Cited by 1,241Chronic Kidney Disease and DiabetesAcute Kidney Injury ResearchBlood Pressure and Hypertension Studies

Predictors of New-Onset Kidney Disease in a Community-Based Population

Fox, Caroline S.·2004·JAMA

Abstract

Context Kidney disease is associated with an increased risk for the development of cardiovascular disease and end-stage renal disease; however, risk factors for kidney disease have not been well studied. Objective To identify predictors of the development of new-onset kidney disease. Design, setting, and participants A community-based, longitudinal cohort study of 2585 participants who attended both a baseline examination in 1978-1982 and a follow-up examination in 1998-2001, and who were free of kidney disease at baseline. Main outcome measures Kidney disease was assessed by the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease Study equation and defined by a glomerular filtration rate (GFR) in the fifth or lower percentile ( Results At baseline, there were 1223 men and 1362 women, with a mean age of 43 years, who were free of preexisting kidney disease. After a mean follow-up of 18.5 years, 244 participants (9.4%) had developed kidney disease. In multivariable models, baseline age (odds ratio [OR], 2.36 per 10-year increment; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.00-2.78), GFR ( or =120 mL/min per 1.73 m2), a mildly reduced GFR ( Conclusions Established cardiovascular disease risk factors are associated with the development of new-onset kidney disease. Patients with a mildly reduced GFR should be monitored for progression to kidney disease.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/jama.291.7.844

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Dyslipidemia is a risk factor for progressive kidney disease.

    “While dyslipidemia is a risk factor for progressive kidney disease (8,10,20,21)”

    From Effects of Fibrates in Kidney Disease (2012) · cites this paper as [8]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fox, C. S.
Affiliations
Framingham Heart Study (US)
Corresponding author
Fox, Caroline S.
Venue
JAMA
Published
2004-02-18
Volume
291
Issue
7
Pages
844
ISSN
  • 0002-9955 (ISSN-L)
  • 0098-7484
OpenAlex
W1992283514
Cited by
1,241
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 21 · 2025: 28 · 2024: 50 · 2023: 37 · 2022: 53 · 2021: 62 · 2020: 62 · 2019: 47 · 2018: 49 · 2017: 59 · 2016: 81 · 2015: 49 · 2014: 79 · 2013: 83 · 2012: 68
FWCI
28.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • JAMA (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (n01hc25195-41-0-1)
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (N01‐HC25195)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Nephrology › Chronic Kidney Disease and Diabetes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Nephrology › Acute Kidney Injury Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
Keywords
chronic kidney disease, risk factors, glomerular filtration rate, diabetes mellitus, smoking, body mass index, age, MDRD equation, cardiovascular disease, end-stage renal disease, community-based cohort, risk prediction model, renal function decline, hyperlipidemia, antihypertensive drugs, antihypertensive medication adherence
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Cardiovascular Diseases, Female, Glomerular Filtration Rate, Humans, Kidney Diseases, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Middle Aged, Risk Factors, Logistic Models

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review