Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 478

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 27 of the 27 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Spinal Anesthesia or General Anesthesia for Hip Surgery in Older Adults

Open access
Neuman, Mark D., Feng, Rui, Carson, Jeffrey L., Gaskins, Lakisha J., Dillane, Derek, Sessler, Daniel I., Sieber, Frederick, Magaziner, Jay, Marcantonio, Edward R., Mehta, Samir, Menio, Diane, Ayad, Sabry, Stone, Trevor, Papp, Steven, Schwenk, Eric S., Elkassabany, Nabil, Marshall, Mitchell, Jaffe, J. Douglas, Luke, Charles, Sharma, Balram, Azim, Syed, Hymes, Robert A., Chin, Ki-Jinn, Sheppard, Richard, Perlman, Barry, Sappenfield, Joshua, Hauck, Ellen, Hoeft, Mark A., Giska, Mark, Ranganath, Yatish, Tedore, Tiffany, Choi, Stephen, Li, Jinlei, Kwofie, M. Kwesi, Nader, Antoun, Sanders, Robert D., Allen, Brian F.S., Vlassakov, Kamen, Kates, Stephen, Fleisher, Lee A., Dattilo, James, Tierney, Ann, Stephens-Shields, Alisa J., Ellenberg, Susan S.·2021·New England Journal of Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The effects of spinal anesthesia as compared with general anesthesia on the ability to walk in older adults undergoing surgery for hip fracture have not been well studied. METHODS: We conducted a pragmatic, randomized superiority trial to evaluate spinal anesthesia as compared with general anesthesia in previously ambulatory patients 50 years of age or older who were undergoing surgery for hip fracture at 46 U.S. and Canadian hospitals. Patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive spinal or general anesthesia. The primary outcome was a composite of death or an inability to walk approximately 10 ft (3 m) independently or with a walker or cane at 60 days after randomization. Secondary outcomes included death within 60 days, delirium, time to discharge, and ambulation at 60 days. RESULTS: A total of 1600 patients were enrolled; 795 were assigned to receive spinal anesthesia and 805 to receive general anesthesia. The mean age was 78 years, and 67.0% of the patients were women. A total of 666 patients (83.8%) assigned to spinal anesthesia and 769 patients (95.5%) assigned to general anesthesia received their assigned anesthesia. Among patients in the modified intention-to-treat population for whom data were available, the composite primary outcome occurred in 132 of 712 patients (18.5%) in the spinal anesthesia group and 132 of 733 (18.0%) in the general anesthesia group (relative risk, 1.03; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.84 to 1.27; P = 0.83). An inability to walk independently at 60 days was reported in 104 of 684 patients (15.2%) and 101 of 702 patients (14.4%), respectively (relative risk, 1.06; 95% CI, 0.82 to 1.36), and death within 60 days occurred in 30 of 768 (3.9%) and 32 of 784 (4.1%), respectively (relative risk, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.59 to 1.57). Delirium occurred in 130 of 633 patients (20.5%) in the spinal anesthesia group and in 124 of 629 (19.7%) in the general anesthesia group (relative risk, 1.04; 95% CI, 0.84 to 1.30). CONCLUSIONS: Spinal anesthesia for hip-fracture surgery in older adults was not superior to general anesthesia with respect to survival and recovery of ambulation at 60 days. The incidence of postoperative delirium was similar with the two types of anesthesia. (Funded by the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute; REGAIN ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02507505.).

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1056/nejmoa2113514

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 27 references

Cited by

See all 478

Metadata

Authors
Neuman, M. D., Feng, R., Carson, J. L., Gaskins, L. J., Dillane, D., Sessler, D. I., Sieber, F., Magaziner, J., Marcantonio, E. R., Mehta, S., Menio, D., Ayad, S., Stone, T., Papp, S., Schwenk, E. S., Elkassabany, N., Marshall, M., Jaffe, J. D., Luke, C., Sharma, B., Azim, S., Hymes, R. A., Chin, K.-J., Sheppard, R., Perlman, B., Sappenfield, J., Hauck, E., Hoeft, M. A., Giska, M., Ranganath, Y., Tedore, T., Choi, S., Li, J., Kwofie, M. K., Nader, A., Sanders, R. D., Allen, B. F. S., Vlassakov, K., Kates, S., Fleisher, L. A., Dattilo, J., Tierney, A., Stephens-Shields, A. J., & Ellenberg, S. S.
Venue
New England Journal of Medicine
Published
2021-11-25
Volume
385
Issue
22
Pages
2025-2035
ISSN
  • 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-4406
OpenAlex
W3203869118
Cited by
478
References
27
FWCI
63.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Spinal Anesthesia or General Anesthesia for Hip Surgery in Older Adults. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1056/nejmoa2113514
The paper
Neuman, M. D., Feng, R., Carson, J. L., Gaskins, L. J., Dillane, D., Sessler, D. I., Sieber, F., Magaziner, J., Marcantonio, E. R., Mehta, S., Menio, D., Ayad, S., Stone, T., Papp, S., Schwenk, E. S., Elkassabany, N., Marshall, M., Jaffe, J. D., Luke, C., . . . Ellenberg, S. S. (2021). Spinal Anesthesia or General Anesthesia for Hip Surgery in Older Adults. New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa2113514

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.