Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 259

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Comparative Effect on Bone Density, Endometrium, and Lipids of Continuous Hormones as Replacement Therapy (CHART Study): A Randomized Controlled Trial

Speroff, Leon·1996·JAMA

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare the effect of continuous norethindrone acetate (NA)-ethinyl estradiol (EE2) combinations with matching unopposed EE2 or placebo. DESIGN: A 2-year, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group clinical trial. SETTING: Outpatients at 65 centers. PATIENTS: Asymptomatic or mildly symptomatic women aged 40 years or older who had undergone the onset of spontaneous menopause within the last 5 years and who had an intact uterus. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were equally randomized to placebo or 1 of 8 treatment groups: 0.2 mg of NA and 1 microg of EE2; 0.5 mg of NA and 2.5 microg of EE2; 1 mg of NA and 5 microg of EE2; 1 mg of NA and 10 microg of EE2; 1 microg of EE2; 2.5 microg of EE2; 5 microg of EE2; or 10 microg of EE2. PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Bone mineral density (BMD) measured by quantitative computed tomography, serum lipids, and endometrial effects as assessed by rate of hyperplasia and proliferative status. RESULTS: Twelve hundred sixty-five patients entered the study. Bone mineral density increased significantly from baseline (P<.001) in the 1 mg NA-5 microg EE2 and the 1 mg NA-10 microg EE2 treatment groups at each annual assessment. Among the unopposed EE2 groups, only the 10-microg group had increased BMD above baseline, but also was accompanied by an unacceptably high rate of endometrial hyperplasia. The NA-EE2 treatment groups had a significant linear dose-response trend for increasing BMD. Increased endometrial proliferation and hyperplasia occurred with increasing unopposed estrogen doses. The combination of NA and EE2 effectively protected the endometrium against hyperplasia. The percentage of change in the ratio of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol to low-density lipoprotein cholesterol was positive for all treatment groups. The increase in triglyceride levels associated with EE2 was attenuated with NA-EE2 treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Daily treatment with NA-EE2 was well tolerated and protected the endometrium from EE2-induced proliferation and hyperplasia. The NA-EE2 treatments produced a dose-related significant increase in BMD that was not present with unopposed EE2 treatment. The overall effect of NA-EE2 treatments on lipid measures was favorable.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/jama.1996.03540170041030

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 259

Metadata

Authors
Speroff, L.
Venue
JAMA
Published
1996-11-06
Volume
276
Issue
17
Pages
1397
ISSN
  • 0002-9955 (ISSN-L)
  • 0098-7484
OpenAlex
W2031570803
Cited by
259
References
1
FWCI
12.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Comparative Effect on Bone Density, Endometrium, and Lipids of Continuous Hormones as Replacement Therapy (CHART Study): A Randomized Controlled Trial. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/jama.1996.03540170041030
The paper
Speroff, L. (1996). The Comparative Effect on Bone Density, Endometrium, and Lipids of Continuous Hormones as Replacement Therapy (CHART Study): A Randomized Controlled Trial. JAMA. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.1996.03540170041030

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.