Cited by 190Antibiotic Use and ResistanceAntibiotic Resistance in BacteriaAntibiotics Pharmacokinetics and Efficacy

Duration of exposure to antipseudomonal β-lactam antibiotics in the critically ill and development of new resistance.

Open access
Teshome, Besu F., Vouri, Scott Martin, Hampton, Nicholas, Kollef, Marin H., Micek, Scott T.·2019·Pharmacotherapy: The Journal of Human Pharmacology and Drug Therapy

Abstract

Study Objective: Minimizing the duration of broad‐spectrum antimicrobial exposure in the critically ill is a commonly used strategy aimed at preventing resistance. Our objective was to correlate the duration of exposure to antipseudomonal β‐lactam antibiotics with the development of new resistance in critically ill patients. Design: Single‐center, retrospective cohort study. Setting: A large, academic, tertiary care hospital. Patients: A total of 7118 adults with a discharge diagnosis of severe sepsis or septic shock who received at least one dose of cefepime, meropenem, or piperacillin‐tazobactam during their hospitalization between 2010 and 2015. Measurements and Main Results: Cohort entry was defined as the first day of any antipseudomonal β‐lactam initiation, and exposure was defined as the cumulative days of any antipseudomonal β‐lactam exposure during the 60‐day follow‐up period. The primary outcome was development of new resistance to any antipseudomonal β‐lactam > 3 days after cohort entry. New resistance was defined as detection of resistance to any antipseudomonal β‐lactam not identified within 180 days before cohort entry. Patients without an outcome (i.e., did not develop new resistance) or who died by day 60 were censored. Cox proportional hazards models were performed to assess the risk of development of new resistance to any antipseudomonal β‐lactam with each additional day of exposure. Analyses of each individual antipseudomonal β‐lactam were evaluated as secondary outcomes. Each additional day of exposure to any antipseudomonal β‐lactam resulted in an adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) of 1.04 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.04–1.05) for new resistance development. The risk of developing new resistance to cefepime, meropenem, and piperacillin‐tazobactam for each additional day of exposure resulted in an aHR of 1.08 (95% CI 1.07–1.09), 1.02 (95% CI 1.01–1.03), and 1.08 (95% CI 1.06–1.09), respectively. Conclusion: Among critically ill patients who receive antipseudomonal β‐lactam antibiotics, each additional day of exposure to cefepime, meropenem, and piperacillin‐tazobactam is associated with an increased risk of new resistance development.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/phar.2201

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Potential harms of unnecessary antimicrobials include allergic or hypersensitivity reactions, kidney injury, thrombocytopenia, Clostridioides difficile infection, and antimicrobial resistance.

    “These include a range of adverse events such as allergic or hypersensitivity reactions, kidney injury, thrombocytopenia, Clostridioides difficile infection, and antimicrobial resistance [101–106].”
  • The increasing emphasis on administering immediate antibiotics to all patients with possible sepsis may be driving increased use of unnecessarily broad-spectrum antibiotics, antibiotic-associated adverse events, and antimicrobial resistance without benefitting patients.

    “The increasing emphasis on administering immediate antibiotics to all patients with possible sepsis may therefore be driving increased use of unnecessarily broad-spectrum antibiotics, antibiotic-associated adverse events, and antimicrobial resistance without benefitting patients.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Teshome, B. F., Vouri, S. M., Hampton, N., Kollef, M. H., & Micek, S. T.
Affiliations
  • University of Health Sciences and Pharmacy (US)
  • University of Florida Health (US)
  • BJC HealthCare (US)
  • Washington University in St. Louis (US)
Corresponding author
Micek, Scott T.
Venue
Pharmacotherapy: The Journal of Human Pharmacology and Drug Therapy
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2019-01-07
Volume
39
Issue
3
Pages
261-270
ISSN
  • 0277-0008 (ISSN-L)
  • 1875-9114
OpenAlex
W2902532896
Cited by
190
References
14
Citations by year
2026: 19 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 33 · 2023: 33 · 2022: 37 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 9
FWCI
7.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Pharmacotherapy The Journal of Human Pharmacology and Drug Therapy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • Foundation for Barnes-Jewish Hospital
  • National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (KL2TR000450)
  • Institute of Clinical and Translational Sciences (UL1TR000448)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology › Antibiotic Use and Resistance
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Medicine › Antibiotic Resistance in Bacteria
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Antibiotics Pharmacokinetics and Efficacy
Keywords
antimicrobial resistance, critically ill patients, sepsis, septic shock, cefepime, meropenem, piperacillin-tazobactam, broad-spectrum antibiotics, resistance development, antibiotic stewardship, intensive care unit, nosocomial infections, carbapenem resistance, extended-spectrum beta-lactamase, metallo-beta-lactamase, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Acinetobacter baumannii, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Escherichia coli, Klebsiella oxytoca, Klebsiella aerophila
MeSH terms
Aged, Anti-Bacterial Agents, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Retrospective Studies, Shock, Septic, Time Factors, Cohort Studies, Critical Illness, Sepsis, Drug Resistance, Multiple, Bacterial, beta-Lactams, Tertiary Care Centers

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review