The DOI matches its Crossref record; 23 of the 23 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Outcomes Following Endovascular vs Open Repair of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm<subtitle>A Randomized Trial</subtitle>
Abstract
CONTEXT: Limited data are available to assess whether endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) improves short-term outcomes compared with traditional open repair. OBJECTIVE: To compare postoperative outcomes up to 2 years after endovascular or open repair of AAA in a planned interim report of a 9-year trial. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PATIENTS: A randomized, multicenter clinical trial of 881 veterans (aged > or = 49 years) from 42 Veterans Affairs Medical Centers with eligible AAA who were candidates for both elective endovascular repair and open repair of AAA. The trial is ongoing and this report describes the period between October 15, 2002, and October 15, 2008. INTERVENTION: Elective endovascular (n = 444) or open (n = 437) repair of AAA. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Procedure failure, secondary therapeutic procedures, length of stay, quality of life, erectile dysfunction, major morbidity, and mortality. RESULTS: Mean follow-up was 1.8 years. Perioperative mortality (30 days or inpatient) was lower for endovascular repair (0.5% vs 3.0%; P = .004), but there was no significant difference in mortality at 2 years (7.0% vs 9.8%, P = .13). Patients in the endovascular repair group had reduced median procedure time (2.9 vs 3.7 hours), blood loss (200 vs 1000 mL), transfusion requirement (0 vs 1.0 units), duration of mechanical ventilation (3.6 vs 5.0 hours), hospital stay (3 vs 7 days), and intensive care unit stay (1 vs 4 days), but required substantial exposure to fluoroscopy and contrast. There were no differences between the 2 groups in major morbidity, procedure failure, secondary therapeutic procedures, aneurysm-related hospitalizations, health-related quality of life, or erectile function. CONCLUSIONS: In this report of short-term outcomes after elective AAA repair, perioperative mortality was low for both procedures and lower for endovascular than open repair. The early advantage of endovascular repair was not offset by increased morbidity or mortality in the first 2 years after repair. Longer-term outcome data are needed to fully assess the relative merits of the 2 procedures. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00094575.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Statistical Analysis of Failure Time Data.
Aitkin, M., Kalbfleisch, J. D., & Prentice, R. L. (1981) · Biometrics · doi:10.2307/2530581 · Cited by 9,877
Levey, A. S., Coresh, J., Greene, T., Stevens, L. A., Zhang, Y. (., Hendriksen, S., Kusek, J. W., & Van Lente, F. (2006) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-145-4-200608150-00004 · Cited by 5,725
Rosen, R., Cappelleri, J., Smith, M., Lipsky, J., & Peña, B. (1999) · International Journal of Impotence Research · doi:10.1038/sj.ijir.3900472 · Cited by 3,053
The Statistical Analysis of Failure Time Data
Klein, J. P. (1982) · Technometrics · doi:10.1080/00401706.1982.10487769 · Cited by 2,215
A Randomized Trial Comparing Conventional and Endovascular Repair of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms
Prinssen, M., Verhoeven, E. L. G., Buth, J., Cuypers, P. W. M., van Sambeek, M. R. H. M., Balm, R., Buskens, E., Grobbee, D. E., & Blankensteijn, J. D. (2004) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa042002 · Cited by 2,020
Greenhalgh, R. (2004) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(04)16979-1 · Cited by 2,011
US Valuation of the EQ-5D Health States: Development and Testing of the D1 Valuation Model
Shaw, J. W., Johnson, J. A., & Coons, S. J. (2005) · Medical Care · doi:10.1097/00005650-200503000-00003 · Cited by 1,274
Immediate Repair Compared with Surveillance of Small Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms
Lederle, F. A., Wilson, S. E., Johnson, G. R., Reinke, D. B., Littooy, F. N., Acher, C. W., Ballard, D. J., Messina, L. M., Gordon, I. L., Chute, E. P., et al. (2002) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa012573 · Cited by 1,089
Self-citation
Cited by
Erbel (2014) · doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehu281 · Cited by 4,451
Chaikof, E. L., Dalman, R. L., Eskandari, M. K., Jackson, B. M., Lee, W. A., Mansour, M. A., Mastracci, T. M., Mell, M., Murad, M. H., Nguyen, L. L., et al. (2018) · Journal of Vascular Surgery · doi:10.1016/j.jvs.2017.10.044 · Cited by 2,751
Wanhainen, A., Verzini, F., Van Herzeele, I., Allaire, E., Bown, M., Cohnert, T., Dick, F., van Herwaarden, J., Karkos, C., Koelemay, M., et al. (2019) · European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery · doi:10.1016/j.ejvs.2018.09.020 · Cited by 2,326
Isselbacher, E. M., Preventza, O., Hamilton Black, J., Augoustides, J. G., Beck, A. W., Bolen, M. A., Braverman, A. C., Bray, B. E., Brown-Zimmerman, M. M., Chen, E. P., et al. (2022) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/cir.0000000000001106 · Cited by 2,082
Wanhainen, A., Van Herzeele, I., Bastos Goncalves, F., Bellmunt Montoya, S., Berard, X., Boyle, J. R., D’Oria, M., Prendes, C. F., Karkos, C. D., Kazimierczak, A., et al. (2024) · European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery · doi:10.1016/j.ejvs.2023.11.002 · Cited by 1,207
Metadata
- Authors
- Lederle, F. A.
- Venue
- JAMA
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 2009-10-14
- Volume
- 302
- Issue
- 14
- Pages
- 1535
- ISSN
- 0002-9955 (ISSN-L)
- 0098-7484
- OpenAlex
- W2132380731
- Cited by
- 1,077
- References
- 23
- FWCI
- 51.58
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Outcomes Following Endovascular vs Open Repair of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm<subtitle>A Randomized Trial</subtitle>. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/jama.2009.1426
- The paper
- Lederle, F. A. (2009). Outcomes Following Endovascular vs Open Repair of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm<subtitle>A Randomized Trial</subtitle>. JAMA. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2009.1426
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.