Cited by 214Diabetes and associated disordersDiabetes Management and ResearchPancreatic function and diabetes

Effect of Oral Insulin on Prevention of Diabetes in Relatives of Patients With Type 1 Diabetes: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Open access
Writing Committee for the Type 1 Diabetes TrialNet Oral Insulin Study Group, Krischer, Jeffrey P., Schatz, Desmond A., Bundy, Brian, Skyler, Jay S., Greenbaum, Carla J.·2017·JAMA

Abstract

Importance: Type 1 diabetes requires major lifestyle changes and carries increased morbidity and mortality. Prevention or delay of diabetes would have major clinical effect. Objective: To determine whether oral insulin delays onset of type 1 diabetes in autoantibody-positive relatives of patients with type 1 diabetes. Design, Setting, and Participants: Between March 2, 2007, and December 21, 2015, relatives with at least 2 autoantibodies, including insulin autoantibodies and normal glucose tolerance, were enrolled in Canada, the United States, Australia, New Zealand, the United Kingdom, Italy, Sweden, Finland, and Germany. The main study group (n = 389) had first-phase insulin release on an intravenous glucose tolerance test that was higher than the threshold. The 55 patients in the secondary stratum 1 had an identical antibody profile as the main study group except they had first-phase insulin release that was lower than the threshold. Secondary strata 2 (n = 114) and strata 3 (n = 3) had different autoantibody profiles and first-phase insulin release threshold combinations. Follow-up continued through December 31, 2016. Interventions: Randomization to receive 7.5 mg/d of oral insulin (n = 283) or placebo (n = 277), including participants in the main study group who received oral insulin (n = 203) or placebo (n = 186). Main Outcome and Measures: The primary outcome was time to diabetes in the main study group. Significance was based on a 1-sided threshold of .05, and 1-sided 95% CIs are reported. Results: Of a total of 560 randomized participants (median enrollment age, 8.2 years; interquartile range [IQR], 5.7-12.1 years; 170 boys [60%]; 90.7% white non-Hispanic; 57.6% with a sibling with type 1 diabetes), 550 completed the trial including 389 participants (median age, 8.4 years; 245 boys [63%]), 382 (96%) in the main study group. During a median follow-up of 2.7 years (IQR, 1.5-4.6 years) in the main study group, diabetes was diagnosed in 58 participants (28.5%) in the oral insulin group and 62 (33%) in the placebo group. Time to diabetes was not significantly different between the 2 groups (hazard ratio [HR], 0.87; 95% CI, 0-1.2; P = .21). In secondary stratum 1 (n = 55), diabetes was diagnosed in 13 participants (48.1%) in the oral insulin group and in 19 participants (70.3%) in the placebo group. The time to diabetes was significantly longer with oral insulin (HR, 0.45; 95% CI, 0-0.82; P = .006). The HR for time to diabetes for the between-group comparisons for the 116 participants in the other secondary stratum was 1.03 (95% CI, 0-2.11; P = .53) and for the entire cohort of 560 participants was 0.83 (95% CI, 0-1.07; P = .11), which were not significantly different. The most common adverse event was infection (n = 254), with 134 events in the oral insulin group and 120 events in the placebo group, but no significant study-related adverse events occurred. Conclusions and Relevance: Among autoantibody-positive relatives of patients with type 1 diabetes, oral insulin at a dose of 7.5 mg/d, compared with placebo, did not delay or prevent the development of type 1 diabetes over 2.7 years. These findings do not support oral insulin as used in this study for diabetes prevention. Trial Registration: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00419562.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/jama.2017.17070

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Two phase 2 trials of daily oral administration of 7.5 mg insulin in children with multiple autoantibodies showed no significant effect in delaying the onset of clinical diabetes; however, subgroup analyses showed a delay in disease progression in individuals with impaired insulin secretion, with the HLA DR4-DQ8 haplotype, or with high concentrations of insulin or IA2 autoantibodies.

    “Two phase 2 trials evaluated daily oral administration of 7•5 mg insulin in children with multiple autoantibodies.40,41 Neither trial showed a significant effect in delaying the onset of clinical diabetes; however, subgroup analyses showed a delay in disease progression in individuals with impaired insulin secretion, with the HLA DR4DQ8 haplotype, or with high concentrations of insulin or IA2 auto”

    From The future of type 1 diabetes therapy (2025) · cites this paper as [41]

    Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • A later TrialNet study of low-dose oral insulin in similar autoantibody-positive people also failed.

    “the Type 1 Diabetes TrialNet Network completed a trial144 of low-dose oral insulin in a second cohort of individuals who were autoantibody positive with similar insulin autoantibody profiles, but this trial was also negative.”

    From Type 1 diabetes (2018) · cites this paper as [144]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 30 · Cited by 214

Authors
Writing Committee for the Type 1 Diabetes TrialNet Oral Insulin Study Group, Krischer, J. P., Schatz, D. A., Bundy, B., Skyler, J. S., & Greenbaum, C. J.
Affiliations
  • University of South Florida (US)
  • University of Florida (US)
  • University of Miami (US)
  • Benaroya Research Institute (US)
Corresponding author
Krischer, Jeffrey P.
Venue
JAMA
Published
2017-11-21
Volume
318
Issue
19
Pages
1891
ISSN
  • 0002-9955 (ISSN-L)
  • 0098-7484
OpenAlex
W2769332703
Cited by
214
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 17 · 2025: 30 · 2024: 26 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 32 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 20
FWCI
10.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • JAMA (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
  • Leiden Repository (Leiden University) (submittedVersion)
  • Archivio Istituzionale della Ricerca - Università Vita-Salute San Raffaele (submittedVersion)
  • Explore Bristol Research (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Eli Lilly and Company
  • Yale University
  • Children's Hospital Los Angeles
  • Vanderbilt University
  • University of Miami
  • University of Pennsylvania
  • Emory University
  • George Washington University
  • Wake Forest University
  • Harvard University
  • University of Minnesota
  • Cleveland Clinic
  • Baylor University
  • North Carolina State University
  • Helsingin Yliopisto
  • University of Washington
  • Joslin Diabetes Center
  • University of Pittsburgh
  • Georgetown University
  • University of South Florida
  • Children's Mercy Hospital
  • Children's National Hospital
  • King's College London
  • University of Bristol
  • Universiteit Leiden
  • Lunds Universitet
  • University of Toronto
  • Leids Universitair Medisch Centrum
  • Turun Yliopisto
  • National Institutes of Health (5ul1rr031986-02, UL1TR001108, UL1TR001855)
  • University of California, Los Angeles
  • University of California, San Francisco
  • National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases
  • National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (U01-DK-084565, U01DK061040, U01DK085461, U01DK085505, U01DK085476, U01DK085499, U01DK061029, U01DK103153, U01DK060987, U01DK061055, U01DK060916, U01DK061036, U01DK061030, U01DK061010, U01DK061037, U01DK106984, U01DK061058, U01DK061034, U01DK061035, U01DK085504, U01DK107013, UC4DK106993, U01DK061042, U01DK085465, U01DK085463, U01DK103266, U01DK085453, UC4DK117009, U01DK061041, U01DK085466, UC4DK097835, U01DK085509, U01DK107014, U01DK106994, U01DK060782, U01DK103282)
  • National Institute of Child Health and Human Development
  • National Center for Research Resources (UL1RR029890, M01RR000400, UL1-RR031986, UL1RR025744, UL1RR024153, UL1RR024982, UL1RR025761, UL1RR024975, UL1RR024139, UL1RR025780)
  • National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Diabetes and associated disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Pancreatic function and diabetes
Keywords
type 1 diabetes prevention, oral insulin, autoantibodies, insulin autoantibodies, first-phase insulin release, prediabetes, prediabetes prevention, children and adolescents, insulin sensitivity, insulin sensitivity index, HOMA-IR
MeSH terms
Administration, Oral, Adolescent, Autoantibodies, Child, Child, Preschool, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1, Family, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Glucose Tolerance Test, Humans, Hypoglycemic Agents, Insulin, Male, Treatment Failure

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review