Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 309

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Attitudes, Training Experiences, and Professional Expectations of US General Surgery Residents: A National Survey

Yeo, Heather, Viola, Kate, Berg, David, Lin, Zhenqiu, Nunez-Smith, Marcella, Cammann, Cortland, Bell, Richard H., Sosa, Julie Ann, Krumholz, Harlan M., Curry, Leslie A.·2009·JAMA

Abstract

CONTEXT: General surgery residency programs are facing multiple pressures, including attracting and retaining residents. Despite the importance of resident perspectives in designing effective responses to these pressures, understanding of residents' views is limited. OBJECTIVE: To profile US general surgery residents; characterize resident attitudes, experiences, and expectations regarding training; and examine differences by sex and training year. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Cross-sectional study of all general surgery residents completing a survey in January 2008 following administration of the American Board of Surgery In-Training Examination. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Resident satisfaction; perceived supports, strains and concern; career motivations; and professional expectations. RESULTS: Of 5345 categorical general surgery residents, 4402 (82.4%) responded, representing 248 of 249 surgical residency programs. Most respondents expressed satisfaction with training (3686 [85.2%]; 95% confidence interval [CI], 84.1%-86.3%) and supportive peer relationships (3433 [84.2%]; 95% CI, 83.1%-85.3%). However, residents also reported unmet needs and apprehensions about training and careers. Worry that they will not feel confident performing procedures independently was reported by 1185 (27.5%; 95% CI, 26.2%-28.8%), while 2681 (63.8%; 95% CI, 62.4%-65.3%) reported that they must complete specialty training to be competitive. Perceptions of program support differ, with men more likely than women to report that their program provides support (2188 [74.5%] vs 895 [65.6%]; P < .001), and that they can turn to faculty when having difficulties (2193 [74.5%] vs 901 [66.4%]; P < .001). Reports of having considered leaving training in the prior year differed significantly across years (P < .001), highest in postgraduate year 2 (19.2%) and lowest in postgraduate year 5 (7.2%). CONCLUSIONS: General surgery residents' attitudes, experiences, and expectations regarding training reflect both high levels of satisfaction and sources of strain. These factors vary by sex and training year.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/jama.2009.1386

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Cited by

See all 309

Metadata

Authors
Yeo, H., Viola, K., Berg, D., Lin, Z., Nunez-Smith, M., Cammann, C., Bell, R. H., Sosa, J. A., Krumholz, H. M., & Curry, L. A.
Venue
JAMA
Published
2009-09-23
Volume
302
Issue
12
Pages
1301
ISSN
  • 0002-9955 (ISSN-L)
  • 0098-7484
OpenAlex
W1990281511
Cited by
309
References
4
FWCI
50.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Attitudes, Training Experiences, and Professional Expectations of US General Surgery Residents: A National Survey. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/jama.2009.1386
The paper
Yeo, H., Viola, K., Berg, D., Lin, Z., Nunez-Smith, M., Cammann, C., Bell, R. H., Sosa, J. A., Krumholz, H. M., & Curry, L. A. (2009). Attitudes, Training Experiences, and Professional Expectations of US General Surgery Residents: A National Survey. JAMA. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2009.1386

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.