Cited by 309Organ Donation and TransplantationRenal Transplantation Outcomes and TreatmentsOrgan Transplantation Techniques and Outcomes

Association of Race and Ethnicity With Live Donor Kidney Transplantation in the United States From 1995 to 2014

Open access
Purnell, Tanjala S., Luo, Xun, Cooper, Lisa A., Massie, Allan B., Kucirka, Lauren M., Henderson, Macey L., Gordon, Elisa J., Crews, Deidra C. +2 more·2018·JAMA

Abstract

Importance Over the past 2 decades, there has been increased attention and effort to reduce disparities in live donor kidney transplantation (LDKT) for black, Hispanic, and Asian patients with end-stage kidney disease. The goal of this study was to investigate whether these efforts have been successful. Objective To estimate changes over time in racial/ethnic disparities in LDKT in the United States, accounting for differences in death and deceased donor kidney transplantation. Design, setting, and participants A secondary analysis of a prospectively maintained cohort study conducted in the United States of 453 162 adult first-time kidney transplantation candidates included in the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients between January 1, 1995, and December 31, 2014, with follow-up through December 31, 2016. Exposures Race/ethnicity. Main outcomes and measures The primary study outcome was time to LDKT. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards and competing risk models were constructed to assess changes in racial/ethnic disparities in LDKT among adults on the deceased donor kidney transplantation waiting list and interaction terms were used to test the statistical significance of temporal changes in racial/ethnic differences in receipt of LDKT. The adjusted subhazard ratios are estimates derived from the multivariable competing risk models. Data were categorized into 5-year increments (1995-1999, 2000-2004, 2005-2009, 2010-2014) to allow for an adequate sample size in each…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/jama.2017.19152

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Among adult first-time kidney transplantation candidates in the U.S. added to the deceased donor kidney transplantation waiting list between 1995 and 2014, disparities in the receipt of live donor kidney transplantation (LDKT) increased from 1995-1999 to 2010-2014.

    “among adult first-time kidney transplantation candidates in the United States who were added to the deceased donor kidney transplantation waiting list between 1995 and 2014, disparities in the receipt of live donor kidney transplantation (LDKT) increased from 1995–1999 to 2010–2014 [67].”
  • In 1995, the cumulative incidence of LDKT at 2 years after appearing on the waiting list was 7.0% among white patients, 3.4% among black patients, 6.8% among Hispanic patients, and 5.1% among Asian patients; in 2014, it was 11.4% among white patients, 2.9% among black patients, 5.9% among Hispanic patients, and 5.6% among Asian patients.

    “In 1995, the cumulative incidence of LDKT at 2 years after appearing on the waiting list was 7.0% among white patients, 3.4% among black patients, 6.8% among Hispanic patients, and 5.1% among Asian patients.”
  • From 1995-1999 to 2010-2014, racial disparities in the receipt of LDKT increased (p < 0.001 for all statistical interaction terms in adjusted models comparing white patients versus black, Hispanic, and Asian patients).

    “From 1995–1999 to 2010–2014, racial disparities in the receipt of LDKT increased (p < 0.001 for all statistical interaction terms in adjusted models comparing white patients versus black, Hispanic, and Asian patients).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Purnell, T. S., Luo, X., Cooper, L. A., Massie, A. B., Kucirka, L. M., Henderson, M. L., Gordon, E. J., Crews, D. C., Boulware, L. E., & Segev, D. L.
Affiliations
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
  • Northwestern University (US)
  • Duke University (US)
Corresponding author
Segev, Dorry L.
Venue
JAMA
Published
2018-01-02
Volume
319
Issue
1
Pages
49
ISSN
  • 0002-9955 (ISSN-L)
  • 0098-7484
OpenAlex
W2782209540
Cited by
309
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 27 · 2025: 33 · 2024: 40 · 2023: 33 · 2022: 43 · 2021: 45 · 2020: 45 · 2019: 30 · 2018: 12
FWCI
31.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • JAMA (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (K01 HS024600)
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (K24HL083113)
  • National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (R03AI126090)
  • National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (R01DK098759, F30DK095545, R01DK104876, K24DK101828, K01DK114388, K23DK097184, K01DK101677)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Organ Donation and Transplantation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Transplantation › Renal Transplantation Outcomes and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Organ Transplantation Techniques and Outcomes
Keywords
living donor kidney transplantation, racial and ethnic disparities, end-stage renal disease, Black patients, Hispanic patients, Asian patients, time to transplant, deceased donor kidney transplantation, Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients, kidney transplantation candidates
MeSH terms
Adult, Asian, Black or African American, Female, Hispanic or Latino, Humans, Kidney Failure, Chronic, Male, Middle Aged, United States, Waiting Lists, Cohort Studies, Kidney Transplantation, Living Donors, White People, Kaplan-Meier Estimate, Healthcare Disparities

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review