The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Why medical educators may be failing at feedback.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Current best practice approaches position learners as passive receivers of feedback 2325 and have been criticiz ed as 'too teacher centred.' 26”
From Medical student perceptions of feedback and feedback behaviors within the context of the “educational alliance.” (2017) · cites this paper as [25]
Citations
Cites
Davis, D. A., Mazmanian, P. E., Fordis, M., Van Harrison, R., Thorpe, K. E., & Perrier, L. (2006) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.296.9.1094 · Cited by 2,375
Feedback in Clinical Medical Education
Ende, J. (1983) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.1983.03340060055026 · Cited by 1,259
SMITHER, J. W., LONDON, M., & REILLY, R. R. (2005) · Personnel Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.2005.514_1.x · Cited by 601
Branch, W. T., & Paranjape, A. (2002) · Academic Medicine · doi:10.1097/00001888-200212000-00005 · Cited by 506
360° feedback: Accuracy, reactions, and perceptions of usefulness.
Brett, J. F., & ATWATER, L. E. (2001) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.86.5.930 · Cited by 503
Comparing Millennial and Generation X Medical Students at One Medical School
Borges, N. J., Manuel, R. S., Elam, C. L., & Jones, B. J. (2006) · Academic Medicine · doi:10.1097/01.acm.0000225222.38078.47 · Cited by 192
De, S. K., Henke, P. K., Ailawadi, G., Dimick, J. B., & Colletti, L. M. (2004) · Journal of the American College of Surgeons · doi:10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2004.08.025 · Cited by 157
Bahar-Özvarış, Ş., Aslan, D., Sahin‐Hodoglugil, N., & Sayek, İ. (2004) · Teaching and Learning in Medicine · doi:10.1207/s15328015tlm1604_11 · Cited by 33
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The role of assessment in competency-based medical education
Holmboe, E. S., Sherbino, J., Long, D. M., Swing, S. R., Frank, J. R., & Collaborators, F. T. I. C. (2010) · Medical Teacher · doi:10.3109/0142159x.2010.500704 · Cited by 956
The “educational alliance” as a framework for reconceptualizing feedback in medical education.
Telio, S., Ajjawi, R., & Regehr, G. (2015) · Academic Medicine · doi:10.1097/acm.0000000000000560 · Cited by 572
Twelve tips for giving feedback effectively in the clinical environment
Ramani, S., & Krackov, S. K. (2012) · Medical Teacher · doi:10.3109/0142159x.2012.684916 · Cited by 438
Wald, H. S., Borkan, J. M., Taylor, J. S., Anthony, D., & Reis, S. P. (2012) · Academic Medicine · doi:10.1097/acm.0b013e31823b55fa · Cited by 391
Researching feedback dialogue: an interactional analysis approach
Ajjawi, R., & Boud, D. J. (2015) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2015.1102863 · Cited by 364
Metadata
- Authors
- Bing-You, R. G.
- Venue
- JAMA
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 2009-09-23
- Volume
- 302
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 1330
- ISSN
- 0002-9955 (ISSN-L)
- 0098-7484
- OpenAlex
- W1987628633
- Cited by
- 224
- References
- 8
- Citations by year
- 2026: 10 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 23 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 10
- FWCI
- 9.40
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- JAMA (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Innovations in Medical Education
- Social Sciences › Education › Student Assessment and Feedback
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Family Practice › Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills
- Keywords
- feedback, medical education, medical faculty, learner performance
- MeSH terms
- Adaptation, Psychological, Clinical Competence, Education, Medical, Emotions, Faculty, Medical, Feedback, Humans, Knowledge of Results, Psychological, Self-Assessment, Self Concept, Students, Medical, Teaching
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
