Effects of High vs Low Glycemic Index of Dietary Carbohydrate on Cardiovascular Disease Risk Factors and Insulin Sensitivity: The OmniCarb Randomized Clinical Trial
Open accessAbstract
IMPORTANCE: Foods that have similar carbohydrate content can differ in the amount they raise blood glucose. The effects of this property, called the glycemic index, on risk factors for cardiovascular disease and diabetes are not well understood. OBJECTIVE: To determine the effect of glycemic index and amount of total dietary carbohydrate on risk factors for cardiovascular disease and diabetes. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Randomized crossover-controlled feeding trial conducted in research units in academic medical centers, in which 163 overweight adults (systolic blood pressure, 120-159 mm Hg) were given 4 complete diets that contained all of their meals, snacks, and calorie-containing beverages, each for 5 weeks, and completed at least 2 study diets. The first participant was enrolled April 1, 2008; the last participant finished December 22, 2010. For any pair of the 4 diets, there were 135 to 150 participants contributing at least 1 primary outcome measure. INTERVENTIONS: (1) A high-glycemic index (65% on the glucose scale), high-carbohydrate diet (58% energy); (2) a low-glycemic index (40%), high-carbohydrate diet; (3) a high-glycemic index, low-carbohydrate diet (40% energy); and (4) a low-glycemic index, low-carbohydrate diet. Each diet was based on a healthful DASH-type diet. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The 5 primary outcomes were insulin sensitivity, determined from the areas under the curves of glucose and insulin levels during an oral glucose tolerance test; levels of low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, and triglycerides; and systolic blood pressure. RESULTS: At high dietary carbohydrate content, the low- compared with high-glycemic index level decreased insulin sensitivity from 8.9 to 7.1 units (-20%, P = .002); increased LDL cholesterol from 139 to 147 mg/dL (6%, P ≤ .001); and did not affect levels of HDL cholesterol, triglycerides, or blood pressure. At low carbohydrate content, the low- compared with high-glycemic index level did not affect the outcomes except for decreasing triglycerides from 91 to 86 mg/dL (-5%, P = .02). In the primary diet contrast, the low-glycemic index, low-carbohydrate diet, compared with the high-glycemic index, high-carbohydrate diet, did not affect insulin sensitivity, systolic blood pressure, LDL cholesterol, or HDL cholesterol but did lower triglycerides from 111 to 86 mg/dL (-23%, P ≤ .001). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: In this 5-week controlled feeding study, diets with low glycemic index of dietary carbohydrate, compared with high glycemic index of dietary carbohydrate, did not result in improvements in insulin sensitivity, lipid levels, or systolic blood pressure. In the context of an overall DASH-type diet, using glycemic index to select specific foods may not improve cardiovascular risk factors or insulin resistance. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00608049.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Diets rich in low-carbohydrate and low-glycemic-index foods may improve both glycemic control and cardiovascular risk factors.
“There is also evidence that diets rich in low-carbohydrate and low-glycemic-index foods may improve both glycemic control and cardiovascular risk factors.146,147”
From Clinical management of stable coronary artery disease in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association (2020) · cites this paper as [147]
Findings from the OmniCarb study suggested that low glycemic compared to high-glycemic index foods did not improve insulin sensitivity.
“Findings from the study suggested that low glycemic compared to high-glycemic index foods did not improve insulin sensitivity.”
From Benefits of low carbohydrate diets: a settled question or still controversial? (2021) · cites this paper as [92]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 48 · Cited by 239
- Authors
- Sacks, F. M., Carey, V. J., Anderson, C. A. M., Miller, E. R., Copeland, T., Charleston, J., Harshfield, B. J., Laranjo, N., McCarron, P., Swain, J., White, K., Yee, K., & Appel, L. J.
- Affiliations
- Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
- Johns Hopkins University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Sacks, Frank M.
- ORCID
- Venue
- JAMA
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 2014-12-17
- Volume
- 312
- Issue
- 23
- Pages
- 2531
- ISSN
- 0002-9955 (ISSN-L)
- 0098-7484
- PMC
- PMC4370345
- OpenAlex
- W2107325413
- Cited by
- 239
- References
- 48
- Citations by year
- 2026: 11 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 29 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 26 · 2017: 25 · 2016: 30 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 2 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 23.29
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- JAMA (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Digital Access to Scholarship at Harvard (DASH) (Harvard University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Funders
- Brigham and Women's Hospital
- Harvard Catalyst
- National Institutes of Health (5r21dk098720-02)
- U.S. Public Health Service (M01-02635)
- National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (R01HL084568)
- National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (R21 DK098720, R21 DK098720-02)
- National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (8UL1TR0001750-05)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Food composition and properties
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diet, Metabolism, and Disease
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Nutritional Studies and Diet
- Keywords
- glycemic index, dietary carbohydrates, low-carbohydrate diet, insulin sensitivity, cardiovascular risk factors, LDL cholesterol, triglycerides, HDL cholesterol, systolic blood pressure, DASH diet, overweight adults, oral glucose tolerance test, diabetes risk, dietary intervention, dyslipidemia, hypertension, hypertriglyceridemia
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Blood Glucose, Blood Pressure, Energy Intake, Cardiovascular Diseases, Dietary Carbohydrates, Female, Humans, Insulin Resistance, Cholesterol, HDL, Cholesterol, LDL, Male, Middle Aged, Risk Factors, Triglycerides, Glycemic Index, Diet, Carbohydrate-Restricted
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review