Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 183

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Operator Experience and Carotid Stenting Outcomes in Medicare Beneficiaries

Open access
Nallamothu, Brahmajee K., Gurm, Hitinder S., Ting, Henry H., Goodney, Philip P., Rogers, Mary A. M., Curtis, Jeptha P., Dimick, Justin B., Bates, Eric R., Krumholz, Harlan M., Birkmeyer, John D.·2011·JAMA

Abstract

CONTEXT: Although the efficacy of carotid stenting has been established in clinical trials, outcomes of the procedure based on operator experience are less certain in clinical practice. OBJECTIVE: To assess association between outcomes and 2 measures of operator experience: annual volume and experience at the time of the procedure among new operators who first performed carotid stenting after a national coverage decision by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS). DESIGN, SETTING, AND PATIENTS: Observational study using administrative data on fee-for-service Medicare beneficiaries aged 65 years or older undergoing carotid stenting between 2005 and 2007. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Thirty-day mortality stratified by very low, low, medium, and high annual operator volumes (<6, 6-11, 12-23, and ≥24 procedures per year, respectively) and treatment early vs late during a new operator's experience (1st to 11th procedure and 12th procedure or higher). RESULTS: During the study period, 24,701 procedures were performed by 2339 operators. Of these, 11,846 were performed by 1792 new operators who first performed carotid stenting after the CMS national coverage decision. Overall, 30-day mortality was 1.9% (n = 461) and rate of failure to use an embolic protection device was 4.8% (n = 1173). The median annual operator volume among Medicare beneficiaries was 3.0 per year (interquartile range, 1.4-6.5) and 11.6% of operators performed 12 or more procedures per year during the study period. Observed 30-day mortality was higher among patients treated by operators with lower annual volumes (2.5% [95% CI, 2.1%-2.9%], 1.9% [95% CI, 1.6%-2.3%], 1.6% [95% CI, 1.3%-1.9%], and 1.4% [95% CI, 1.1%-1.7%] across the 4 categories; P < .001) and among patients treated early (2.3%; 95% CI, 2.0%-2.7%) vs late (1.4%; 95% CI, 1.1%-1.9%; P < .001) during a new operator's experience. After multivariable adjustment, patients treated by very low-volume operators had a higher risk of 30-day mortality compared with patients treated by high-volume operators (adjusted odds ratio, 1.9; 95% CI, 1.4-2.7; P < .001). Similarly, we found a higher risk of 30-day mortality in patients treated early vs late during a new operator's experience (adjusted odds ratio, 1.7; 95% CI, 1.2-2.4; P = .001). CONCLUSION: Among older patients undergoing carotid stenting, lower annual operator volume and early experience are associated with increased 30-day mortality.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/jama.2011.1357

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 183

Metadata

Authors
Nallamothu, B. K., Gurm, H. S., Ting, H. H., Goodney, P. P., Rogers, M. A. M., Curtis, J. P., Dimick, J. B., Bates, E. R., Krumholz, H. M., & Birkmeyer, J. D.
Venue
JAMA
Published
2011-09-28
Volume
306
Issue
12
Pages
1338
ISSN
  • 0002-9955 (ISSN-L)
  • 0098-7484
OpenAlex
W1964460097
Cited by
183
References
2
FWCI
18.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Operator Experience and Carotid Stenting Outcomes in Medicare Beneficiaries. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/jama.2011.1357
The paper
Nallamothu, B. K., Gurm, H. S., Ting, H. H., Goodney, P. P., Rogers, M. A. M., Curtis, J. P., Dimick, J. B., Bates, E. R., Krumholz, H. M., & Birkmeyer, J. D. (2011). Operator Experience and Carotid Stenting Outcomes in Medicare Beneficiaries. JAMA. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2011.1357

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.