The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Comparison of Site of Death, Health Care Utilization, and Hospital Expenditures for Patients Dying With Cancer in 7 Developed Countries
Open accessAbstract
IMPORTANCE: Differences in utilization and costs of end-of-life care among developed countries are of considerable policy interest. OBJECTIVE: To compare site of death, health care utilization, and hospital expenditures in 7 countries: Belgium, Canada, England, Germany, the Netherlands, Norway, and the United States. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Retrospective cohort study using administrative and registry data from 2010. Participants were decedents older than 65 years who died with cancer. Secondary analyses included decedents of any age, decedents older than 65 years with lung cancer, and decedents older than 65 years in the United States and Germany from 2012. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Deaths in acute care hospitals, 3 inpatient measures (hospitalizations in acute care hospitals, admissions to intensive care units, and emergency department visits), 1 outpatient measure (chemotherapy episodes), and hospital expenditures paid by insurers (commercial or governmental) during the 180-day and 30-day periods before death. Expenditures were derived from country-specific methods for costing inpatient services. RESULTS: The United States (cohort of decedents aged >65 years, N = 211,816) and the Netherlands (N = 7216) had the lowest proportion of decedents die in acute care hospitals (22.2.% and 29.4%, respectively). A higher proportion of decedents died in acute care hospitals in Belgium (N = 21,054; 51.2%), Canada (N = 20,818; 52.1%), England (N = 97,099; 41.7%), Germany (N = 24,434; 38.3%), and Norway (N = 6636; 44.7%). In the last 180 days of life, 40.3% of US decedents had an intensive care unit admission compared with less than 18% in other reporting nations. In the last 180 days of life, mean per capita hospital expenditures were higher in Canada (US $21,840), Norway (US $19,783), and the United States (US $18,500), intermediate in Germany (US $16,221) and Belgium (US $15,699), and lower in the Netherlands (US $10,936) and England (US $9342). Secondary analyses showed similar results. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Among patients older than 65 years who died with cancer in 7 developed countries in 2010, end-of-life care was more hospital-centric in Belgium, Canada, England, Germany, and Norway than in the Netherlands or the United States. Hospital expenditures near the end of life were higher in the United States, Norway, and Canada, intermediate in Germany and Belgium, and lower in the Netherlands and England. However, intensive care unit admissions were more than twice as common in the United States as in other countries.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Report of the Lancet Commission on the Value of Death: Bringing death back into life
Sallnow, L., Smith, R., Ahmedzai, S. H., Bhadelia, A., Chamberlain, C., Cong, Y., Doble, B., Dullie, L., Durie, R., Finkelstein, E. A., et al. (2022) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(21)02314-x · Cited by 807
Approximately One In Three US Adults Completes Any Type Of Advance Directive For End-Of-Life Care
Yadav, K. N., Gabler, N. B., Cooney, E., Kent, S., Kim, J., Herbst, N., Mante, A., Halpern, S. D., & Courtright, K. R. (2017) · Health Affairs · doi:10.1377/hlthaff.2017.0175 · Cited by 608
Self-citationBakken, I. J., Ariansen, A. M. S., Knudsen, G. P., Johansen, K. I., & Vollset, S. E. (2020) · Scandinavian Journal of Public Health · doi:10.1177/1403494819859737 · Cited by 344
Nipp, R. D., El‐Jawahri, A., Moran, S. M., D'Arpino, S. M., Johnson, P. C., Lage, D. E., Wong, R. L., Pirl, W. F., Traeger, L., Lennes, I. T., et al. (2017) · Cancer · doi:10.1002/cncr.30912 · Cited by 230
Physicians’ Views on Advance Care Planning and End-of-Life Care Conversations.
Fulmer, T., Escobedo, M., Berman, A., Koren, M. J., Hernández, S., & Hult, A. (2018) · Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · doi:10.1111/jgs.15374 · Cited by 173
Metadata
- Authors
- Bekelman, J. E., Halpern, S. D., Blankart, C. R., Bynum, J. P., Cohen, J., Fowler, R., Kaasa, S., Kwietniewski, L., Melberg, H. O., Onwuteaka-Philipsen, B., Oosterveld-Vlug, M., Pring, A., Schreyögg, J., Ulrich, C. M., Verne, J., Wunsch, H., Emanuel, E. J., & for the International Consortium for End-of-Life Research (ICELR)
- Venue
- JAMA
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 2016-01-19
- Volume
- 315
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 272
- ISSN
- 0002-9955 (ISSN-L)
- 0098-7484
- OpenAlex
- W2266179496
- Cited by
- 510
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 65.59
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Comparison of Site of Death, Health Care Utilization, and Hospital Expenditures for Patients Dying With Cancer in 7 Developed Countries. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/jama.2015.18603
- The paper
- Bekelman, J. E., Halpern, S. D., Blankart, C. R., Bynum, J. P., Cohen, J., Fowler, R., Kaasa, S., Kwietniewski, L., Melberg, H. O., Onwuteaka-Philipsen, B., Oosterveld-Vlug, M., Pring, A., Schreyögg, J., Ulrich, C. M., Verne, J., Wunsch, H., Emanuel, E. J., & for the International Consortium for End-of-Life Research (ICELR). (2016). Comparison of Site of Death, Health Care Utilization, and Hospital Expenditures for Patients Dying With Cancer in 7 Developed Countries. JAMA. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2015.18603
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.