Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 246

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Association of High-Sensitivity Cardiac Troponin I Concentration With Cardiac Outcomes in Patients With Suspected Acute Coronary Syndrome

Open access
Chapman, Andrew R., Lee, Kuan Ken, McAllister, David A., Cullen, Louise, Greenslade, Jaimi H., Parsonage, William, Worster, Andrew, Kavsak, Peter A., Blankenberg, Stefan, Neumann, Johannes, Sörensen, Nils A., Westermann, Dirk, Buijs, Madelon M., Verdel, Gerard J. E., Pickering, John W., Than, Martin P., Twerenbold, Raphael, Badertscher, Patrick, Sabti, Zaid, Mueller, Christian, Anand, Atul, Adamson, Philip, Strachan, Fiona E., Ferry, Amy, Sandeman, Dennis, Gray, Alasdair, Body, Richard, Keevil, Brian, Carlton, Edward, Greaves, Kim, Korley, Frederick K., Metkus, Thomas S., Sandoval, Yader, Apple, Fred S., Newby, David E., Shah, Anoop S. V., Mills, Nicholas L.·2017·JAMA

Abstract

Importance: High-sensitivity cardiac troponin I testing is widely used to evaluate patients with suspected acute coronary syndrome. A cardiac troponin concentration of less than 5 ng/L identifies patients at presentation as low risk, but the optimal threshold is uncertain. Objective: To evaluate the performance of a cardiac troponin I threshold of 5 ng/L at presentation as a risk stratification tool in patients with suspected acute coronary syndrome. Data Sources: Systematic search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane, and Web of Science databases from January 1, 2006, to March 18, 2017. Study Selection: Prospective studies measuring high-sensitivity cardiac troponin I concentrations in patients with suspected acute coronary syndrome in which the diagnosis was adjudicated according to the universal definition of myocardial infarction. Data Extraction and Synthesis: The systematic review identified 19 cohorts. Individual patient-level data were obtained from the corresponding authors of 17 cohorts, with aggregate data from 2 cohorts. Meta-estimates for primary and secondary outcomes were derived using a binomial-normal random-effects model. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was myocardial infarction or cardiac death at 30 days. Performance was evaluated in subgroups and across a range of troponin concentrations (2-16 ng/L) using individual patient data. Results: Of 11 845 articles identified, 104 underwent full-text review, and 19 cohorts from 9 countries were included. Among 22 457 patients included in the meta-analysis (mean age, 62 [SD, 15.5] years; n = 9329 women [41.5%]), the primary outcome occurred in 2786 (12.4%). Cardiac troponin I concentrations were less than 5 ng/L at presentation in 11 012 patients (49%), in whom there were 60 missed index or 30-day events (59 index myocardial infarctions, 1 myocardial infarction at 30 days, and no cardiac deaths at 30 days). This resulted in a negative predictive value of 99.5% (95% CI, 99.3%-99.6%) for the primary outcome. There were no cardiac deaths at 30 days and 7 (0.1%) at 1 year, with a negative predictive value of 99.9% (95% CI, 99.7%-99.9%) for cardiac death. Conclusions and Relevance: Among patients with suspected acute coronary syndrome, a high-sensitivity cardiac troponin I concentration of less than 5 ng/L identified those at low risk of myocardial infarction or cardiac death within 30 days. Further research is needed to understand the clinical utility and cost-effectiveness of this approach to risk stratification.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/jama.2017.17488

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 246

Metadata

Authors
Chapman, A. R., Lee, K. K., McAllister, D. A., Cullen, L., Greenslade, J. H., Parsonage, W., Worster, A., Kavsak, P. A., Blankenberg, S., Neumann, J., Sörensen, N. A., Westermann, D., Buijs, M. M., Verdel, G. J. E., Pickering, J. W., Than, M. P., Twerenbold, R., Badertscher, P., Sabti, Z., Mueller, C., Anand, A., Adamson, P., Strachan, F. E., Ferry, A., Sandeman, D., Gray, A., Body, R., Keevil, B., Carlton, E., Greaves, K., Korley, F. K., Metkus, T. S., Sandoval, Y., Apple, F. S., Newby, D. E., Shah, A. S. V., & Mills, N. L.
Venue
JAMA
Published
2017-11-21
Volume
318
Issue
19
Pages
1913
ISSN
  • 0002-9955 (ISSN-L)
  • 0098-7484
OpenAlex
W2767355864
Cited by
246
References
2
FWCI
18.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Association of High-Sensitivity Cardiac Troponin I Concentration With Cardiac Outcomes in Patients With Suspected Acute Coronary Syndrome. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/jama.2017.17488
The paper
Chapman, A. R., Lee, K. K., McAllister, D. A., Cullen, L., Greenslade, J. H., Parsonage, W., Worster, A., Kavsak, P. A., Blankenberg, S., Neumann, J., Sörensen, N. A., Westermann, D., Buijs, M. M., Verdel, G. J. E., Pickering, J. W., Than, M. P., Twerenbold, R., Badertscher, P., Sabti, Z., . . . Mills, N. L. (2017). Association of High-Sensitivity Cardiac Troponin I Concentration With Cardiac Outcomes in Patients With Suspected Acute Coronary Syndrome. JAMA. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2017.17488

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.