Cited by 641School Health and Nursing EducationHealth Policy Implementation ScienceBehavioral and Psychological Studies

Sustainability of Teacher Implementation of School-Based Mental Health Programs

Han, Susan S., Weiss, Bahr·2005·Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology

Abstract

Evidence-based prevention and intervention programs are increasingly being implemented in schools and it therefore is becoming increasingly important to understand the complexities of program implementation under real-world conditions. Much research has focused on the contextual factors that influence program implementation but less work has attempted to provide an integrated understanding of mechanisms (e.g., teacher-training processes) that affect teachers' program implementation. In this paper, we review literature on factors related to teachers' implementation of school-based prevention and intervention programs, then from this review abstract what we believe are four basic ingredients that characterize potentially sustainable teacher-implemented classroom programs. Finally, we present a sequential model, based on these ingredients, of the naturalistic processes underlying sustainability of teachers' program implementation and describe how this sustainability can be enhanced through provision of teacher training and performance feedback from a classroom consultant.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10802-005-7646-2

Cites

98 of 98 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The yearly teacher survey assesses factors at the individual level that fidelity research often neglects, such as enthusiasm, stress, and prior experience.

    “Finally, our annual teacher survey measures other individual-level factors often overlooked in implementation fidelity research, including teacher characteristics, such as enthusiasm, level of stress, and prior experience (e.g., Domitrovich et al. 2008; Dusenbury et al. 2005; Han and Weiss 2005; Greenberg et al. 2005).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Han, S. S., & Weiss, B.
Affiliations
Vanderbilt University (US)
Corresponding author
Han, Susan S.
Venue
Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology
Published
2005-12
Volume
33
Issue
6
Pages
665-679
ISSN
  • 0091-0627 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-2835
OpenAlex
W1977960011
Cited by
641
References
92
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 24 · 2023: 30 · 2022: 36 · 2021: 46 · 2020: 39 · 2019: 43 · 2018: 45 · 2017: 45 · 2016: 36 · 2015: 51 · 2014: 35 · 2013: 49 · 2012: 36
FWCI
3.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Research on Child and Adolescent Psychopathology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Vanderbilt University
  • National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH058275, R01-MH-58275)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Speech and Hearing › School Health and Nursing Education
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Behavioral and Psychological Studies
Keywords
school-based mental health programs, program implementation, sustainability, teacher professional development, performance feedback, prevention programs, intervention program, implementation mechanisms, contextual factors
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Child, Faculty, Health Education, Health Plan Implementation, Humans, Mental Health Services, School Health Services, United States, Program Evaluation, Models, Organizational

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review