Cited by 173Patient-Provider Communication in HealthcarePalliative Care and End-of-Life IssuesEthics and bioethics in healthcare

Prime time for shared decision making

Spatz, Erica S., Krumholz, Harlan M., Moulton, Benjamin W.·2017·JAMA

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/jama.2017.0616

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Patients who engage in shared decision-making tend to choose nonsurgical treatment alternatives.

    “In our experience, when thoroughly informed on potential benefits, harms, and drawbacks of medical and surgical treatments, most women not seeking conception express their preference for the former option (21), thus confirming that patients who engage in shared decision-making tend to choose nonsurgical treatment alternatives (62).”
  • In the authors' experience, when thoroughly informed on potential benefits, harms, and drawbacks of medical and surgical treatments, most women not seeking conception express their preference for the former option.

    “In our experience, when thoroughly informed on potential benefits, harms, and drawbacks of medical and surgical treatments, most women not seeking conception express their preference for the former option (21), thus confirming that patients who engage in shared decision-making tend to choose nonsurgical treatment alternatives (62).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Spatz, E. S., Krumholz, H. M., & Moulton, B. W.
Affiliations
  • Yale New Haven Hospital (US)
  • Healthwise (US)
Venue
JAMA
Published
2017-04-04
Volume
317
Issue
13
Pages
1309
ISSN
  • 0002-9955 (ISSN-L)
  • 0098-7484
OpenAlex
W2604185978
Cited by
173
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 26 · 2019: 27 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 14
FWCI
36.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • JAMA (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (K12HS023000)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ethics and bioethics in healthcare
Keywords
shared decision-making, physician-patient communication, patient participation in treatment decisions
MeSH terms
Decision Making, Decision Support Techniques, Humans, Informed Consent, Physician-Patient Relations, Risk, United States, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, U.S., Washington

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review