Cited by 43Thoreau and American LiteratureElectronic Health Records SystemsMobile Health and mHealth Applications

The HIPAA Conundrum in the Era of Mobile Health and Communications

Wang, C. Jason, Huang, Delphine J.·2013·JAMA

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/jama.2013.219869

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wang, C. J., & Huang, D. J.
Affiliations
University of California, San Francisco (US)
Venue
JAMA
Published
2013-09-18
Volume
310
Issue
11
Pages
1121
ISSN
  • 0002-9955 (ISSN-L)
  • 0098-7484
OpenAlex
W2006213980
Cited by
42
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 2 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 1
FWCI
15.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • JAMA (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institutes of Health (1dp2od008647-01)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Thoreau and American Literature
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Electronic Health Records Systems
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
Keywords
HIPAA, mobile health, health information privacy, patient data security, health communication, health data regulation
MeSH terms
Confidentiality, Humans, United States, Computer Security, Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act, Access to Information, Cell Phone, Electronic Health Records, Health Communication, Meaningful Use, Health Information Systems

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review