The DOI matches its Crossref record; 111 of the 111 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Diagnosis and Treatment of Clostridium difficile in Adults: A Systematic Review
Open accessAbstract
IMPORTANCE: Since 2000, the incidence and severity of Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) have increased. OBJECTIVE: To review current evidence regarding best practices for the diagnosis and treatment of CDI in adults (age ≥ 18 years). EVIDENCE REVIEW: Ovid MEDLINE and Cochrane databases were searched using keywords relevant to the diagnosis and treatment of CDI in adults. Articles published between January 1978 and October 31, 2014, were selected for inclusion based on targeted keyword searches, manual review of bibliographies, and whether the article was a guideline, systematic review, or meta-analysis published within the past 10 years. Of 4682 articles initially identified, 196 were selected for full review. Of these, the most pertinent 116 articles were included. Clinical trials, large observational studies, and more recently published articles were prioritized in the selection process. FINDINGS: Laboratory testing cannot distinguish between asymptomatic colonization and symptomatic infection with C difficile. Diagnostic approaches are complex due to the availability of multiple testing strategies. Multistep algorithms using polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for the toxin gene(s) or single-step PCR on liquid stool samples have the best test performance characteristics (for multistep: sensitivity was 0.68-1.00 and specificity was 0.92-1.00; and for single step: sensitivity was 0.86-0.92 and specificity was 0.94-0.97). Vancomycin and metronidazole are first-line therapies for most patients, although treatment failures have been associated with metronidazole in severe or complicated cases of CDI. Recent data demonstrate clinical success rates of 66.3% for metronidazole vs 78.5% for vancomycin for severe CDI. Newer therapies show promising results, including fidaxomicin (similar clinical cure rates to vancomycin, with lower recurrence rates for fidaxomicin, 15.4% vs vancomycin, 25.3%; P = .005) and fecal microbiota transplantation (response rates of 83%-94% for recurrent CDI). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Diagnostic testing for CDI should be performed only in symptomatic patients. Treatment strategies should be based on disease severity, history of prior CDI, and the individual patient's risk of recurrence. Vancomycin is the treatment of choice for severe or complicated CDI, with or without adjunctive therapies. Metronidazole is appropriate for mild disease. Fidaxomicin is a therapeutic option for patients with recurrent CDI or a high risk of recurrence. Fecal microbiota transplantation is associated with symptom resolution of recurrent CDI but its role in primary and severe CDI is not established.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Duodenal Infusion of Donor Feces for Recurrent Clostridium difficile
van Nood, E., Vrieze, A., Nieuwdorp, M., Fuentes, S., Zoetendal, E. G., de Vos, W. M., Visser, C. E., Kuijper, E. J., Bartelsman, J. F. W. M., Tijssen, J. G. P., et al. (2013) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1205037 · Cited by 3,708
Cohen, S. H., Gerding, D. N., Johnson, S., Kelly, C. P., Loo, V. G., McDonald, L. C., Pepin, J., & Wilcox, M. H. (2010) · Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology · doi:10.1086/651706 · Cited by 2,942
Zimlichman, E., Henderson, D., Tamir, O., Franz, C., Song, P., Yamin, C. K., Keohane, C., Denham, C. R., & Bates, D. W. (2013) · JAMA Internal Medicine · doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.9763 · Cited by 1,847
Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of Clostridium difficile infections
Surawicz, C. M., Brandt, L. J., Binion, D. G., Ananthakrishnan, A. N., Curry, S. R., Gilligan, P. H., McFarland, L. V., Mellow, M., & Zuckerbraun, B. S. (2013) · American Journal of Gastroenterology · doi:10.1038/ajg.2013.4 · Cited by 1,645
Fidaxomicin versus Vancomycin for Clostridium difficile Infection
Louie, T. J., Miller, M. A., Mullane, K. M., Weiss, K., Lentnek, A., Golan, Y., Gorbach, S., Sears, P., & Shue, Y.-K. (2011) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa0910812 · Cited by 1,585
Antibiotic-associated pseudomembranous colitis due to toxin-producing clostridia
Bartlett, J. G., Chang, T. W., Gurwith, M., Gorbach, S. L., & Onderdonk, A. B. (1978) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm197803092981003 · Cited by 1,374
Kelly, C. P., Pothoulakis, C., & LaMont, J. T. (1994) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199401273300406 · Cited by 1,321
Zar, F. A., Bakkanagari, S. R., Moorthi, K. M. L. S. T., & Davis, M. B. (2007) · Clinical Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1086/519265 · Cited by 1,252
Debast, S. B., Bauer, M. P., & Kuijper, E. J. (2014) · Clinical Microbiology and Infection · doi:10.1111/1469-0691.12418 · Cited by 1,215
Pepin, J. (2004) · Canadian Medical Association Journal · doi:10.1503/cmaj.1041104 · Cited by 1,128
Cited by
Magro, F., Gionchetti, P., Eliakim, R., Ardizzone, S., Armuzzi, A., Barreiro-de Acosta, M., Burisch, J., Gecse, K. B., Hart, A. L., Hindryckx, P., et al. (2017) · Journal of Crohn's and Colitis · doi:10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjx008 · Cited by 1,910
An insight into gut microbiota and its functionalities
Adak, A., & Khan, M. R. (2019) · Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences · doi:10.1007/s00018-018-2943-4 · Cited by 1,485
Kang, D.-W., Adams, J. B., Gregory, A. C., Borody, T., Chittick, L., Fasano, A., Khoruts, A., Geis, E., Maldonado, J., McDonough-Means, S., et al. (2017) · Microbiome · doi:10.1186/s40168-016-0225-7 · Cited by 1,391
Blauwkamp, T. A., Thair, S., Rosen, M. J., Blair, L., Lindner, M. S., Vilfan, I. D., Kawli, T., Christians, F. C., Venkatasubrahmanyam, S., Wall, G. D., et al. (2019) · Nature Microbiology · doi:10.1038/s41564-018-0349-6 · Cited by 962
Long-term benefit of microbiota transfer therapy on autism symptoms and gut microbiota
Kang, D.-W., Adams, J. B., Coleman, D. M., Pollard, E. L., Maldonado, J., McDonough-Means, S., Caporaso, J. G., & Krajmalnik-Brown, R. (2019) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-019-42183-0 · Cited by 749
Metadata
- Authors
- Bagdasarian, N., Rao, K., & Malani, P. N.
- Venue
- JAMA
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 2015-01-27
- Volume
- 313
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 398
- ISSN
- 0002-9955 (ISSN-L)
- 0098-7484
- OpenAlex
- W2011542551
- Cited by
- 451
- References
- 111
- FWCI
- 49.87
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Diagnosis and Treatment of Clostridium difficile in Adults: A Systematic Review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/jama.2014.17103
- The paper
- Bagdasarian, N., Rao, K., & Malani, P. N. (2015). Diagnosis and Treatment of Clostridium difficile in Adults: A Systematic Review. JAMA. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2014.17103
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.