The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Calibrating the Physician: Personal Awareness and Effective Patient Care
Abstract
Physicians' personal characteristics, their past experiences, values, attitudes, and biases can have important effects on communication with patients; being aware of these characteristics can enhance communication. Because medical training and continuing education programs rarely undertake an organized approach to promoting personal awareness, we propose a "curriculum" of 4 core topics for reflection and discussion. The topics are physicians' beliefs and attitudes, physicians' feelings and emotional responses in patient care, challenging clinical situations, and physician self-care. We present examples of organized activities that can promote physician personal awareness such as support groups, Balint groups, and discussions of meaningful experiences in medicine. Experience with these activities suggests that through enhancing personal awareness physicians can improve their clinical care and increase satisfaction with work, relationships, and themselves.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Psychological well-being: Meaning, measurement, and implications for psychotherapy research
Ryff, C. D., & Singer, B. (2010) · Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics · doi:10.1159/000289026 · Cited by 1,295
Do House Officers Learn From Their Mistakes?
Wu, A. W. (1991) · JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association · doi:10.1001/jama.1991.03460160067031 · Cited by 565
Sex Differences in Patients?? and Physicians?? Communication During Primary Care Medical Visits
Drph, D. R., Lipkin, M., & Korsgaard, A. (1991) · Medical Care · doi:10.1097/00005650-199111000-00002 · Cited by 414
Cited by
Executive Leadership and Physician Well-being
Shanafelt, T. D., & Noseworthy, J. H. (2017) · Mayo Clinic Proceedings · doi:10.1016/j.mayocp.2016.10.004 · Cited by 1,776
Empathy Decline and Its Reasons: A Systematic Review of Studies With Medical Students and Residents
Neumann, M., Edelhäuser, F., Tauschel, D., Fischer, M. R., Wirtz, M., Woopen, C., Haramati, A., & Scheffer, C. (2011) · Academic Medicine · doi:10.1097/acm.0b013e318221e615 · Cited by 1,637
The biopsychosocial model 25 years later: principles, practice, and scientific inquiry
Borrell-Carrio, F. (2004) · The Annals of Family Medicine · doi:10.1370/afm.245 · Cited by 1,546
West, C. P., Huschka, M. M., Novotny, P. J., Sloan, J. A., Kolars, J. C., Habermann, T. M., & Shanafelt, T. D. (2006) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.296.9.1071 · Cited by 1,454
Essential Elements of Communication in Medical Encounters: The Kalamazoo Consensus Statement
Makoul, G. (2001) · Academic Medicine · doi:10.1097/00001888-200104000-00021 · Cited by 917
Metadata
- Authors
- Novack, D. H.
- Venue
- JAMA
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 1997-08-13
- Volume
- 278
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 502
- ISSN
- 0002-9955 (ISSN-L)
- 0098-7484
- OpenAlex
- W2025198380
- Cited by
- 448
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 11.97
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Calibrating the Physician: Personal Awareness and Effective Patient Care. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/jama.1997.03550060078040
- The paper
- Novack, D. H. (1997). Calibrating the Physician: Personal Awareness and Effective Patient Care. JAMA. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.1997.03550060078040
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.