Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 360

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 26 of the 26 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Streptokinase for Acute Ischemic Stroke With Relationship to Time of Administration

Open access
Donnan, Geoffrey A.·1996·JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association

Abstract

Objectives. —To determine whether the administration of 1.5 million units of streptokinase intravenously within 4 hours of the onset of acute ischemic stroke would reduce morbidity and mortality at 3 months and whether outcomes may be better for those receiving therapy within 3 hours of stroke onset compared with those receiving it after 3 hours. Design. —Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial with 3-month follow-up. Participants. —A total of 340 patients, aged 18 to 85 years, with moderate to severe strokes were randomized from 40 centers throughout Australia from June 1992 to November 1994. Intervention. —Administration of 1.5 million units of streptokinase or placebo intravenously in 100 mL of normal saline over 1 hour. Main Outcome Measure. —Combined death and disability score (Barthel index <60) 3 months after the stroke. Results. —Using an intention-to-treat analysis with a combined death and disability score at 3 months after stroke as the primary end point, we found a nonsignificant overall trend toward unfavorable outcomes for streptokinase vs placebo (relative risk [RR] of unfavorable outcome, 1.08; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.74-1.58) and an excess of hematomas (13.2% [12.6% symptomatic] in the treated group, 3% [2.4% symptomatic] for placebo [P<.01] ). However, poor outcomes were confined to patients receiving therapy more than 3 hours after stroke onset (RR of unfavorable outcome, 1.22; 95% CI, 0.80-1.86). In contrast, among the 70 patients who were entered into the trial within 3 hours of stroke onset, there was a trend toward improved outcomes for those who received streptokinase (RR of unfavorable outcome, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.28-1.58), and this outcome pattern was significantly better than for those receiving therapy after 3 hours (P=.04). Streptokinase administration resulted in excess deaths in the group treated after 3 hours (RR, 1.98; 95% CI, 1.18-3.35), but not among those treated within 3 hours (RR, 1.11; 95% CI, 0.38-3.21). Conclusion. —The administration of streptokinase within 4 hours of acute ischemic stroke increased morbidity and mortality at 3 months. While treatment within 3 hours of stroke was safer and associated with significantly better outcomes than later treatment, it showed no significant benefit over placebo. The timing of thrombolytic therapy for acute stroke is critical.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/jama.1996.03540120039031

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 26 references

Cited by

See all 360

Metadata

Authors
Donnan, G. A.
Venue
JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association
Published
1996-09-25
Volume
276
Issue
12
Pages
961
ISSN
  • 0002-9955 (ISSN-L)
  • 0098-7484
OpenAlex
W1966175035
Cited by
360
References
26
FWCI
34.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Streptokinase for Acute Ischemic Stroke With Relationship to Time of Administration. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/jama.1996.03540120039031
The paper
Donnan, G. A. (1996). Streptokinase for Acute Ischemic Stroke With Relationship to Time of Administration. JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.1996.03540120039031

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.