The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Circumcision in the United States: Prevalence, Prophylactic Effects, and Sexual Practice
Abstract
Objective. —To assess the prevalence of circumcision across various social groups and examine the health and sexual outcomes of circumcision. Design. —An analysis of data from the National Health and Social Life Survey. Participants. —A national probability sample of 1410 American men aged 18 to 59 years at the time of the survey. In addition, an oversample of black and Hispanic minority groups is included in comparative analyses. Main Outcome Measures. —The contraction of sexually transmitted diseases, the experience of sexual dysfunction, and experience with a series of sexual practices. Results. —We find no significant differences between circumcised and uncircumcised men in their likelihood of contracting sexually transmitted diseases. However, uncircumcised men appear slightly more likely to experience sexual dysfunctions, especially later in life. Finally, we find that circumcised men engage in a more elaborated set of sexual practices. This pattern differs across ethnic groups, suggesting the influence of social factors. Conclusions. —The National Health and Social Life Survey evidence indicates a slight benefit of circumcision but a negligible association with most outcomes. These findings inform existing debates on the utility of circumcision. The considerable impact of circumcision status on sexual practice represents a new finding that should further enrich such discussion. Our results support the view that physicians and parents be informed of the potential benefits and risks before circumcising newborns.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Prevalence of Urinary Tract Infection in Childhood: A Meta-Analysis
Shaikh, N., Morone, N. E., Bost, J. E., & Farrell, M. H. (2008) · Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal · doi:10.1097/inf.0b013e31815e4122 · Cited by 943
HIV Among Black Men Who Have Sex with Men (MSM) in the United States: A Review of the Literature
Maulsby, C., Millett, G., Lindsey, K., Kelley, R., Johnson, K., Montoya, D., & Holtgrave, D. (2014) · AIDS and Behavior · doi:10.1007/s10461-013-0476-2 · Cited by 337
Male circumcision: assessment of health benefits and risks.
Moses, S., Bailey, R. C., & Ronald, A. R. (1998) · Sexually Transmitted Infections · doi:10.1136/sti.74.5.368 · Cited by 317
Metadata
- Authors
- Laumann, E. O.
- Venue
- JAMA
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 1997-04-02
- Volume
- 277
- Issue
- 13
- Pages
- 1052
- ISSN
- 0002-9955 (ISSN-L)
- 0098-7484
- OpenAlex
- W4323238178
- Cited by
- 222
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.62
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Circumcision in the United States: Prevalence, Prophylactic Effects, and Sexual Practice. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/jama.1997.03540370042034
- The paper
- Laumann, E. O. (1997). Circumcision in the United States: Prevalence, Prophylactic Effects, and Sexual Practice. JAMA. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.1997.03540370042034
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.