The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Biobehavioral Home-Based Intervention and the Well-being of Patients With Dementia and Their Caregivers: The COPE Randomized Trial
Open accessAbstract
CONTEXT: Optimal treatment to postpone functional decline in patients with dementia is not established. OBJECTIVE: To test a nonpharmacologic intervention realigning environmental demands with patient capabilities. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Prospective 2-group randomized trial (Care of Persons with Dementia in their Environments [COPE]) involving patients with dementia and family caregivers (community-living dyads) recruited from March 2006 through June 2008 in Pennsylvania. INTERVENTIONS: Up to 12 home or telephone contacts over 4 months by health professionals who assessed patient capabilities and deficits; obtained blood and urine samples; and trained families in home safety, simplifying tasks, and stress reduction. Control group caregivers received 3 telephone calls and educational materials. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Functional dependence, quality of life, frequency of agitated behaviors, and engagement for patients and well-being, confidence using activities, and perceived benefits for caregivers at 4 months. RESULTS: Of 284 dyads screened, 270 (95%) were eligible and 237 (88%) randomized. Data were collected from 209 dyads (88%) at 4 months and 173 (73%) at 9 months. At 4 months, compared with controls, COPE patients had less functional dependence (adjusted mean difference, 0.24; 95% CI, 0.03-0.44; P = .02; Cohen d = 0.21) and less dependence in instrumental activities of daily living (adjusted mean difference, 0.32; 95% CI, 0.09-0.55; P = .007; Cohen d = 0.43), measured by a 15-item scale modeled after the Functional Independence Measure; COPE patients also had improved engagement (adjusted mean difference, 0.12; 95% CI, 0.07-0.22; P = .03; Cohen d = 0.26), measured by a 5-item scale. COPE caregivers improved in their well-being (adjusted mean difference in Perceived Change Index, 0.22; 95% CI, 0.08-0.36; P = .002; Cohen d = 0.30) and confidence using activities (adjusted mean difference, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.30-1.32; P = .002; Cohen d = 0.54), measured by a 5-item scale. By 4 months, 64 COPE dyads (62.7%) vs 48 control group dyads (44.9%) eliminated 1 or more caregiver-identified problems (chi(2/1) = 6.72, P = . 01). CONCLUSION: Among community-living dyads, a nonpharmacologic biobehavioral environmental intervention compared with control resulted in better outcomes for COPE dyads at 4 months. Although no group differences were observed at 9 months for patients, COPE caregivers perceived greater benefits. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00259454.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Kok, J. S., Berg, I. J., & Scherder, E. J. A. (2013) · Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders Extra · doi:10.1159/000353441 · Cited by 20,589
Assessing Quality of Life in Older Adults With Cognitive Impairment
Logsdon, R. G., Gibbons, L. E., McCurry, S. M., & Teri, L. (2002) · Psychosomatic Medicine · doi:10.1097/00006842-200205000-00016 · Cited by 1,381
Dementia care: mental health effects, intervention strategies, and clinical implications
Sörensen, S., Duberstein, P., Gill, D., & Pinquart, M. (2006) · The Lancet Neurology · doi:10.1016/s1474-4422(06)70599-3 · Cited by 396 · cited 2×
“Recent psychosocial caregiver interventions showed caregiver improvements, but benefits either did not extend to patients with dementia or did not address functional dependence.(12,13) Building on previous nonpharmacologic approaches and best clinical practices,(14) we designed the Care of Persons with Dementia in the…”
Gitlin, L. N., Winter, L., Corcoran, M., Dennis, M. P., Schinfeld, S., & Hauck, W. W. (2003) · The Gerontologist · doi:10.1093/geront/43.4.532 · Cited by 271
Gitlin, L. N., Winter, L., Dennis, M. P., Hodgson, N., & Hauck, W. W. (2010) · Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · doi:10.1111/j.1532-5415.2010.02971.x · Cited by 257
Self-citationBelle, S. H., Burgio, L., Burns, R., Coon, D., Czaja, S. J., Gallagher-Thompson, D., Gitlin, L. N., Klinger, J., Koepke, K. M., Lee, C. C., et al. (2006) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-145-10-200611210-00005 · Cited by 23
Self-citation
Cited by
Dementia prevention, intervention, and care
Livingston, G., Sommerlad, A., Orgeta, V., Costafreda, S. G., Huntley, J., Ames, D., Ballard, C., Banerjee, S., Burns, A., Cohen-Mansfield, J., et al. (2017) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(17)31363-6 · Cited by 6,072
Self-citationAssessment and management of behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia
Kales, H. C., Gitlin, L. N., & Lyketsos, C. G. (2015) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.h369 · Cited by 1,247
Self-citationKales, H. C., Gitlin, L. N., Lyketsos, C. G., & Dementia, T. D. E. P. O. T. A. A. M. O. T. N. S. O. (2014) · Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · doi:10.1111/jgs.12730 · Cited by 575
Self-citationAbraha, I., Rimland, J. M., Trotta, F. M., Dell'Aquila, G., Cruz-Jentoft, A., Petrovic, M., Gudmundsson, A., Soiza, R., O'Mahony, D., Guaita, A., et al. (2017) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012759 · Cited by 557
Nonpharmacologic Management of Behavioral Symptoms in Dementia
Gitlin, L. N., Kales, H. C., & Lyketsos, C. G. (2012) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2012.36918 · Cited by 495
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Gitlin, L. N., Winter, L., Dennis, M. P., Hodgson, N., & Hauck, W. W.
- Venue
- JAMA
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 2010-09-01
- Volume
- 304
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 983
- ISSN
- 0002-9955 (ISSN-L)
- 0098-7484
- OpenAlex
- W2163645531
- Cited by
- 367
- References
- 7
- FWCI
- 10.37
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.