Cited by 245Innovations in Medical EducationSurgical Simulation and TrainingDiversity and Career in Medicine

Our Trainees’ Confidence: Results From a National Survey of 4136 US General Surgery Residents

Bucholz, Emily M.·2011·Archives of Surgery

Abstract

Objectives To characterize factors shaping surgery resident confidence and determine whether confidence is associated with future specialty training. Design Cross-sectional study. Setting Survey administered at the 2008 American Board of Surgery In-Service Training Examination. Participants All categorical general surgery residents. Interventions National Study of Expectations and Attitudes of Residents in Surgery survey. Participants reported demographics and level of agreement for 46 items regarding confidence, training, and professional plans. Main outcomes measures Survey items "My operating skill level is appropriate" and "I may not feel confident enough to perform procedures independently before training completion." We compared demographics and responses among residents who did/not feel confident. Results Response rate was 77.4%. Residents who were female, single, or without children and at a lower postgraduate year had less confidence in their operating skill, as did residents at larger, university-based programs, in the northeastern United States. Residents worried about competence were more likely to believe specialty training was needed (71.2% vs 60.2%; P Conclusions Sex, marital status, children, and postgraduate year are predictors of confidence, as are program location, type, and size. Residency programs may target modifiable factors contributing to low surgical confidence.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/archsurg.2011.178

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Progression of surgery residency training depends on the development of confidence.

    “Progression of surgery residency training depends on the development of confidence [18].”

    From How Can We Reduce Attrition in General Surgery Residents? (2018) · cites this paper as [18]

  • Women must make more sacrifices during residences such as marriage and childbearing.

    “Women must make more sacrifices during residences such as marriage and childbearing [18].”

    From How Can We Reduce Attrition in General Surgery Residents? (2018) · cites this paper as [18]

  • Residents are concerned about their performance.

    “Residents are concerned about their performance [18].”

    From How Can We Reduce Attrition in General Surgery Residents? (2018) · cites this paper as [18]

  • The most common benefit for female surgery residents and practicing general surgeons is formal maternity leave.

    “The most common benefit for female surgery residents and practicing general surgeons is formal maternity leave [18].”

    From How Can We Reduce Attrition in General Surgery Residents? (2018) · cites this paper as [18]

  • Senior medical students in surgery improve their confidence during residency.

    “Senior medical students in surgery improve their confidence during residency [12,18].”

    From How Can We Reduce Attrition in General Surgery Residents? (2018) · cites this paper as [18]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bucholz, E. M.
Affiliations
Yale University (US)
Corresponding author
Bucholz, Emily M.
Venue
Archives of Surgery
Published
2011-08-01
Volume
146
Issue
8
Pages
907
ISSN
0004-0010 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1985393754
Cited by
244
References
20
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 31 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 37 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 20 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 7
FWCI
10.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Archives of Surgery (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Yale University
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Innovations in Medical Education
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Surgical Simulation and Training
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Diversity and Career in Medicine
Keywords
operating skills, surgical proficiency, gender differences, marital status, postgraduate year, residency program size, program location, fellowship training, help-seeking, resident satisfaction
MeSH terms
Adult, Attitude of Health Personnel, Career Choice, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Humans, Internship and Residency, Male, Self Concept, Specialties, Surgical, General Surgery

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review