The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Attitudes, Training Experiences, and Professional Expectations of US General Surgery Residents: A National Survey
Abstract
CONTEXT: General surgery residency programs are facing multiple pressures, including attracting and retaining residents. Despite the importance of resident perspectives in designing effective responses to these pressures, understanding of residents' views is limited. OBJECTIVE: To profile US general surgery residents; characterize resident attitudes, experiences, and expectations regarding training; and examine differences by sex and training year. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Cross-sectional study of all general surgery residents completing a survey in January 2008 following administration of the American Board of Surgery In-Training Examination. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Resident satisfaction; perceived supports, strains and concern; career motivations; and professional expectations. RESULTS: Of 5345 categorical general surgery residents, 4402 (82.4%) responded, representing 248 of 249 surgical residency programs. Most respondents expressed satisfaction with training (3686 [85.2%]; 95% confidence interval [CI], 84.1%-86.3%) and supportive peer relationships (3433 [84.2%]; 95% CI, 83.1%-85.3%). However, residents also reported unmet needs and apprehensions about training and careers. Worry that they will not feel confident performing procedures independently was reported by 1185 (27.5%; 95% CI, 26.2%-28.8%), while 2681 (63.8%; 95% CI, 62.4%-65.3%) reported that they must complete specialty training to be competitive. Perceptions of program support differ, with men more likely than women to report that their program provides support (2188 [74.5%] vs 895 [65.6%]; P < .001), and that they can turn to faculty when having difficulties (2193 [74.5%] vs 901 [66.4%]; P < .001). Reports of having considered leaving training in the prior year differed significantly across years (P < .001), highest in postgraduate year 2 (19.2%) and lowest in postgraduate year 5 (7.2%). CONCLUSIONS: General surgery residents' attitudes, experiences, and expectations regarding training reflect both high levels of satisfaction and sources of strain. These factors vary by sex and training year.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Discovery of Grounded Theory; Strategies for Qualitative Research
Glaser, B. G., Strauss, A. L., & Strutzel, E. (1968) · Nursing Research · doi:10.1097/00006199-196807000-00014 · Cited by 39,449
Qualitative research in health care: Analysing qualitative data
Pope, C. (2000) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.320.7227.114 · Cited by 8,131
Qualitative Data Analysis for Health Services Research: Developing Taxonomy, Themes, and Theory
Bradley, E. H., Curry, L. A., & Devers, K. J. (2007) · Health Services Research · doi:10.1111/j.1475-6773.2006.00684.x · Cited by 3,437
Self-citationWhy do residents leave general surgery? The hidden problem in today's programs
Dodson, T. F., & Webb, A. L. B. (2005) · Current Surgery · doi:10.1016/j.cursur.2004.07.009 · Cited by 137 · cited 2×
“These pressures include diminished attraction to surgery as a profession,(4) increasing interest in surgical subspeciali za t ion wi th 70% of res idents completing fellowships in 2004,(5,6) and estimated attrition rates of 17% to 26% among categorical general surgery residents (residents who have guaranteed positions…”
Background
Cited by
Prevalence and Causes of Attrition Among Surgical Residents: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
Khoushhal, Z., Hussain, M. A., Greco, E., Mamdani, M., Verma, S., Rotstein, O., Tricco, A. C., & Al-Omran, M. (2017) · JAMA Surgery · doi:10.1001/jamasurg.2016.4086 · Cited by 281
Our Trainees’ Confidence: Results From a National Survey of 4136 US General Surgery Residents
Bucholz, E. M. (2011) · Archives of Surgery · doi:10.1001/archsurg.2011.178 · Cited by 244
(2010) · doi:10.1097/sla.0b013e3181f2789c · Cited by 191
Dahlke, A. R., Johnson, J. K., Greenberg, C. C., Love, R., Kreutzer, L., Hewitt, D. B., Quinn, C. M., Engelhardt, K. E., & Bilimoria, K. Y. (2018) · Annals of Surgery · doi:10.1097/sla.0000000000002700 · Cited by 137
Sullivan, M. C., Yeo, H., Roman, S. A., Ciarleglio, M. M., Cong, X., Bell, R. H., & Sosa, J. A. (2013) · Journal of the American College of Surgeons · doi:10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2012.11.005 · Cited by 103
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Yeo, H., Viola, K., Berg, D., Lin, Z., Nunez-Smith, M., Cammann, C., Bell, R. H., Sosa, J. A., Krumholz, H. M., & Curry, L. A.
- Venue
- JAMA
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 2009-09-23
- Volume
- 302
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 1301
- ISSN
- 0002-9955 (ISSN-L)
- 0098-7484
- OpenAlex
- W1990281511
- Cited by
- 309
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 50.13
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Attitudes, Training Experiences, and Professional Expectations of US General Surgery Residents: A National Survey. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/jama.2009.1386
- The paper
- Yeo, H., Viola, K., Berg, D., Lin, Z., Nunez-Smith, M., Cammann, C., Bell, R. H., Sosa, J. A., Krumholz, H. M., & Curry, L. A. (2009). Attitudes, Training Experiences, and Professional Expectations of US General Surgery Residents: A National Survey. JAMA. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2009.1386
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.