The DOI matches its OpenAlex record.
Risk of end-stage renal disease in diabetes mellitus: a prospective cohort study of men screened for MRFIT. Multiple Risk Factor Intervention Trial
Abstract
CONTEXT: Diabetes is a frequent cause of end-stage renal disease (ESRD). However, the degree of risk is uncertain. OBJECTIVE: To determine the relative risk (RR) of ESRD related to diabetes in the United States. DESIGN: Nonconcurrent prospective cohort study. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 332544 men aged 35 to 57 years from 18 US cities screened in 1973 to 1975 for participation in the Multiple Risk Factor Intervention Trial (MRFIT). MAIN EXPOSURE: Diabetes mellitus defined by self-reported use of medication for diabetes at baseline. MAIN OUTCOME: Incident ESRD through 1990 assessed from a national ESRD registry and by surveillance for death from renal disease. RESULTS: Over an average follow-up of 16 years, there were 136 cases of ESRD in 5147 diabetic men and 678 cases in 327397 nondiabetic men. Age-adjusted incidence of all-cause ESRD in the diabetic men was 199.8 per 100000 person-years compared with 13.7 per 100000 person years in their nondiabetic counterparts (RR, 12.7; 95% confidence interval [CI], 10.5-15.4). Diabetic men were also at higher risk for ESRD ascribed to causes other than diabetes (RR=4.3; 95% CI, 3.2-5.9). With simultaneous adjustment for age, ethnicity, income, blood pressure, serum cholesterol level, and history of myocardial infarction, diabetic men remained at higher risk for all-cause ESRD (RR, 9.0; 95% CI, 7.4-11.0), ESRD ascribed to diabetes (RR, 92.3; 95% CI, 64.6-131.9), and ESRD ascribed to nondiabetic causes (RR, 3.0; 95% CI, 2.2-4.1). CONCLUSIONS: Diabetes mellitus is a strong independent risk factor for ESRD, even for ESRD ascribed to causes other than diabetes. Improvements in the prevention and control of diabetes should produce substantial reductions in ESRD incidence.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Prevalence of Diabetes among Men and Women in China
Yang, W., Lu, J., Weng, J., Jia, W., Ji, L., Xiao, J., Shan, Z., Liu, J., Tian, H., Ji, Q., et al. (2010) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa0908292 · Cited by 3,031
Authors/Task Force Members, Ryden, L., Standl, E., Bartnik, M., Van den Berghe, G., Betteridge, J., de Boer, M.-J., Cosentino, F., Jonsson, B., Laakso, M., et al. (2006) · European Heart Journal · doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehl260 · Cited by 1,647
Predictors of New-Onset Kidney Disease in a Community-Based Population
Fox, C. S. (2004) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.291.7.844 · Cited by 1,241
Age Affects Outcomes in Chronic Kidney Disease
O'Hare, A. M., Choi, A. I., Bertenthal, D., Bacchetti, P., Garg, A. X., Kaufman, J. S., Walter, L. C., Mehta, K. M., Steinman, M. A., Allon, M., et al. (2007) · Journal of the American Society of Nephrology · doi:10.1681/asn.2007040422 · Cited by 747
Metabolic Syndrome and the Risk for Chronic Kidney Disease among Nondiabetic Adults
Kurella, M., Lo, J. C., & Chertow, G. M. (2005) · Journal of the American Society of Nephrology · doi:10.1681/asn.2005010106 · Cited by 709
Metadata
- Authors
- Brancati, F. L.
- Venue
- JAMA
- Publisher
- American Medical Association
- Published
- 1997-12-17
- Volume
- 278
- Issue
- 23
- Pages
- 2069-2074
- ISSN
- 0002-9955 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4247026096
- Cited by
- 272
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 2.04
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Risk of end-stage renal disease in diabetes mellitus: a prospective cohort study of men screened for MRFIT. Multiple Risk Factor Intervention Trial. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/jama.278.23.2069
- The paper
- Brancati, F. L. (1997). Risk of end-stage renal disease in diabetes mellitus: a prospective cohort study of men screened for MRFIT. Multiple Risk Factor Intervention Trial. JAMA. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.278.23.2069
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.