The DOI matches its Crossref record; 41 of the 41 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Male circumcision: assessment of health benefits and risks.
Open accessAbstract
OBJECTIVES: Globally approximately 25% of men are circumcised for religious, cultural, medical, or parental choice reasons. However, controversy surrounds the procedure, and its benefits and risks to health. We review current knowledge of the health benefits and risks associated with male circumcision. METHODS: We have used, where available, previously conducted reviews of the relation between male circumcision and specific outcomes as "benchmarks", and updated them by searching the Medline database for more recent information. RESULTS: There is substantial evidence that circumcision protects males from HIV infection, penile carcinoma, urinary tract infections, and ulcerative sexually transmitted diseases. We could find little scientific evidence of adverse effects on sexual, psychological, or emotional health. Surgical risks associated with circumcision, particularly bleeding, penile injury, and local infection, as well as the consequences of the pain experienced with neonatal circumcision, are valid concerns that require appropriate responses. CONCLUSION: Further analyses of the utility and cost effectiveness of male circumcision as a preventive health measure should, in the light of this information, be research and policy priorities. A decision as to whether to recommend male circumcision in a given society should be based upon an assessment of the risk for and occurrence of the diseases which are associated with the presence of the foreskin, versus the risk of the complications of the procedure. In order for individuals and their families to make an informed decision, they should be provided with the best available evidence regarding the known benefits and risks.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Effect of neonatal circumcision on pain response during subsequent routine vaccination
Taddio, A., Katz, J., Ilersich, A. L., & Koren, G. (1997) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(96)10316-0 · Cited by 1,218
Cameron, D. W., D'Costa, L., Maitha, G., Cheang, M., Piot, P., Simonsen, J. N., Ronald, A., Gakinya, M., Ndinya-Achola, J. O., Brunham, R., et al. (1989) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(89)90589-8 · Cited by 753
Self-citationHistory of Circumcision, Medical Conditions, and Sexual Activity and Risk of Penile Cancer
Maden, C., Sherman, K. J., Beckmann, A. M., Hislop, T. G., Teh, C.-Z., Ashley, R. L., & Daling, J. R. (1993) · JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute · doi:10.1093/jnci/85.1.19 · Cited by 426
Human Immunodeficiency Virus Infection among Men with Sexually Transmitted Diseases
Simonsen, J. N., Cameron, D. W., Gakinya, M. N., Ndinya-Achola, J. O., D'Costa, L. J., Karasira, P., Cheang, M., Ronald, A. R., Piot, P., & Plummer, F. A. (1988) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm198808043190504 · Cited by 397
Self-citationThe prepuce: specialized mucosa of the penis and its loss to circumcision
Taylor, J. R., Lockwood, A. P., & Taylor, A. J. (1996) · British Journal of Urology · doi:10.1046/j.1464-410x.1996.85023.x · Cited by 305
Efficacy and Safety of Lidocaine–Prilocaine Cream for Pain during Circumcision
Taddio, A., Stevens, B., Craig, K., Rastogi, P., Ben-David, S., Shennan, A., Mulligan, P., & Koren, G. (1997) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199704243361701 · Cited by 293
Circumcision in the United States: Prevalence, Prophylactic Effects, and Sexual Practice
Laumann, E. O., Masi, C. M., & Zuckerman, E. W. (1998) · Journal of Urology · doi:10.1016/s0022-5347(01)63847-3 · Cited by 277
Geographical Patterns of Male Circumcision Practices in Africa: Association with HIV Seroprevalence
MOSES, S., BRADLEY, J. E., NAGELKERKE, N. J. D., RONALD, A. R., NDINYA-ACHOLA, J. O., & PLUMMER, F. A. (1990) · International Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/ije/19.3.693 · Cited by 223
Self-citationCircumcision in the United States: Prevalence, Prophylactic Effects, and Sexual Practice
Laumann, E. O. (1997) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.1997.03540370042034 · Cited by 222
COHORT STUDY OF VENEREAL DISEASE. I: THE RISK OF GONORRHEA TRANSMISSION FROM INFECTED WOMEN TO MEN
HOOPER, R. R., REYNOLDS, G. H., JONES, O. G., ZAIDI, A., WIESNER, P. J., LATIMER, K. P., LESTER, A., CAMPBELL, A. F., HARRISON, W. O., KARNEY, W. W., et al. (1978) · American Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a112597 · Cited by 215
Cited by
Buchbinder, S. P., Vittinghoff, E., Heagerty, P. J., Celum, C. L., Seage, G. R., Judson, F. N., McKirnan, D., Mayer, K. H., & Koblin, B. A. (2005) · JAIDS Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes · doi:10.1097/01.qai.0000134740.41585.f4 · Cited by 230
Silverman, E. K. (2004) · Annual Review of Anthropology · doi:10.1146/annurev.anthro.33.070203.143706 · Cited by 105
Lunde, I. B., Hauge, M.-I., Johansen, R. E. B., & Sagbakken, M. (2020) · Ethnicities · doi:10.1177/1468796819896089 · Cited by 14
Metadata
- Authors
- Moses, S., Bailey, R. C., & Ronald, A. R.
- Venue
- Sexually Transmitted Infections
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 1998-10
- Volume
- 74
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 368-373
- ISSN
- 0007-134X (ISSN-L)
- 1368-4973
- 1472-3263
- OpenAlex
- W2035200144
- Cited by
- 317
- References
- 41
- FWCI
- 14.06
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Male circumcision: assessment of health benefits and risks. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/sti.74.5.368
- The paper
- Moses, S., Bailey, R. C., & Ronald, A. R. (1998). Male circumcision: assessment of health benefits and risks. Sexually Transmitted Infections. https://doi.org/10.1136/sti.74.5.368
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.