Cited by 2,082Aortic Disease and Treatment ApproachesConnective tissue disorders researchAortic aneurysm repair treatments

2022 ACC/AHA guideline for the diagnosis and management of aortic disease: a report of the American heart association/American college of cardiology joint committee on clinical practice guidelines

Open access
Isselbacher, Eric M., Preventza, Ourania, Hamilton Black, James, Augoustides, John G., Beck, Adam W., Bolen, Michael A., Braverman, Alan C., Bray, Bruce E. +39 more·2022·Circulation

Abstract

AIM: The "2022 ACC/AHA Guideline for the Diagnosis and Management of Aortic Disease" provides recommendations to guide clinicians in the diagnosis, genetic evaluation and family screening, medical therapy, endovascular and surgical treatment, and long-term surveillance of patients with aortic disease across its multiple clinical presentation subsets (ie, asymptomatic, stable symptomatic, and acute aortic syndromes). METHODS: A comprehensive literature search was conducted from January 2021 to April 2021, encompassing studies, reviews, and other evidence conducted on human subjects that were published in English from PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, CINHL Complete, and other selected databases relevant to this guideline. Additional relevant studies, published through June 2022 during the guideline writing process, were also considered by the writing committee, where appropriate. Structure: Recommendations from previously published AHA/ACC guidelines on thoracic aortic disease, peripheral artery disease, and bicuspid aortic valve disease have been updated with new evidence to guide clinicians. In addition, new recommendations addressing comprehensive care for patients with aortic disease have been developed. There is added emphasis on the role of shared decision making, especially in the management of patients with aortic disease both before and during pregnancy. The is also an increased emphasis on the importance of institutional interventional volume and multidisciplinary aortic team expertise in the care of patients with aortic disease.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/cir.0000000000001106

Cites

1104 of 1104 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Beta-blockers, angiotensin receptor blockers, or both have been shown to prevent aortic dilation and aortic dissections in individuals with other aortopathy conditions.

    “Medical therapy of hypertension for individuals with TS and aortic dilation should preferably include a beta-blocker, angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB), or both, which have been shown to prevent aortic dilation and aortic dissections in individuals with other aortopathy conditions.439”
  • Applying the current absolute diameter thresholds for aortic dilation (>4.0 cm) or aneurysm (>4.5 cm) to adults with TS would almost certainly lead to delayed recognition of aortic disease.

    “In this context, applying the current absolute diameter thresholds for aortic dilation (>4.0 cm) or aneurysm (>4.5 cm) to adults with TS would almost certainly lead to delayed recognition of aortic disease.439”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

1 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 368

  1. [5]Halperin JL, Levine GN, Al-Khatib SM, Further evolution of the ACC/AHA clinical practice guideline recommendation classification system: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Circulation. 2014; 129: 2329– 2345.24677315
  2. [4]Czerny M, Schmidli J, Adler S, Current options and recommendations for the treatment of thoracic aortic pathologies involving the aortic arch: an expert consensus document of the European Association for CardioThoracic surgery (EACTS) and the European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS). Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2019; 55: 133– 162. 30312382
  3. [2]Riambau V, Bockler D, Brunkwall J, Editor’s choice - management of descending thoracic aorta diseases: clinical practice guidelines of the European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS). Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2017; 53: 4– 52. 28081802
  4. [9]Masri A, Kalahasti V, Svensson LG, Aortic cross-sectional area/height ratio and outcomes in patients with a trileaflet aortic valve and a dilated aorta. Circulation. 2016; 134: 1724– 1737. 27770001
  5. [10]Masri A, Kalahasti V, Svensson LG, Aortic cross-sectional area/height ratio and outcomes in patients with bicuspid aortic valve and a dilated ascending aorta. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2017; 10: e006249. 28592593
  6. [11]Zafar MA, Li Y, Rizzo JA, Height alone, rather than body surface area, suffices for risk estimation in ascending aortic aneurysm. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2018; 155: 1938– 1950. 29395211
  7. [1]Lombardi JV, Hughes GC, Appoo JJ, Society for Vascular Surgery (SVS) and Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) reporting standards for type B aortic dissections. J Vasc Surg. 2020; 71: 723– 747. 32001058
  8. [2]Vasan RS, Larson MG, Levy D. Determinants of echocardiographic aortic root size. The Framingham Heart Study. Circulation. 1995; 91: 734– 740. 7828301
  9. [3]Vasan RS, Larson MG, Benjamin EJ, Echocardiographic reference values for aortic root size: the Framingham Heart Study. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 1995; 8: 793– 800. 8611279
  10. [4]Devereux RB, de Simone G, Arnett DK, Normal limits in relation to age, body size and gender of two-dimensional echocardiographic aortic root dimensions in persons ≥15 years of age. Am J Cardiol. 2012; 110: 1189– 1194. 22770936 PMC3462295
  11. [5]Vriz O, Driussi C, Bettio M, Aortic root dimensions and stiffness in healthy subjects. Am J Cardiol. 2013; 112: 1224– 1229. 23871268
  12. [6]Rodriguez-Palomares JF, Teixido-Tura G, Galuppo V, Multimodality Assessment of Ascending Aortic Diameters: Comparison of Different Measurement Methods. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2016; 29: 819– 826.e814. 27288090
  13. [10]Masri A, Kalahasti V, Svensson LG, Aortic cross-sectional area/height ratio and outcomes in patients with a trileaflet aortic valve and a dilated aorta. Circulation. 2016; 134: 1724– 1737. 27770001
  14. [11]Masri A, Kalahasti V, Svensson LG, Aortic cross-sectional area/height ratio and outcomes in patients with bicuspid aortic valve and a dilated ascending aorta. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2017; 10: e006249. 28592593
  15. [2]Potthast S, Mitsumori L, Stanescu LA, Measuring aortic diameter with different MR techniques: comparison of three-dimensional (3D) navigated steady-state free-precession (SSFP), 3D contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography (CE-MRA), 2D T2 black blood, and 2D cine SSFP. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2010; 31: 177– 184. 20027585
  16. [2]Martin ZL, Mastracci TM. The evaluation of aortic dissections with intravascular ultrasonography. Vasc Dis Manag. 2011; 8: E93– E97.
  17. [8]Otto CM, Nishimura RA, Bonow RO, 2020 ACC/AHA guideline for the management of patients with valvular heart disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Circulation. 2021; 143: e72– e227. 33332150
  18. [1]Hiratzka LF, Bakris GL, Beckman JA, 2010 ACCF/AHA/AATS/ACR/ASA/SCA/SCAI/SIR/STS/SVM guidelines for the diagnosis and management of patients with thoracic aortic disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines, American Association for Thoracic Surgery, American College of Radiology, American Stroke Association, Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Society of Interventional Radiology, Society of Thoracic Surgeons, and Society for Vascular Medicine. Circulation. 2010; 121: e266– e369. 20233780
  19. [3]Zafar MA, Li Y, Rizzo JA, Height alone, rather than body surface area, suffices for risk estimation in ascending aortic aneurysm. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2018; 155: 1938– 1950. 29395211
  20. [1]Vapnik JS, Kim JB, Isselbacher EM, Characteristics and outcomes of ascending versus descending thoracic aortic aneurysms. Am J Cardiol. 2016; 117: 1683– 1690. 27015890
  21. [2]Upchurch GR Jr, Escobar GC, Azizzdeh A, Society for Vascular Surgery clinical practice guidelines for thoracic endovascular aneurysm repair (Tevar). J Vasc Surg. 2021; 73: 55S– 83S. 32628988
  22. [19]Renard M, Francis C, Ghosh R, Clinical validity of genes for heritable thoracic aortic aneurysm and dissection. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018; 72: 605– 615. 30071989 PMC6378369
  23. [2]Albornoz G, Coady MA, Roberts M, Familial thoracic aortic aneurysms and dissections--incidence, modes of inheritance, and phenotypic patterns. Ann Thorac Surg. 2006; 82: 1400– 1405. 16996941
  24. [3]Robertson EN, van der Linde D, Sherrah AG, Familial non-syndromal thoracic aortic aneurysms and dissections - Incidence and family screening outcomes. Int J Cardiol. 2016; 220: 43– 51. 27372041
  25. [5]Robertson EN, van der Linde D, Sherrah AG, Familial non-syndromal thoracic aortic aneurysms and dissections-incidence and family screening outcomes. Int J Cardiol. 2016; 220: 43– 51. 27372041
  26. [6]Weinsaft JW, Devereux RB, Preiss LR, Aortic dissection in patients with genetically mediated aneurysms: incidence and predictors in the GenTAC registry. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016; 67: 2744– 2754. 27282895 PMC5040186
  27. [7]Albornoz G, Coady MA, Roberts M, Familial thoracic aortic aneurysms and dissections-incidence, modes of inheritance, and phenotypic patterns. Ann Thorac Surg. 2006; 82: 1400– 1405. 16996941
  28. [2]Goldstein SA, Evangelista A, Abbara S, Multimodality imaging of diseases of the thoracic aorta in adults: from the American Society of Echocardiography and the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2015; 28: 119– 182. 25623219
  29. [8]Hiratzka LF, Bakris GL, Beckman JA, 2010 ACCF/AHA/AATS/ACR/ASA/SCA/SCAI/SIR/STS/SVM guidelines for the diagnosis and management of patients with thoracic aortic disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines, American Association for Thoracic Surgery, American College of Radiology, American Stroke Association, Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Society of Interventional Radiology, Society of Thoracic Surgeons, and Society for Vascular Medicine. Circulation. 2010; 121: e266– e369. 20233780
  30. [12]Devereux RB, de Simone G, Arnett DK, Normal limits in relation to age, body size and gender of two-dimensional echocardiographic aortic root dimensions in persons ≥15 years of age. Am J Cardiol. 2012; 110: 1189– 1194. 22770936 PMC3462295
  31. [13]LeMaire SA, Carter SA, Volguina IV, Spectrum of aortic operations in 300 patients with confirmed or suspected Marfan syndrome. Ann Thorac Surg. 2006; 81: 2063– 2078; discussion 2078. 16731131
  32. [7]Hiratzka LF, Bakris GL, Beckman JA, 2010 ACCF/AHA/AATS/ACR/ASA/SCA/SCAI/SIR/STS/SVM guidelines for the diagnosis and management of patients with thoracic aortic disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines, American Association for Thoracic Surgery, American College of Radiology, American Stroke Association, Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Society of Interventional Radiology, Society of Thoracic Surgeons, and Society for Vascular Medicine. Circulation. 2010; 121: e266– e369. 20233780
  33. [1]Hiratzka LF, Bakris GL, Beckman JA, 2010 ACCF/AHA/AATS/ACR/ASA/SCA/SCAI/SIR/STS/SVM guidelines for the diagnosis and management of patients with thoracic aortic disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines, American Association for Thoracic Surgery, American College of Radiology, American Stroke Association, Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Society of Interventional Radiology, Society of Thoracic Surgeons, and Society for Vascular Medicine. Circulation. 2010; 121: e266– e369. 20233780
  34. [2]Erbel R, Aboyans V, Boileau C, 2014 ESC guidelines on the diagnosis and treatment of aortic diseases: document covering acute and chronic aortic diseases of the thoracic and abdominal aorta of the adult. The Task Force for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Aortic Diseases of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Eur Heart J. 2014; 35: 2873– 2926. 25173340
  35. [5]Svensson LG, Khitin L. Aortic cross-sectional area/height ratio timing of aortic surgery in asymptomatic patients with Marfan syndrome. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2002; 123: 360– 361. 11828302
  36. [7]Finkbohner R, Johnston D, Crawford ES, Marfan syndrome. Long-term survival and complications after aortic aneurysm repair. Circulation. 1995; 91: 728– 733. 7828300
  37. [8]Gott VL, Greene PS, Alejo DE, Replacement of the aortic root in patients with Marfan’s syndrome. N Engl J Med. 1999; 340: 1307– 1313. 10219065
  38. [9]Erbel R, Aboyans V, Boileau C, 2014 ESC guidelines on the diagnosis and treatment of aortic diseases: document covering acute and chronic aortic diseases of the thoracic and abdominal aorta of the adult. The Task Force for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Aortic Diseases of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Eur Heart J. 2014; 35: 2873– 2926. 25173340
  39. [10]Silverman DI, Burton KJ, Gray J, Life expectancy in the Marfan syndrome. Am J Cardiol. 1995; 75: 157– 160. 7810492
  40. [14]Roman MJ, Rosen SE, Kramer-Fox R, Prognostic significance of the pattern of aortic root dilation in the Marfan syndrome. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1993; 22: 1470– 1476. 8227807
  41. [1]den Hartog AW, Franken R, Zwinderman AH, The risk for type B aortic dissection in Marfan syndrome. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015; 65: 246– 254. 25614422
  42. [2]LeMaire SA, Carter SA, Volguina IV, Spectrum of aortic operations in 300 patients with confirmed or suspected Marfan syndrome. Ann Thorac Surg. 2006; 81: 2063– 2078; discussion 2078. 16731131
  43. [3]Hiratzka LF, Bakris GL, Beckman JA, 2010 ACCF/AHA/AATS/ACR/ASA/SCA/SCAI/SIR/STS/SVM guidelines for the diagnosis and management of patients with thoracic aortic disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines, American Association for Thoracic Surgery, American College of Radiology, American Stroke Association, Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Society of Interventional Radiology, Society of Thoracic Surgeons, and Society for Vascular Medicine. Circulation. 2010; 121: e266– e369. 20233780
  44. [8]Jondeau G, Ropers J, Regalado E, International Registry of Patients Carrying TGFBR1 or TGFBR2 Mutations: results of the MAC (Montalcino Aortic Consortium). Circ Cardiovasc Genet. 2016; 9: 548– 558. 27879313 PMC5177493
  45. [12]van der LD, van d LI, Bertoli-Avella AM, Aggressive cardiovascular phenotype of aneurysms-osteoarthritis syndrome caused by pathogenic SMAD3 variants. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012; 60: 397– 403. 22633655
  46. [14]Boileau C, Guo DC, Hanna N, TGFB2 mutations cause familial thoracic aortic aneurysms and dissections associated with mild systemic features of Marfan syndrome. Nat Genet. 2012; 44: 916– 921. 22772371 PMC4033668
  47. [17]Thakker PD, Braverman AC. Cardiogenetics: genetic testing in the diagnosis and management of patients with aortic disease. Heart. 2021; 107: 619– 626. 33334864
  48. [20]Regalado ES, Guo DC, Villamizar C, Exome sequencing identifies SMAD3 mutations as a cause of familial thoracic aortic aneurysm and dissection with intracranial and other arterial aneurysms. Circ Res. 2011; 109: 680– 686. 21778426 PMC4115811
  49. [1]MacCarrick G, Black JH 3rd, Bowdin S, Loeys-Dietz syndrome: a primer for diagnosis and management. Genet Med. 2014; 16: 576– 587. 24577266 PMC4131122
  50. [1]Loeys BL, Schwarze U, Holm T, Aneurysm syndromes caused by mutations in the TGF-beta receptor. N Engl J Med. 2006; 355: 788– 798. 16928994
  51. [2]Jondeau G, Ropers J, Regalado E, International Registry of Patients Carrying TGFBR1 or TGFBR2 Mutations: results of the MAC (Montalcino Aortic Consortium). Circ Cardiovasc Genet. 2016; 9: 548– 558. 27879313 PMC5177493
  52. [3]van der LD, van d LI, Bertoli-Avella AM, Aggressive cardiovascular phenotype of aneurysms-osteoarthritis syndrome caused by pathogenic SMAD3 variants. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012; 60: 397– 403. 22633655
  53. [4]Hostetler EM, Regalado ES, Guo DC, SMAD3 pathogenic variants: risk for thoracic aortic disease and associated complications from the Montalcino Aortic Consortium. J Med Genet. 2019; 56: 252– 260. 30661052
  54. [5]Boileau C, Guo DC, Hanna N, TGFB2 mutations cause familial thoracic aortic aneurysms and dissections associated with mild systemic features of Marfan syndrome. Nat Genet. 2012; 44: 916– 921. 22772371 PMC4033668
  55. [6]Lindsay ME, Schepers D, Bolar NA, Loss-of-function mutations in TGFB2 cause a syndromic presentation of thoracic aortic aneurysm. Nat Genet. 2012; 44: 922– 927. 22772368 PMC3616632
  56. [8]Bertoli-Avella AM, Gillis E, Morisaki H, Mutations in a TGF-beta ligand, TGFB3, cause syndromic aortic aneurysms and dissections. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015; 65: 1324– 1336. 25835445 PMC4380321
  57. [10]MacCarrick G, Black JH 3rd, Bowdin S, Loeys-Dietz syndrome: a primer for diagnosis and management. Genet Med. 2014; 16: 576– 587. 24577266 PMC4131122
  58. [13]Hostetler EM, Regalado ES, Guo DC, SMAD3 pathogenic variants: risk for thoracic aortic disease and associated complications from the Montalcino Aortic Consortium. J Med Genet. 2019; 56: 252– 260. 30661052
  59. [16]van der Linde D, van de Laar IM, Bertoli-Avella AM, Aggressive cardiovascular phenotype of aneurysms-osteoarthritis syndrome caused by pathogenic SMAD3 variants. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012; 60: 397– 403. 22633655
  60. [17]Tran-Fadulu V, Pannu H, Kim DH, Analysis of multigenerational families with thoracic aortic aneurysms and dissections due to TGFBR1 or TGFBR2 mutations. J Med Genet. 2009; 46: 607– 613. 19542084
  61. [18]Schoenhoff FS, Alejo DE, Black JH, Management of the aortic arch in patients with Loeys-Dietz syndrome. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2020; 160: 1166– 1175. 31627951
  62. [19]Jondeau G, Ropers J, Regalado E, International Registry of Patients Carrying TGFBR1 or TGFBR2 Mutations: results of the MAC (Montalcino Aortic Consortium). Circ Cardiovasc Genet. 2016; 9: 548– 558. 27879313 PMC5177493
  63. [20]Hiratzka LF, Bakris GL, Beckman JA, 2010 ACCF/AHA/AATS/ACR/ASA/SCA/SCAI/SIR/STS/SVM guidelines for the diagnosis and management of patients with thoracic aortic disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines, American Association for Thoracic Surgery, American College of Radiology, American Stroke Association, Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Society of Interventional Radiology, Society of Thoracic Surgeons, and Society for Vascular Medicine. Circulation. 2010; 121: e266– e369. 20233780
  64. [23]Bertoli-Avella AM, Gillis E, Morisaki H, Mutations in a TGF-beta ligand, TGFB3, cause syndromic aortic aneurysms and dissections. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015; 65: 1324– 1336. 25835445 PMC4380321
  65. [4]Erbel R, Aboyans V, Boileau C, 2014 ESC guidelines on the diagnosis and treatment of aortic diseases: document covering acute and chronic aortic diseases of the thoracic and abdominal aorta of the adult. The Task Force for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Aortic Diseases of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Eur Heart J. 2014; 35: 2873– 2926. 25173340
  66. [2]Guo DC, Pannu H, Papke CL, Mutations in smooth muscle alpha-actin (ACTA2) lead to thoracic aortic aneurysms and dissections. Nat Genet. 2007; 39: 1488– 1493. 17994018
  67. [5]Guo DC, Papke CL, Tran-Fadulu V, Mutations in smooth muscle alpha-actin (ACTA2) cause coronary artery disease, stroke, and moyamoya disease, along with thoracic aortic disease. Am J Hum Genet. 2009; 84: 617– 627. 19409525 PMC2680995
  68. [6]Milewicz DM, Ostergaard JR, la-Kokko LM, De novo ACTA2 mutation causes a novel syndrome of multisystemic smooth muscle dysfunction. Am J Med Genet A. 2010; 152A: 2437– 2443. 20734336 PMC3573757
  69. [7]Regalado ES, Guo DC, Prakash S, Aortic disease presentation and outcome associated with ACTA2 mutations. Circ Cardiovasc Genet. 2015; 8: 457– 464. 25759435 PMC4601641
  70. [9]Regalado ES, Guo DC, Prakash S, Aortic disease presentation and outcome associated with ACTA2 mutations. Circ Cardiovasc Genet. 2015; 8: 457– 464. 25759435 PMC4601641
  71. [11]Guo DC, Regalado E, Casteel DE, Recurrent gain-of-function mutation in PRKG1 causes thoracic aortic aneurysms and acute aortic dissections. Am J Hum Genet. 2013; 93: 398– 404. 23910461 PMC3738837
  72. [14]Zhu L, Vranckx R, Khau Van KP, Mutations in myosin heavy chain 11 cause a syndrome associating thoracic aortic aneurysm/aortic dissection and patent ductus arteriosus. Nat Genet. 2006; 38: 343– 349. 16444274
  73. [15]Wallace SE, Regalado ES, Gong L, MYLK pathogenic variants aortic disease presentation, pregnancy risk, and characterization of pathogenic missense variants. Genet Med. 2019; 21: 144– 151. 29925964 PMC6400320
  74. [3]Masri A, Kalahasti V, Svensson LG, Aortic cross-sectional area/height ratio and outcomes in patients with bicuspid aortic valve and a dilated ascending aorta. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2017; 10: e006249. 28592593
  75. [7]Loscalzo ML, Goh DL, Loeys B, Familial thoracic aortic dilation and bicommissural aortic valve: a prospective analysis of natural history and inheritance. Am J Med Genet A. 2007; 143: 1960– 1967. 17676603
  76. [8]Galian-Gay L, Carro Hevia A, Teixido-Tura G, Familial clustering of bicuspid aortic valve and its relationship with aortic dilation in first-degree relatives. Heart. 2019; 105: 603– 608. 30322846
  77. [16]Otto CM, Nishimura RA, Bonow RO, 2020 ACC/AHA guideline for the management of patients with valvular heart disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Circulation. 2021; 143: e72– e227. 33332150
  78. [2]Michelena HI, Khanna AD, Mahoney D, Incidence of aortic complications in patients with bicuspid aortic valves. JAMA. 2011; 306: 1104– 1112. 21917581
  79. [5]Verma S, Siu SC. Aortic dilatation in patients with bicuspid aortic valve. N Engl J Med. 2014; 370: 1920– 1929. 24827036
  80. [6]Masri A, Kalahasti V, Svensson LG, Aortic cross-sectional area/height ratio and outcomes in patients with bicuspid aortic valve and a dilated ascending aorta. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2017; 10: e006249. 28592593
  81. [7]Borger MA, Fedak PWM, Stephens EH, The American Association for Thoracic Surgery consensus guidelines on bicuspid aortic valve-related aortopathy: full online-only version. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2018; 156: e41– e74. 30011777 PMC6413866
  82. [8]McKellar SH, Michelena HI, Li Z, Long-term risk of aortic events following aortic valve replacement in patients with bicuspid aortic valves. Am J Cardiol. 2010; 106: 1626– 1633. 21094365
  83. [12]Devereux RB, de Simone G, Arnett DK, Normal limits in relation to age, body size and gender of two-dimensional echocardiographic aortic root dimensions in persons ≥15 years of age. Am J Cardiol. 2012; 110: 1189– 1194. 22770936 PMC3462295
  84. [1]Borger MA, Fedak PWM, Stephens EH, The American Association for Thoracic Surgery consensus guidelines on bicuspid aortic valve-related aortopathy: full online-only version. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2018; 156: e41– e74. 30011777 PMC6413866
  85. [2]Otto CM, Nishimura RA, Bonow RO, 2020 ACC/AHA guideline for the management of patients with valvular heart disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Circulation. 2021; 143: e72– e227. 33332150
  86. [3]Masri A, Kalahasti V, Svensson LG, Aortic cross-sectional area/height ratio and outcomes in patients with bicuspid aortic valve and a dilated ascending aorta. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2017; 10: e006249. 28592593
  87. [5]Wojnarski CM, Svensson LG, Roselli EE, Aortic dissection in patients with bicuspid aortic valve-associated aneurysms. Ann Thorac Surg. 2015; 100: 1666– 1673; discussion 1673–1674. 26209494 PMC5166604
  88. [6]Borger MA, Preston M, Ivanov J, Should the ascending aorta be replaced more frequently in patients with bicuspid aortic valve disease? J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2004; 128: 677– 683. 15514594
  89. [8]Michelena HI, Khanna AD, Mahoney D, Incidence of aortic complications in patients with bicuspid aortic valves. JAMA. 2011; 306: 1104– 1112. 21917581
  90. [9]Zafar MA, Li Y, Rizzo JA, Height alone, rather than body surface area, suffices for risk estimation in ascending aortic aneurysm. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2018; 155: 1938– 1950. 29395211
  91. [13]Girdauskas E, Disha K, Raisin HH, Risk of late aortic events after an isolated aortic valve replacement for bicuspid aortic valve stenosis with concomitant ascending aortic dilation. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2012; 42: 832– 837; discussion 837–838. 22466700
  92. [14]Girdauskas E, Disha K, Rouman M, Aortic events after isolated aortic valve replacement for bicuspid aortic valve root phenotype: echocardiographic follow-up study. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2015; 48: e71– e76. 26224339
  93. [15]Kim JB, Spotnitz M, Lindsay ME, Risk of aortic dissection in the moderately dilated ascending aorta. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016; 68: 1209– 1219. 27609684
  94. [4]Saeyeldin A, Zafar MA, Velasquez CA, Natural history of aortic root aneurysms in Marfan syndrome. Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2017; 6: 625– 632. 29270374 PMC5721101
  95. [5]Della Corte A, Bancone C, Buonocore M, Pattern of ascending aortic dimensions predicts the growth rate of the aorta in patients with bicuspid aortic valve. J Am Coll Cardiol Img. 2013; 6: 1301– 1310. 24269260
  96. [6]Kim JB, Spotnitz M, Lindsay ME, Risk of aortic dissection in the moderately dilated ascending aorta. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016; 68: 1209– 1219. 27609684
  97. [1]Smith SC Jr, Allen J, Blair SN, AHA/ACC guidelines for secondary prevention for patients with coronary and other atherosclerotic vascular disease: 2006 update. Circulation. 2006; 113: 2363– 2372. 16702489
  98. [2]Davies MJ. Aortic aneurysm formation: lessons from human studies and experimental models. Circulation. 1998; 98: 193– 195. 9697816
  99. [4]Ladouceur M, Fermanian C, Lupoglazoff JM, Effect of beta-blockade on ascending aortic dilatation in children with the Marfan syndrome. Am J Cardiol. 2007; 99: 406– 409. 17261408
  100. [5]Shores J, Berger KR, Murphy EA, Progression of aortic dilatation and the benefit of long-term beta-adrenergic blockade in Marfan’s syndrome. N Engl J Med. 1994; 330: 1335– 1341. 8152445
  101. [6]Al-Abcha A, Saleh Y, Mujer M, Meta-analysis examining the usefulness of angiotensin receptor blockers for the prevention of aortic root dilation in patients with the Marfan syndrome. Am J Cardiol. 2020; 128: 101– 106. 32650901
  102. [8]Danyi P, Elefteriades JA, Jovin IS. Medical therapy of thoracic aortic aneurysms: are we there yet? Circulation. 2011; 124: 1469– 1476. 21947934
  103. [1]Smith SC, Allen J, Blair SN, AHA/ACC guidelines for secondary prevention for patients with coronary and other atherosclerotic vascular disease: 2006 update. Circulation. 2006; 113: 2363– 2372. 16702489
  104. [3]Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults. Executive summary of the third report of the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults (Adult Treatment Panel III). JAMA. 2001; 285: 2486– 2497. 11368702
  105. [1]Whelton PK, Carey RM, Aronow WS, 2017 ACC/AHA/AAPA/ABC/ACPM/AGS/APhA/ASH/ASPC/NMA/PCNA guideline for the prevention, detection, evaluation, and management of high blood pressure in adults: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Hypertension. 2018; 71: 1269– 1324. 29133354
  106. [2]Lewington S, Clarke R, Qizilbash N, Age-specific relevance of usual blood pressure to vascular mortality: a meta-analysis of individual data for one million adults in 61 prospective studies. Lancet. 2002; 360: 1903– 1913. 12493255
  107. [3]Ogden LG, He J, Lydick E, Long-term absolute benefit of lowering blood pressure in hypertensive patients according to the JNC VI risk stratification. Hypertension. 2000; 35: 539– 543. 10679494
  108. [4]Group SR, Wright JT Jr, Williamson JD, A randomized trial of intensive versus standard blood-pressure control. N Engl J Med. 2015; 373: 2103– 2116. 26551272 PMC4689591
  109. [5]Vaduganathan M, Claggett BL, Juraschek SP, Assessment of long-term benefit of intensive blood pressure control on residual life span: secondary analysis of the Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial (SPRINT). JAMA Cardiol. 2020; 5: 576– 581. 32101262 PMC7240348
  110. [1]Whelton PK, Carey RM, Aronow WS, 2017 ACC/AHA/AAPA/ABC/ACPM/AGS/APhA/ASH/ASPC/NMA/PCNA guideline for the prevention, detection, evaluation, and management of high blood pressure in adults: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Hypertension. 2018; 71: 1269– 1324. 29133354
  111. [2]Lewington S, Clarke R, Qizilbash N, Age-specific relevance of usual blood pressure to vascular mortality: a meta-analysis of individual data for one million adults in 61 prospective studies. Lancet. 2002; 360: 1903– 1913. 12493255
  112. [3]Ogden LG, He J, Lydick E, Long-term absolute benefit of lowering blood pressure in hypertensive patients according to the JNC VI risk stratification. Hypertension. 2000; 35: 539– 543. 10679494
  113. [6]Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults. Executive summary of the third report of the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults (Adult Treatment Panel III). JAMA. 2001; 285: 2486– 2497. 11368702
  114. [7]Cholesterol Treatment Trialists’ (CTT) Collaboration, Baigent C, Blackwell L, Efficacy and safety of more intensive lowering of LDL cholesterol: a meta-analysis of data from 170,000 participants in 26 randomised trials. Lancet. 2010; 376: 1670– 1681. 21067804 PMC2988224
  115. [9]Grundy SM, Stone NJ, Bailey AL, 2018 AHA/ACC/AACVPR/AAPA/ABC/ACPM/ADA/AGS/APhA/ASPC/NLA/PCNA guideline on the management of blood cholesterol: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Circulation. 2019; 139: e1082– e1143. 30586774 PMC7403606
  116. [1]Katz DA, Holman JE, Nugent AS, The emergency department action in smoking cessation (EDASC) trial: impact on cessation outcomes. Nicotine Tob Res. 2013; 15: 1032– 1043. 23125437 PMC6080418
  117. [2]Whitlock EP, Orleans CT, Pender N, Evaluating primary care behavioral counseling interventions: an evidence-based approach. Am J Prev Med. 2002; 22: 267– 284. 11988383
  118. [4]Berry KM, Reynolds LM, Collins JM, E-cigarette initiation and associated changes in smoking cessation and reduction: the Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health Study, 2013–2015. Tob Control. 2019; 28: 42– 49. 29574448 PMC6317439
  119. [2]Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults. Executive summary of the third report of the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults (Adult Treatment Panel III). JAMA. 2001; 285: 2486– 2497. 11368702
  120. [3]Smith SC Jr, Allen J, Blair SN, AHA/ACC guidelines for secondary prevention for patients with coronary and other atherosclerotic vascular disease: 2006 update. Circulation. 2006; 113: 2363– 2372. 16702489
  121. [1]Hiratzka LF, Bakris GL, Beckman JA, 2010 ACCF/AHA/AATS/ACR/ASA/SCA/SCAI/SIR/STS/SVM guidelines for the diagnosis and management of patients with thoracic aortic disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines, American Association for Thoracic Surgery, American College of Radiology, American Stroke Association, Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Society of Interventional Radiology, Society of Thoracic Surgeons, and Society for Vascular Medicine. Circulation. 2010; 121: e266– e369. 20233780
  122. [2]Erbel R, Aboyans V, Boileau C, 2014 ESC guidelines on the diagnosis and treatment of aortic diseases: document covering acute and chronic aortic diseases of the thoracic and abdominal aorta of the adult. The Task Force for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Aortic Diseases of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Eur Heart J. 2014; 35: 2873– 2926. 25173340
  123. [3]Goldstein SA, Evangelista A, Abbara S, Multimodality imaging of diseases of the thoracic aorta in adults: from the American Society of Echocardiography and the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2015; 28: 119– 182. 25623219
  124. [8]Kuzmik GA, Sang AX, Elefteriades JA. Natural history of thoracic aortic aneurysms. J Vasc Surg. 2012; 56: 565– 571. 22840907
  125. [1]Erbel R, Aboyans V, Boileau C, 2014 ESC guidelines on the diagnosis and treatment of aortic diseases: document covering acute and chronic aortic diseases of the thoracic and abdominal aorta of the adult. The Task Force for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Aortic Diseases of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Eur Heart J. 2014; 35: 2873– 2926. 25173340
  126. [2]Brady AR, Thompson SG, Fowkes FG, Abdominal aortic aneurysm expansion: risk factors and time intervals for surveillance. Circulation. 2004; 110: 16– 21. 15210603
  127. [6]Hendy K, Gunnarson R, Golledge J. Growth rates of small abdominal aortic aneurysms assessed by computerised tomography-a systematic literature review. Atherosclerosis. 2014; 235: 182– 188. 24848928
  128. [11]Chaikof EL, Dalman RL, Eskandari MK, The Society for Vascular Surgery practice guidelines on the care of patients with an abdominal aortic aneurysm. J Vasc Surg. 2018; 67: 2– 77.e72. 29268916
  129. [4]Hiratzka LF, Bakris GL, Beckman JA, 2010 ACCF/AHA/AATS/ACR/ASA/SCA/SCAI/SIR/STS/SVM guidelines for the diagnosis and management of patients with thoracic aortic disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines, American Association for Thoracic Surgery, American College of Radiology, American Stroke Association, Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Society of Interventional Radiology, Society of Thoracic Surgeons, and Society for Vascular Medicine. Circulation. 2010; 121: e266– e369. 20233780
  130. [8]Davies RR, Goldstein LJ, Coady MA, Yearly rupture or dissection rates for thoracic aortic aneurysms: simple prediction based on size. Ann Thorac Surg. 2002; 73: 17– 27; discussion 27–28. 11834007
  131. [10]Avadhani SA, Martin-Doyle W, Shaikh AY, Predictors of ascending aortic dilation in bicuspid aortic valve disease: a five-year prospective study. Am J Med. 2015; 128: 647– 652. 25644322
  132. [13]Erbel R, Aboyans V, Boileau C, 2014 ESC guidelines on the diagnosis and treatment of aortic diseases: document covering acute and chronic aortic diseases of the thoracic and abdominal aorta of the adult. The Task Force for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Aortic Diseases of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Eur Heart J. 2014; 35: 2873– 2926. 25173340
  133. [14]Masri A, Kalahasti V, Svensson LG, Aortic cross-sectional area/height ratio and outcomes in patients with bicuspid aortic valve and a dilated ascending aorta. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2017; 10: e006249. 28592593
  134. [15]Masri A, Kalahasti V, Svensson LG, Aortic cross-sectional area/height ratio and outcomes in patients with a trileaflet aortic valve and a dilated aorta. Circulation. 2016; 134: 1724– 1737. 27770001
  135. [16]Wojnarski CM, Svensson LG, Roselli EE, Aortic dissection in patients with bicuspid aortic valve-associated aneurysms. Ann Thorac Surg. 2015; 100: 1666– 1673; discussion 1673–1674. 26209494 PMC5166604
  136. [17]Kim JB, Spotnitz M, Lindsay ME, Risk of aortic dissection in the moderately dilated ascending aorta. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016; 68: 1209– 1219. 27609684
  137. [23]Zafar MA, Li Y, Rizzo JA, Height alone, rather than body surface area, suffices for risk estimation in ascending aortic aneurysm. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2018; 155: 1938– 1950. 29395211
  138. [31]Rylski B, Blanke P, Beyersdorf F, How does the ascending aorta geometry change when it dissects? J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014; 63: 1311– 1319. 24509277
  139. [33]Saeyeldin A, Zafar MA, Li Y, Decision-making algorithm for ascending aortic aneurysm: effectiveness in clinical application? J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2019; 157: 1733– 1745. 30579535
  140. [34]Gagne-Loranger M, Dumont E, Voisine P, Natural history of 40–50 mm root/ascending aortic aneurysms in the current era of dedicated thoracic aortic clinics. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2016; 50: 562– 566. 27113091
  141. [37]Paruchuri V, Salhab KF, Kuzmik G, Aortic size distribution in the general population: explaining the size paradox in aortic dissection. Cardiology. 2015; 131: 265– 272. 25997607
  142. [38]Mori M, Shioda K, Wang X, Perioperative risk profiles and volume-outcome relationships in proximal thoracic aortic surgery. Ann Thorac Surg. 2018; 106: 1095– 1104. 29969620
  143. [40]Girdauskas E, Rouman M, Disha K, Aortic dissection after previous aortic valve replacement for bicuspid aortic valve disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015; 66: 1409– 1411. 26383730
  144. [43]Borger MA, Preston M, Ivanov J, Should the ascending aorta be replaced more frequently in patients with bicuspid aortic valve disease? J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2004; 128: 677– 683. 15514594
  145. [46]Kruger T, Sandoval Boburg R, Lescan M, Aortic elongation in aortic aneurysm and dissection: the Tubingen Aortic Pathoanatomy (TAIPAN) project. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2018; 54: 26– 33. 29373683
  146. [47]Wu J, Zafar MA, Li Y, Ascending aortic length and risk of aortic adverse events: the neglected dimension. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019; 74: 1883– 1894. 31526537
  147. [1]Mori M, Shioda K, Wang X, Perioperative risk profiles and volume-outcome relationships in proximal thoracic aortic surgery. Ann Thorac Surg. 2018; 106: 1095– 1104. 29969620
  148. [4]Hui SK, Fan CS, Christie S, The aortic root does not dilate over time after replacement of the aortic valve and ascending aorta in patients with bicuspid or tricuspid aortic valves. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2018; 156: 5– 13.e11. 29656818
  149. [5]Peterss S, Bhandari R, Rizzo JA, The aortic root: natural history after root-sparing ascending replacement in nonsyndromic aneurysmal patients. Ann Thorac Surg. 2017; 103: 828– 833. 27659602
  150. [19]Aftab M, Cikach FS, Zhu Y, Loeys-Dietz syndrome: intermediate-term outcomes of medically and surgically managed patients. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2019; 157: 439– 450.e5. 30669217
  151. [20]Patel ND, Crawford T, Magruder JT, Cardiovascular operations for Loeys-Dietz syndrome: intermediate-term results. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2017; 153: 406– 412. 27955909
  152. [22]Idrees JJ, Roselli EE, Blackstone EH, Risk of adding prophylactic aorta replacement to a cardiac operation. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2020; 159: 1669– 1678.e10. 31256966
  153. [23]Peterss S, Charilaou P, Dumfarth J, Aortic valve disease with ascending aortic aneurysm: Impact of concomitant root-sparing (supracoronary) aortic replacement in nonsyndromic patients. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2016; 152: 791– 798.e1. 27318616
  154. [25]Girdauskas E, Disha K, Raisin HH, Risk of late aortic events after an isolated aortic valve replacement for bicuspid aortic valve stenosis with concomitant ascending aortic dilation. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2012; 42: 832– 837; discussion 837–838. 22466700
  155. [1]Isselbacher EM. Thoracic and abdominal aortic aneurysms. Circulation. 2005; 111: 816– 828. 15710776
  156. [2]Coady MA, Rizzo JA, Hammond GL, What is the appropriate size criterion for resection of thoracic aortic aneurysms? J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1997; 113: 476– 491. 9081092
  157. [3]Erbel R, Aboyans V, Boileau C, 2014 ESC guidelines on the diagnosis and treatment of aortic diseases: document covering acute and chronic aortic diseases of the thoracic and abdominal aorta of the adult. The Task Force for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Aortic Diseases of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Eur Heart J. 2014; 35: 2873– 2926. 25173340
  158. [16]Regalado ES, Mellor-Crummey L, De BJ, Clinical history and management recommendations of the smooth muscle dysfunction syndrome due to ACTA2 arginine 179 alterations. Genet Med. 2018; 20: 1206– 1215. 29300374 PMC6034999
  159. [17]MacCarrick G, Black JH 3rd, Bowdin S, Loeys-Dietz syndrome: a primer for diagnosis and management. Genet Med. 2014; 16: 576– 587. 24577266 PMC4131122
  160. [19]Czerny M, Schmidli J, Adler S, Current options and recommendations for the treatment of thoracic aortic pathologies involving the aortic arch: an expert consensus document of the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic surgery (EACTS) and the European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS). Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2019; 55: 133– 162. 30312382
  161. [2]Davies RR, Goldstein LJ, Coady MA, Yearly rupture or dissection rates for thoracic aortic aneurysms: simple prediction based on size. Ann Thorac Surg. 2002; 73: 17– 27; discussion 27–28. 11834007
  162. [7]Girardi LN, Leonard JR, Lau C, Gender-related outcomes after open repair of descending thoracic and thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms. J Vasc Surg. 2019; 69: 1028– 1035.e1. 30292619
  163. [10]Matsumura JS, Cambria RP, Dake MD, International controlled clinical trial of thoracic endovascular aneurysm repair with the Zenith TX2 endovascular graft: 1-year results. J Vasc Surg. 2008; 47: 247– 257; discussion 257. 18241743
  164. [5]Patel HJ, Dake MD, Bavaria JE, Branched endovascular therapy of the distal aortic arch: preliminary results of the feasibility multicenter trial of the Gore Thoracic Branch Endoprosthesis. Ann Thorac Surg. 2016; 102: 1190– 1198. 27262912
  165. [4]Goodney PP, Travis L, Lucas FL, Survival after open versus endovascular thoracic aortic aneurysm repair in an observational study of the Medicare population. Circulation. 2011; 124: 2661– 2669. 22104552 PMC3281563
  166. [7]Vaddineni SK, Taylor SM, Patterson MA, Outcome after celiac artery coverage during endovascular thoracic aortic aneurysm repair: preliminary results. J Vasc Surg. 2007; 45: 467– 471. 17254741
  167. [2]Lomazzi C, Mascoli C, de Beaufort HWL, Gender related access complications after TEVAR: analysis from the Retrospective Multicentre Cohort GORE® GREAT Registry Study. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2020; 60: 203– 209. 32402803
  168. [6]Makaroun MS, Dillavou ED, Kee ST, Endovascular treatment of thoracic aortic aneurysms: results of the phase II multicenter trial of the GORE TAG thoracic endoprosthesis. J Vasc Surg. 2005; 41: 1– 9. 15696036
  169. [7]Matsumura JS, Cambria RP, Dake MD, International controlled clinical trial of thoracic endovascular aneurysm repair with the Zenith TX2 endovascular graft: 1-year results. J Vasc Surg. 2008; 47: 247– 257; discussion 257. 18241743
  170. [8]Fairman RM, Criado F, Farber M, Pivotal results of the Medtronic Vascular Talent Thoracic Stent Graft System: the VALOR trial. J Vasc Surg. 2008; 48: 546– 554. 18572352
  171. [1]Kim JB, Kim K, Lindsay ME, Risk of rupture or dissection in descending thoracic aortic aneurysm. Circulation. 2015; 132: 1620– 1629. 26338955
  172. [2]Davies RR, Goldstein LJ, Coady MA, Yearly rupture or dissection rates for thoracic aortic aneurysms: simple prediction based on size. Ann Thorac Surg. 2002; 73: 17– 27; discussion 27–28. 11834007
  173. [3]Zafar MA, Chen JF, Wu J, Natural history of descending thoracic and thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2021; 161: 498– 511.e1. 31982126
  174. [4]Lobato AC, Puech-Leao P. Predictive factors for rupture of thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm. J Vasc Surg. 1998; 27: 446– 453. 9580243
  175. [3]Goodney PP, Travis L, Lucas FL, Survival after open versus endovascular thoracic aortic aneurysm repair in an observational study of the Medicare population. Circulation. 2011; 124: 2661– 2669. 22104552 PMC3281563
  176. [1]Coselli JS, LeMaire SA, Preventza O, Outcomes of 3309 thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm repairs. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2016; 151: 1323– 1337. 26898979
  177. [3]Girardi LN, Lau C, Ohmes LB, Open repair of descending and thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms in octogenarians. J Vasc Surg. 2018; 68: 1287– 1296.e3. 29606567
  178. [9]Hiratzka LF, Bakris GL, Beckman JA, 2010 ACCF/AHA/AATS/ACR/ASA/SCA/SCAI/SIR/STS/SVM guidelines for the diagnosis and management of patients with thoracic aortic disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines, American Association for Thoracic Surgery, American College of Radiology, American Stroke Association, Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Society of Interventional Radiology, Society of Thoracic Surgeons, and Society for Vascular Medicine. Circulation. 2010; 121: e266– e369. 20233780
  179. [10]Erbel R, Aboyans V, Boileau C, 2014 ESC guidelines on the diagnosis and treatment of aortic diseases: document covering acute and chronic aortic diseases of the thoracic and abdominal aorta of the adult. The Task Force for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Aortic Diseases of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Eur Heart J. 2014; 35: 2873– 2926. 25173340
  180. [2]Coselli JS, LeMaire SA, Preventza O, Outcomes of 3309 thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm repairs. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2016; 151: 1323– 1337. 26898979
  181. [4]Khan FM, Naik A, Hameed I, Open repair of descending thoracic and thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms: a meta-analysis. Ann Thorac Surg. 2020; 110: 1941– 1949. 32504596
  182. [11]Sweeting MJ, Thompson SG, Brown LC, Meta-analysis of individual patient data to examine factors affecting growth and rupture of small abdominal aortic aneurysms. Br J Surg. 2012; 99: 655– 665. 22389113
  183. [16]Chaikof EL, Dalman RL, Eskandari MK, The Society for Vascular Surgery practice guidelines on the care of patients with an abdominal aortic aneurysm. J Vasc Surg. 2018; 67: 2– 77.e72. 29268916
  184. [8]Patel R, Sweeting MJ, Powell JT, Endovascular versus open repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm in 15-years’ follow-up of the UK endovascular aneurysm repair trial 1 (EVAR trial 1): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2016; 388: 2366– 2374. 27743617
  185. [12]Schanzer A, Greenberg RK, Hevelone N, Predictors of abdominal aortic aneurysm sac enlargement after endovascular repair. Circulation. 2011; 123: 2848– 2855. 21478500
  186. [20]Varkevisser RRB, Swerdlow NJ, de Guerre L, Five-year survival following endovascular repair of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms is improving. J Vasc Surg. 2020; 72: 105– 113.e4. 32093908
  187. [7]Ameli-Renani S, Das R, Morgan RA. Thoracic endovascular aortic repair for the treatment of aortic dissection: post-operative imaging, complications and secondary interventions. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2015; 38: 1391– 1404. 25799947
  188. [10]Tanaka A, Leonard SD, Sandhu HK, Open descending and thoracoabdominal aortic repairs in patients younger than 50 years old. Ann Thorac Surg. 2019; 108: 693– 699. 31009630
  189. [13]Peterss S, Charilaou P, Dumfarth J, Aortic valve disease with ascending aortic aneurysm: Impact of concomitant root-sparing (supracoronary) aortic replacement in nonsyndromic patients. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2016; 152: 791– 798.e1. 27318616
  190. [15]Wang TKM, Desai MY. Thoracic aortic aneurysm: optimal surveillance and treatment. Cleve Clin J Med. 2020; 87: 557– 568. 32868306
  191. [17]Makaroun MS, Dillavou ED, Wheatley GH, Five-year results of endovascular treatment with the Gore TAG device compared with open repair of thoracic aortic aneurysms. J Vasc Surg. 2008; 47: 912– 918. 18353605
  192. [1]Sternbergh WC 3rd, Greenberg RK, Chuter TA, Redefining postoperative surveillance after endovascular aneurysm repair: recommendations based on 5-year follow-up in the US Zenith multicenter trial. J Vasc Surg. 2008; 48: 278– 284; discussion 84–85. 18572368
  193. [13]Brenner DJ, Hall EJ. Computed tomography--an increasing source of radiation exposure. N Engl J Med. 2007; 357: 2277– 2284. 18046031
  194. [16]Kawada H, Goshima S, Sakurai K, Utility of noncontrast magnetic resonance angiography for aneurysm follow-up and detection of endoleaks after endovascular aortic repair. Korean J Radiol. 2021; 22: 513– 524. 33543842 PMC8005350
  195. [22]Chaikof EL, Dalman RL, Eskandari MK, The Society for Vascular Surgery practice guidelines on the care of patients with an abdominal aortic aneurysm. J Vasc Surg. 2018; 67: 2– 77.e72. 29268916
  196. [4]Bossone E, LaBounty TM, Eagle KA. Acute aortic syndromes: diagnosis and management, an update. Eur Heart J. 2018; 39: 739d– 749d. 29106452
  197. [5]Hiratzka LF, Bakris GL, Beckman JA, 2010 ACCF/AHA/AATS/ACR/ASA/SCA/SCAI/SIR/STS/SVM guidelines for the diagnosis and management of patients with thoracic aortic disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines, American Association for Thoracic Surgery, American College of Radiology, American Stroke Association, Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Society of Interventional Radiology, Society of Thoracic Surgeons, and Society for Vascular Medicine. Circulation. 2010; 121: e266– e369. 20233780
  198. [5]Chen SW, Chan YH, Lin CP, Association of long-term use of antihypertensive medications with late outcomes among patients with aortic dissection. JAMA Netw Open. 2021; 4: e210469. 33656527 PMC7930924
  199. [10]Qin YL, Wang F, Li TX, Endovascular Repair Compared With Medical Management of Patients With Uncomplicated Type B Acute Aortic Dissection. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016; 67: 2835– 2842. 27311522
  200. [1]Suzuki T, Isselbacher EM, Nienaber CA, Type-selective benefits of medications in treatment of acute aortic dissection (from the International Registry of Acute Aortic Dissection [IRAD]). Am J Cardiol. 2012; 109: 122– 127. 21944678

200 of 368 shown

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Isselbacher, E. M., Preventza, O., Hamilton Black, J., Augoustides, J. G., Beck, A. W., Bolen, M. A., Braverman, A. C., Bray, B. E., Brown-Zimmerman, M. M., Chen, E. P., Collins, T. J., DeAnda, A., Fanola, C. L., Girardi, L. N., Hicks, C. W., Hui, D. S., Schuyler Jones, W., Kalahasti, V., Kim, K. M., Milewicz, D. M., Oderich, G. S., Ogbechie, L., Promes, S. B., Gyang Ross, E., Schermerhorn, M. L., Singleton Times, S., Tseng, E. E., Wang, G. J., Woo, Y. J., Faxon, D. P., Upchurch, G. R., Aday, A. W., Azizzadeh, A., Boisen, M., Hawkins, B., Kramer, C. M., Luc, J. G. Y., MacGillivray, T. E., Malaisrie, S. C., Osteen, K., Patel, H. J., Patel, P. J., Popescu, W. M., Rodriguez, E., Sorber, R., Tsao, P. S., & Santos Volgman, A.
Affiliations
  • SCA representative.
  • ACR representative.
  • American Heart Association (US)
  • Lay stakeholder representative.
  • Fraunhofer Institute for Algorithms and Scientific Computing (DE)
  • AATS representative.
  • American Hospital Association (US)
  • AHA/ACC Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines liaison.
  • STS representative.
  • SVS representative.
  • AHA/ACC staff representative.
Venue
Circulation
Published
2022-12-13
Volume
146
Issue
24
Pages
e334-e482
ISSN
  • 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-4539
OpenAlex
W4307934708
Cited by
2,082
References
1,104
Citations by year
2026: 600 · 2025: 569 · 2024: 554 · 2023: 348 · 2022: 9
FWCI
239.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Circulation (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs
  • American Heart Association
  • Massachusetts General Hospital
  • American College of Cardiology Foundation
  • University of Pennsylvania
  • CryoLife
  • Office of Science
  • National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (K23DK124515)
  • Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Anschutz Medical Campus
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Aortic Disease and Treatment Approaches
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Connective tissue disorders research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Aortic aneurysm repair treatments
Keywords
aortic disease, thoracic aortic disease, acute aortic syndrome, aortic aneurysm, aortic dissection, bicuspid aortic valve disease, peripheral arterial disease, genetic evaluation, family screening, endovascular repair, aortic surgery, long-term surveillance, shared decision-making, pregnancy
MeSH terms
Bicuspid Aortic Valve Disease, American Heart Association, Aortic Diseases, Cardiology, Female, Humans, Pregnancy, United States, Research Report

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review