Cited by 2,200Chronic Disease Management StrategiesMedical Coding and Health InformationCardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes

A modification of the elixhauser comorbidity measures into a point system for hospital death using administrative data

van Walraven, Carl, Austin, Peter C., Jennings, Alison, Quan, Hude, Forster, Alan J.·2009·Medical Care

Abstract

Background Comorbidity measures are necessary to describe patient populations and adjust for confounding. In direct comparisons, studies have found the Elixhauser comorbidity system to be statistically slightly superior to the Charlson comorbidity system at adjusting for comorbidity. However, the Elixhauser classification system requires 30 binary variables, making its use for reporting and analysis of comorbidity cumbersome. Objective Modify the Elixhauser classification system into a single numeric score for administrative data. Methods For all hospitalizations at the Ottawa Hospital, Canada, between 1996 and 2008, we determined if International Classification of Disease codes for chronic diagnoses were in any of the 30 Elixhauser comorbidity groups. We then used backward stepwise multivariate logistic regression to determine the independent association of each comorbidity group with death in hospital. Regression coefficients were modified into a scoring system that reflected the strength of each comorbidity group's independent association with hospital death. Results Hospitalizations that were included were 345,795 (derivation: 228,565; validation 117,230). Twenty-one of the 30 groups were independently associated with hospital mortality. The resulting comorbidity score had an equivalent discrimination in the derivation and validation groups (overall c-statistic 0.763, 95% CI: 0.759-0.766). This was similar to models having all Elixhauser groups (0.760, 95% CI: 0.756-0.764…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/mlr.0b013e31819432e5

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
van Walraven, C., Austin, P. C., Jennings, A., Quan, H., & Forster, A. J.
Affiliations
  • Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences (CA)
  • University of Calgary (CA)
Corresponding author
  • Jennings, Alison
  • Forster, Alan J.
Venue
Medical Care
Published
2009-06
Volume
47
Issue
6
Pages
626-633
ISSN
0025-7079 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2045030413
Cited by
2,200
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 182 · 2025: 191 · 2024: 260 · 2023: 232 · 2022: 242 · 2021: 222 · 2020: 205 · 2019: 141 · 2018: 129 · 2017: 108 · 2016: 87 · 2015: 73 · 2014: 52 · 2013: 40 · 2012: 16
FWCI
7.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Medical Care (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Chronic Disease Management Strategies
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Medical Coding and Health Information
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes
Keywords
comorbidity index, in-hospital mortality, Charlson Comorbidity Index, administrative data, ICD-10 codes, chronic disease burden, risk adjustment
MeSH terms
Health Services Research, Hospital Administration, Hospitals, Teaching, Humans, Models, Statistical, Cohort Studies, Comorbidity, Hospital Mortality, Risk Adjustment, International Classification of Diseases

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review