The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Effectiveness of a Violence Prevention Curriculum Among Children in Elementary School: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Abstract
Objective. —To determine if a commonly used violence prevention curriculum, Second Step: A Violence Prevention Curriculum, leads to a reduction in aggressive behavior and an increase in prosocial behavior among elementary school students. Design. —Randomized controlled trial. Setting. —Urban and suburban elementary schools in the state of Washington. Participants. —Six matched pairs of schools with 790 second-grade and third-grade students. The students were 53% male and 79% white. Intervention. —The curriculum uses 30 specific lessons to teach social skills related to anger management, impulse control, and empathy. Main Outcome Measures. —Aggressive and prosocial behavior changes were measured 2 weeks and 6 months after participation in the curriculum by parent and teacher reports (Achenbach Child Behavior Checklist and Teacher Report Form, the School Social Behavior Scale, and the Parent-Child Rating Scale) and by observation of a random subsample of 588 students in the classroom and playground/ cafeteria settings. Results. —After adjusting for sex, age, socioeconomic status, race, academic performance, household size, and class size, change scores did not differ significantly between the intervention and control schools for any of the parent-reported or teacher-reported behavior scales. However, the behavior observations did reveal an overall decrease 2 weeks after the curriculum in physical aggression (P=.03) and an increase in neutral/prosocial behavior (P=.04) in the intervention group compared with the control group. Most effects persisted 6 months later. Conclusions. —The Second Step violence prevention curriculum appears to lead to a moderate observed decrease in physically aggressive behavior and an increase in neutral and prosocial behavior in school.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Webster‐Stratton, C., Jamila Reid, M., & Stoolmiller, M. (2008) · Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry · doi:10.1111/j.1469-7610.2007.01861.x · Cited by 837
Sustainability of Teacher Implementation of School-Based Mental Health Programs
Han, S. S., & Weiss, B. (2005) · Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology · doi:10.1007/s10802-005-7646-2 · Cited by 641
Korpershoek, H., Harms, T., de Boer, H., van Kuijk, M., & Doolaard, S. (2016) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/0034654315626799 · Cited by 633
Webster-Stratton, C., & Taylor, T. (2001) · Prevention Science · doi:10.1023/a:1011510923900 · Cited by 585
A systematic review of universal approaches to mental health promotion in schools
Wells, J., Barlow, J., & Stewart-Brown, S. (2003) · Health Education · doi:10.1108/09654280310485546 · Cited by 459
Metadata
- Authors
- Grossman, D. C.
- Venue
- JAMA
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 1997-05-28
- Volume
- 277
- Issue
- 20
- Pages
- 1605
- ISSN
- 0002-9955 (ISSN-L)
- 0098-7484
- OpenAlex
- W4360754450
- Cited by
- 269
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 21.41
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Effectiveness of a Violence Prevention Curriculum Among Children in Elementary School: A Randomized Controlled Trial. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/jama.1997.03540440039030
- The paper
- Grossman, D. C. (1997). Effectiveness of a Violence Prevention Curriculum Among Children in Elementary School: A Randomized Controlled Trial. JAMA. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.1997.03540440039030
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.