The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
p55 Tumor Necrosis Factor Receptor Fusion Protein in the Treatment of Patients With Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock: A Randomized Controlled Multicenter Trial
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of p55 tumor necrosis factor receptor fusion protein, a recombinant chimeric protein of human p55 (type I) tumor necrosis factor receptor (CD120a) extracellular domain and IgG1 sequences (referred to as p55-IgG), in the treatment of patients with severe sepsis or septic shock. DESIGN: Randomized, prospective, multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial. SETTING: Forty-four community and university-affiliated hospitals in the United States and Europe. PATIENTS: There were 498 patients enrolled in this clinical trial. INTERVENTION: Patients prospectively stratified within each site into refractory shock or severe sepsis groups were randomized to receive a single infusion of p55-IgG, 0.083 mg/kg, 0.042 mg/kg, or 0.008 mg/kg, or placebo. Patients received standard aggressive medical/surgical care during the 28-day postinfusion period. OUTCOME MEASURE: Twenty-eight-day all-cause mortality. RESULTS: The distribution of variables describing demographics, organ system dysfunction or failure, infecting microorganisms, predicted mortality, plasma interleukin 6 levels, and plasma tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-alpha) levels were similar among patients in the p55-IgG and placebo treatment arms. A planned interim analysis was performed after 201 patients were enrolled. Because a statistically nonsignificant trend toward increased mortality was present in patients who had received 0.008 mg/kg, this treatment arm was discontinued, and the study continued with 3 arms. Among all infused patients, there was a statistically nonsignificant trend toward reduced 28-day all-cause mortality in those who received p55-IgG compared with placebo-treated patients (5% reduction, 0.042 mg/kg vs placebo; 15% reduction, 0.083 mg/kg vs placebo; P=.30). However, in patients with severe sepsis and early septic shock (n=247), therapy with p55-IgG, 0.083 mg/kg, was associated with a 36% reduction in 28-day all-cause mortality compared with placebo (P=.07): 20 (23%) of 87 patients died among those treated with p55-IgG, 0.083 mg/kg; 30 (37%) of 82 among those treated with p55-IgG, 0.042 mg/kg; and 28 (36%) of 78 in the placebo group. A prospectively planned logistic regression analysis to assess treatment effect on 28-day all-cause mortality by means of predicted mortality and serum interleukin 6 levels as continuous covariates demonstrated a significant improvement in outcome for the patients with severe sepsis treated with p55-IgG, 0.083 mg/kg, compared with placebo (P=.01). Serious adverse events, including death and the development of new organ system dysfunction, were reported in 65% of patients infused with placebo, with no increased frequency (56%) present in the 2 p55-IgG treatment arms. There were no reports of immediate hypersensitivity reactions caused by p55-IgG. CONCLUSIONS: In this dose-finding study, there was no decrease in mortality between placebo and p55-IgG in all infused patients. In the prospectively defined population of patients with severe sepsis who received p55-IgG, 0.083 mg/kg, there was a trend toward reduced mortality at day 28 that became significant when predicted mortality and plasma interleukin 6 levels were included in a logistic regression analysis.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Anti-cachectin/TNF monoclonal antibodies prevent septic shock during lethal bacteraemia
Tracey, K. J., Fong, Y., Hesse, D. G., Manogue, K. R., Lee, A. T., Kuo, G. C., Lowry, S. F., & Cerami, A. (1987) · Nature · doi:10.1038/330662a0 · Cited by 2,448
Detection of circulating tumor necrosis factor after endotoxin administration
Michie, H. R., Manogue, K. R., Spriggs, D. R., Revhaug, A., O'Dwyer, S., Dinarello, C. A., Cerami, A., Wolff, S. M., & Wilmore, D. W. (1988) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm198806093182301 · Cited by 1,677
Cited by
Into the Eye of the Cytokine Storm
Tisoncik, J. R., Korth, M. J., Simmons, C. P., Farrar, J., Martin, T. R., & Katze, M. G. (2012) · Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews · doi:10.1128/mmbr.05015-11 · Cited by 1,940
Feedback Inhibition of Macrophage Tumor Necrosis Factor-α Production by Tristetraprolin
Carballo, E., Lai, W. S., & Blackshear, P. J. (1998) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.281.5379.1001 · Cited by 1,161
Cytokine-mediated inflammation in acute lung injury
Goodman, R. B., Pugin, J., Lee, J. S., & Matthay, M. A. (2003) · Cytokine & Growth Factor Reviews · doi:10.1016/s1359-6101(03)00059-5 · Cited by 688
Abraham, E. (1998) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(00)80009-4 · Cited by 624
Self-citationA randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of TAK-242 for the treatment of severe sepsis*
Rice, T. W., Wheeler, A. P., Bernard, G. R., Vincent, J.-L., Angus, D. C., Aikawa, N., Demeyer, I., Sainati, S., Amlot, N., Cao, C., et al. (2010) · Critical Care Medicine · doi:10.1097/ccm.0b013e3181e7c5c9 · Cited by 512
Metadata
- Authors
- Abraham, E.
- Venue
- JAMA
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 1997-05-21
- Volume
- 277
- Issue
- 19
- Pages
- 1531
- ISSN
- 0002-9955 (ISSN-L)
- 0098-7484
- OpenAlex
- W2120599813
- Cited by
- 379
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 28.99
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: p55 Tumor Necrosis Factor Receptor Fusion Protein in the Treatment of Patients With Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock: A Randomized Controlled Multicenter Trial. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/jama.1997.03540430043031
- The paper
- Abraham, E. (1997). p55 Tumor Necrosis Factor Receptor Fusion Protein in the Treatment of Patients With Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock: A Randomized Controlled Multicenter Trial. JAMA. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.1997.03540430043031
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.