Cited by 93Pharmaceutical Economics and PolicyBiomedical Ethics and RegulationHealthcare Regulation

New “21st Century Cures” Legislation: Speed and Ease vs Science

Kesselheim, Aaron S., Avorn, Jerry·2017·JAMA

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/jama.2016.20640

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kesselheim, A. S., & Avorn, J.
Affiliations
Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
Venue
JAMA
Published
2017-02-14
Volume
317
Issue
6
Pages
581
ISSN
  • 0002-9955 (ISSN-L)
  • 0098-7484
OpenAlex
W2569503431
Cited by
93
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 22 · 2016: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
29.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • JAMA (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Pharmaceutical Economics and Policy
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Biomedical Ethics and Regulation
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Healthcare Regulation
Keywords
21st Century Cures Act, drug approval, drug development, regulatory policy, pharmaceutical law
MeSH terms
Budgets, Drug Industry, Financing, Government, National Institutes of Health (U.S.), Politics, Research Support as Topic, Science, United States, United States Food and Drug Administration, Drug Approval

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review