for Women in Academic Medicine: Multiple Interventions in a Department of Medicine
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To determine the gender-based career obstacles for women in an academic department of medicine and to report the interventions to correct such obstacles (resulting from the evaluation) and the results of these interventions. DESIGN: Intervention study, before-after trial, with assessment of faculty concerns and perceived change through structured, self-administered questionnaires. SETTING: The Department of Medicine, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Md. PARTICIPANTS: Full-time faculty. INTERVENTIONS: Multifaceted intervention from 1990 through 1995 to correct gender-based career obstacles reported by women faculty, including problem identification, leadership, and education of faculty, and interventions to improve faculty development, mentoring, and rewards and to reduce isolation and structural career impediments. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Retention and promotion of deserving women faculty, salary equity, quality of mentoring, decreased isolation from information and colleagues, integration of women faculty into the scientific community, and decreased manifestations of gender bias. RESULTS: Junior women were retained and promoted, reversing previous experience, with a 550% increase in the number of women at the associate professor rank over 5 years (from 4 in 1990 to 26 in 1995). Interim 3-year follow-up showed a 183% increase in the proportion of women faculty who expected they would still be in academic medicine in 10 years (from 23% [7/30] in 1990 to 65% [30/46] in 1993). One half to two thirds of women faculty reported improvements in timeliness of promotions, manifestations of gender bias, access to information needed for faculty development, isolation, and salary equity. Men also reported improvements in these areas. CONCLUSIONS: The outcomes reported here indicate that it is possible to make substantive improvements in the development of women's careers, that an institutional strategy to this end can be successful in retaining women in academic medicine, and that such interventions are likely to benefit all faculty. Long-term interventions appear essential.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Mentoring in Academic Medicine: A Systematic Review
Sambunjak, D., Straus, S. E., & Marušić, A. (2006) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.296.9.1103 · Cited by 1,689
Sex Differences in Physician Salary in US Public Medical Schools
Jena, A. B., Olenski, A. R., & Blumenthal, D. M. (2016) · JAMA Internal Medicine · doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2016.3284 · Cited by 641
Sex Differences in Academic Rank in US Medical Schools in 2014
Jena, A. B., Khullar, D., Ho, O., Olenski, A. R., & Blumenthal, D. M. (2015) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2015.10680 · Cited by 584
Penalizing Men Who Request a Family Leave: Is Flexibility Stigma a Femininity Stigma?
Rudman, L. A., & Mescher, K. (2013) · Journal of Social Issues · doi:10.1111/josi.12017 · Cited by 566
Exploring the Color of Glass: Letters of Recommendation for Female and Male Medical Faculty
TRIX, F., & PSENKA, C. (2003) · Discourse & Society · doi:10.1177/0957926503014002277 · Cited by 553
Metadata
- Authors
- Fried, L. P.
- Venue
- JAMA
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 1996-09-18
- Volume
- 276
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 898
- ISSN
- 0002-9955 (ISSN-L)
- 0098-7484
- OpenAlex
- W2094484776
- Cited by
- 292
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 25.20
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Career Development for Women in Academic Medicine: Multiple Interventions in a Department of Medicine. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/jama.1996.03540110052031
- The paper
- Fried, L. P. (1996). Career Development for Women in Academic Medicine: Multiple Interventions in a Department of Medicine. JAMA. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.1996.03540110052031
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.