The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Antimicrobial Resistance
Abstract
IMPORTANCE: The development of antibiotics is considered among the most important advances of modern science. Antibiotics have saved millions of lives. However, antimicrobial resistance (AMR) threatens this progress and presents significant risks to human health. OBJECTIVE: To identify factors associated with AMR, the current epidemiology of important resistant organisms, and possible solutions to the AMR problem. DATA SOURCES, STUDY SELECTION, AND DATA SYNTHESIS: PubMed (2000-2016), NIH REPORTER, and ClinicalTrials.gov databases were searched for articles and entries related to AMR, focusing on epidemiology, clinical effects of AMR, discovery of novel agents to treat AMR bacterial infections, and nonpharmacological strategies to eliminate or modify AMR bacteria. In addition to articles and entries found in these databases, selected health policy reports and public health guidance documents were reviewed. Of 217 articles, databases, and reports identified, 103 were selected for review. RESULTS: The increase in AMR has been driven by a diverse set of factors, including inappropriate antibiotic prescribing and sales, use of antibiotics outside of the health care sector, and genetic factors intrinsic to bacteria. The problem has been exacerbated by inadequate economic incentives for pharmaceutical development of new antimicrobial agents. A range of specific AMR concerns, including carbapenem- and colistin-resistant gram-negative organisms, pose a clinical challenge. Alternative approaches to address the AMR threat include new methods of antibacterial drug identification and strategies that neutralize virulence factors. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Antimicrobial resistance poses significant challenges for current clinical care. Modified use of antimicrobial agents and public health interventions, coupled with novel antimicrobial strategies, may help mitigate the effect of multidrug-resistant organisms in the future.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Evaluation and Management of Penicillin Allergy: A Review
Shenoy, E. S., Macy, E., Rowe, T., & Blumenthal, K. G. (2019) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2018.19283 · Cited by 830
Teshome, B. F., Vouri, S. M., Hampton, N., Kollef, M. H., & Micek, S. T. (2019) · Pharmacotherapy: The Journal of Human Pharmacology and Drug Therapy · doi:10.1002/phar.2201 · Cited by 190
Sakeena, M. H. F., Bennett, A. A., & McLachlan, A. J. (2018) · Antimicrobial Resistance & Infection Control · doi:10.1186/s13756-018-0351-z · Cited by 174
Godman, B., Haque, M., McKimm, J., Abu Bakar, M., Sneddon, J., Wale, J., Campbell, S., Martin, A. P., Hoxha, I., Abilova, V., et al. (2020) · Current Medical Research and Opinion · doi:10.1080/03007995.2019.1700947 · Cited by 171
Sakeena, M. H. F., Bennett, A. A., & McLachlan, A. J. (2018) · International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents · doi:10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2018.09.022 · Cited by 157
Metadata
- Authors
- Marston, H. D., Dixon, D. M., Knisely, J. M., Palmore, T. N., & Fauci, A. S.
- Venue
- JAMA
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 2016-09-20
- Volume
- 316
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 1193
- ISSN
- 0002-9955 (ISSN-L)
- 0098-7484
- OpenAlex
- W4245505926
- Cited by
- 638
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 32.13
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Antimicrobial Resistance. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/jama.2016.11764
- The paper
- Marston, H. D., Dixon, D. M., Knisely, J. M., Palmore, T. N., & Fauci, A. S. (2016). Antimicrobial Resistance. JAMA. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2016.11764
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.