The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Anesthesia Technique, Mortality, and Length of Stay After Hip Fracture Surgery
Open accessAbstract
IMPORTANCE: More than 300,000 hip fractures occur each year in the United States. Recent practice guidelines have advocated greater use of regional anesthesia for hip fracture surgery. OBJECTIVE: To test the association of regional (ie, spinal or epidural) anesthesia vs general anesthesia with 30-day mortality and hospital length of stay after hip fracture. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PATIENTS: We conducted a matched retrospective cohort study involving patients 50 years or older who were undergoing surgery for hip fracture at general acute care hospitals in New York State between July 1, 2004, and December 31, 2011. Our main analysis was a near-far instrumental variable match that paired patients who lived at different distances from hospitals that specialized in regional or general anesthesia. Supplementary analyses included a within-hospital match that paired patients within the same hospital and an across-hospital match that paired patients at different hospitals. EXPOSURES: Spinal or epidural anesthesia; general anesthesia. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Thirty-day mortality and hospital length of stay. Because the distribution of length of stay had long tails, we characterized this outcome using the Huber M estimate with Huber weights, a robust estimator similar to a trimmed mean. RESULTS: Of 56,729 patients, 15,904 (28%) received regional anesthesia and 40,825 (72%) received general anesthesia. Overall, 3032 patients (5.3%) died. The M estimate of the length of stay was 6.2 days (95% CI, 6.2 to 6.2). The near-far matched analysis showed no significant difference in 30-day mortality by anesthesia type among the 21,514 patients included in this match: 583 of 10,757 matched patients (5.4%) who lived near a regional anesthesia-specialized hospital died vs 629 of 10,757 matched patients (5.8%) who lived near a general anesthesia-specialized hospital (instrumental variable estimate of risk difference, -1.1%; 95% CI, -2.8 to 0.5; P = .20). Supplementary analyses of within and across hospital patient matches yielded mortality findings to be similar to the main analysis. In the near-far match, regional anesthesia was associated with a 0.6-day shorter length of stay than general anesthesia (95% CI, -0.8 to -0.4, P < .001). Supplementary analyses also showed regional anesthesia to be associated with shorter length of stay, although the observed association was smaller in magnitude than in the main analysis. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Among adults in acute care hospitals in New York State undergoing hip repair, the use of regional anesthesia compared with general anesthesia was not associated with lower 30-day mortality but was associated with a modestly shorter length of stay. These findings do not support a mortality benefit for regional anesthesia in this setting.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Comorbidity measures for use with administrative data.
Elixhauser, A., Steiner, C., Harris, D. R., & Coffey, R. M. (1998) · Medical Care · doi:10.1097/00005650-199801000-00004 · Cited by 9,921
Robust estimation of a location parameter
Huber, P. J. (1964) · The Annals of Mathematical Statistics · doi:10.1214/aoms/1177703732 · Cited by 7,228
Design of Observational Studies
Rosenbaum, P. R. (2010) · Springer Series in Statistics · doi:10.1007/978-1-4419-1213-8 · Cited by 1,150
Self-citationFailure-to-Rescue: Comparing Definitions to Measure Quality of Care
Silber, J. H., Romano, P. S., Rosen, A. K., Wang, Y., Even-Shoshan, O., & Volpp, K. G. (2007) · Medical Care · doi:10.1097/mlr.0b013e31812e01cc · Cited by 333
Self-citation
Cited by
Spinal Anesthesia or General Anesthesia for Hip Surgery in Older Adults
Neuman, M. D., Feng, R., Carson, J. L., Gaskins, L. J., Dillane, D., Sessler, D. I., Sieber, F., Magaziner, J., Marcantonio, E. R., Mehta, S., et al. (2021) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa2113514 · Cited by 478
Self-citationAnaesthesia for hip fracture surgery in adults
Guay, J., Parker, M. J., Gajendragadkar, P. R., & Kopp, S. (2016) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd000521.pub3 · Cited by 477
Grieve, R., O’Neill, S., Basu, A., Keele, L., Rowan, K. M., & Harris, S. (2019) · JAMA Network Open · doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.7704 · Cited by 31
Metadata
- Authors
- Neuman, M. D., Rosenbaum, P. R., Ludwig, J. M., Zubizarreta, J. R., & Silber, J. H.
- Venue
- JAMA
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 2014-06-25
- Volume
- 311
- Issue
- 24
- Pages
- 2508
- ISSN
- 0002-9955 (ISSN-L)
- 0098-7484
- OpenAlex
- W2085548231
- Cited by
- 303
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 28.97
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Anesthesia Technique, Mortality, and Length of Stay After Hip Fracture Surgery. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/jama.2014.6499
- The paper
- Neuman, M. D., Rosenbaum, P. R., Ludwig, J. M., Zubizarreta, J. R., & Silber, J. H. (2014). Anesthesia Technique, Mortality, and Length of Stay After Hip Fracture Surgery. JAMA. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2014.6499
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.